Bitcoin Forum
September 24, 2021, 03:50:56 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 22.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 [203] 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 ... 473 »
  Print  
Author Topic: PhoenixMiner 5.7b: fastest Ethereum/Ethash miner with lowest devfee (Win/Linux)  (Read 688088 times)
Trehjulingsleffe
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 17
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 01, 2020, 10:54:03 AM
Last edit: January 01, 2020, 11:42:49 AM by Trehjulingsleffe
 #4041

The new beta version is ready. You can download PhoenixMiner 4.9b from here:

https://mega.nz/#F!2NkkjaxC!OOFiV0uPuPI1YoebTE7hMw  (MEGA)

If you want to check the integrity of the downloaded file, please use the following hashes (you need the last file PhoenixMiner_NVRTC_Windows.zip only if you want to mine BCI with Nvdia cards under Windows):
Code:
   File: PhoenixMiner_4.9b_Windows.zip
    ===================================
   SHA-1: 4b8f002bfed687938580a60354ee74ba2b9ed97a
 SHA-256: 5ab17ce168d2da17ad49e8cd9a0263abdfc5e9412079458026f1dede64fb15c1
 SHA-512: 71d9cf2a65d378900bbb616895f4f4cede8da8fa8ae19352491f82e82e27e9e079e7c879789afb833db2b588527f391acc725d74a638f8b91b9356e0d48add8a

    File: PhoenixMiner_4.9b_Linux.tar.gz
    ====================================
   SHA-1: d8dd717c554227da8834880b8d9a93b4e589b8b0
 SHA-256: e357ed9fc56e13f627d5a576fff7b6c84d0790a7ce85a1ac6dd2022e30dd5c15
 SHA-512: 8829b3d65818a016fa42f57e09d22a7aa26cc50e287f28837ea9cde59626f70f3dcdf9b641744053259e12fc6132e98553b092cf80f676cf329996adce3c6b10

    File: PhoenixMiner_NVRTC_Windows.zip
    ====================================
   SHA-1: ff6fa5e018adbd52caf631c42b7c2fac7ce48a51
 SHA-256: 8087757169405d51ea8ba818347fb05d0450aef985c29272165070346eb5a54a
 SHA-512: 7b2d832f7f40578bb1f501d5174467f5ae06612e601dab769fd56d39da48a471b18c6373435a485155f70fec4017d8378797bf1e1dfe5d62fee30fa6a1d992c4

The new features in this release are:

  • Added support for AMD RX5500 cards
  • Added support for the latest AMD Windows drivers 19.12.3
  • Fixed the problem with loading NVML library with the latest Nvidia drivers
  • Fixed a problem that was introduced in 4.8c causing mismatching of the cards when using more than one value in -cclock or any other command-line argument with more than one value (i.e. when using different values for each card)
  • Added an HTML version of the documentation for better navigation and readability

Please let us know if you have any problems or questions related to PhoenixMiner 4.9b.

I've tried 4.9b now with driver 19.12.3 and it says unknown openCL driver and hangs when mining about 15 seconds (totaly freeze, cut the power is the only solution)
Reverted back to 19.9.2 driver and it mines