**UPDATED** Current P2Pool Server List

[zvs]

I think it would also be important for the pools to list their bitcoind limitations.
Some p2pools are configured to limit transactions drastically on the Bitcoin network and thus are bad for Bitcoin.

hmm, that'd actually be nice if p2pool pulled the bitcoind information on maxblocksize, fees, etc and posted it on the web page somewhere

[1714032620]

1714032620

[1714032620]

1714032620

[1714032620]

1714032620

[BTCMiners.net]

I think it would also be important for the pools to list their bitcoind limitations.
Some p2pools are configured to limit transactions drastically on the Bitcoin network and thus are bad for Bitcoin.

hmm, that'd actually be nice if p2pool pulled the bitcoind information on maxblocksize, fees, etc and posted it on the web page somewhere

How about I put in a paragraph on the P2Pool guide.  Also, some things are best left untouched.  gmaxwell and I had this conversation via IRC the other day that 'less is more' in terms of -flags and arguments, because those are put there mostly for situations that would require tweaking, where as most people shouldn't need to change much if any at all.  But if you all want, I'll add a paragraph about this all in the initial post and link to the P2Pool Guide.

[BTCMiners.net]

Update.  Anyone have a pool that needs modified in listings or added/removed?

[daemondazz]

Update.  Anyone have a pool that needs modified in listings or added/removed?

I'm concerned people are going to see this:

Adelaide, Australia | http://cryptominer.org:9332 | 1.0% | BTC | CryptoMiner | daemondazz

and get upset that it's actually configured as a pool with 100% fee and 0.25BTC payout threshold. Can you add a note like: "Operating as pool, see http://cryptominer.org/bitcoin/"?

Also, I have a litecoin node running as well:

Adelaide, Australia | http://cryptominer.org:9327 | 1.0% | LTC | CryptoMiner | daemondazz

[polrpaul]

yes, good call - important to note the difference.

[BTCMiners.net]

Update.  Anyone have a pool that needs modified in listings or added/removed?

I'm concerned people are going to see this:

Adelaide, Australia | http://cryptominer.org:9332 | 1.0% | BTC | CryptoMiner | daemondazz

and get upset that it's actually configured as a pool with 100% fee and 0.25BTC payout threshold. Can you add a note like: "Operating as pool, see http://cryptominer.org/bitcoin/"?

Also, I have a litecoin node running as well:

Adelaide, Australia | http://cryptominer.org:9327 | 1.0% | LTC | CryptoMiner | daemondazz

Added note to listing and also added your LTC node.

yes, good call - important to note the difference.

Agreed.

[kano]

I think it would also be important for the pools to list their bitcoind limitations.
Some p2pools are configured to limit transactions drastically on the Bitcoin network and thus are bad for Bitcoin.

hmm, that'd actually be nice if p2pool pulled the bitcoind information on maxblocksize, fees, etc and posted it on the web page somewhere

How about I put in a paragraph on the P2Pool guide.  Also, some things are best left untouched.  gmaxwell and I had this conversation via IRC the other day that 'less is more' in terms of -flags and arguments, because those are put there mostly for situations that would require tweaking, where as most people shouldn't need to change much if any at all.  But if you all want, I'll add a paragraph about this all in the initial post and link to the P2Pool Guide.

If you read the p2pool thread, it's not rare for people to change these settings ... so a comment about it is rather pointless.

zvs's idea is actually the best suggestion I've heard.

... gmaxwell's comments are clearly pointless if that's was all he came up with ...

[BTCMiners.net]

I think it would also be important for the pools to list their bitcoind limitations.
Some p2pools are configured to limit transactions drastically on the Bitcoin network and thus are bad for Bitcoin.

hmm, that'd actually be nice if p2pool pulled the bitcoind information on maxblocksize, fees, etc and posted it on the web page somewhere

How about I put in a paragraph on the P2Pool guide.  Also, some things are best left untouched.  gmaxwell and I had this conversation via IRC the other day that 'less is more' in terms of -flags and arguments, because those are put there mostly for situations that would require tweaking, where as most people shouldn't need to change much if any at all.  But if you all want, I'll add a paragraph about this all in the initial post and link to the P2Pool Guide.

If you read the p2pool thread, it's not rare for people to change these settings ... so a comment about it is rather pointless.

zvs's idea is actually the best suggestion I've heard.

... gmaxwell's comments are clearly pointless if that's was all he came up with ...

Very true that people do use them, however, he is right for the most part.  He is right in the sense that the developer spent more time thinking about whatever flag you're wanting to turn on... say --max-cons or --outgoing-conns those two flags alone, don't you think forrestv spent more than a few minute thinking on what would be the most ideal situations need?  Sure there are extreme instances where those two flags would need to be modified.

As for the Bitcoind Blocksize and txfee  and p2pool fee, those are up to the user.  I'd hope you'd also take those into account as well that the makers of Bitcoind (Satoshi and the continuing devs..) have put some thought into it.   Saying gmaxwell is pointless is basically giving forrestv and the devs of Bitcoind a slap in the face, BECAUSE THEY DESIGNED AND ARE WORKING ON IT!!!  

Rant over..

[zvs]

I nixed my LTC pool since nobody used it in like 10 days, but I guess it was never listed anyways.

I have a quarkcoin pool up now at nogleg.com:8372, 0% fee, 0% donation.  Though not sure if it'd be considered p2pool in the classical sense?  It's running as a solo pool

[BTCMiners.net]

I nixed my LTC pool since nobody used it in like 10 days, but I guess it was never listed anyways.

I have a quarkcoin pool up now at nogleg.com:8372, 0% fee, 0% donation.  Though not sure if it'd be considered p2pool in the classical sense?  It's running as a solo pool

If it's running as a 'regular' pool, I think the best place for that one would be: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=104664.0

[polarhei]

Notice to others: The noirpool852.no-ip.biz is current down for a while due to maintenance and planning issues.

Estimated date for up: In october,2013

I'll be taking you off the list for the time being since that is a ways away.  Once you have it back up and running, please send me a PM.

I shall

[HellDiverUK]

I'm going to have connection issues for the next week or so here (pulling CAT5 through the house, moving electrical sockets, etc, etc), so 847Pool is going down as of now.

Considering I've had about 3 miners connecting for a total of about 10 minutes, I don't think it'll be missed.  I doubt I'll bring it back up in a hurry.

[BTCMiners.net]

I'm going to have connection issues for the next week or so here (pulling CAT5 through the house, moving electrical sockets, etc, etc), so 847Pool is going down as of now.

Considering I've had about 3 miners connecting for a total of about 10 minutes, I don't think it'll be missed.  I doubt I'll bring it back up in a hurry.

I'll strike through your pools with with an ETA of being back up 10 days from now so that would place it on September 9th, 2013 by 00:00 UTC and then it will be removed from the list.  The strike through will be left there since you gave notice on it being down, but after 10 days I will have to remove it as I've said I will only keep updated P2Pool nodes on the list.   However, thanks for the update and will update it accordingly.

[BTCMiners.net]

New node added, Leeds, UK | http://p2coins.com | 0.0% | BTC | P2Pool | ktbken

[IYFTech]

Bloody hell - ssd gave up the ghost on iyftech.zapto.org - awaiting delivery of new one - ETA:  3 - 5 daze.

So that's what those latency issues were.........

[BTCMiners.net]

Bloody hell - ssd gave up the ghost on iyftech.zapto.org - awaiting delivery of new one - ETA:  3 - 5 daze.

So that's what those latency issues were.........

Well at least you're fixing it.  I'm personally about to add 100 GH/s more to the P2Pool network!

[HellDiverUK]

Bloody hell - ssd gave up the ghost on iyftech.zapto.org

OCZ? 

[BTCMiners.net]

Bloody hell - ssd gave up the ghost on iyftech.zapto.org

OCZ? 

Probably.. I never buy OCZ, ever.

[polarhei]

noirpool852 is now on live. now with planned mining service. go to noirpool852 to take a look

[HellDiverUK]

847Pool is back online.  Rewiring and stuff completed.  

Fee is at 0.5% now.

Still the greenest P2Pool Node?  May be...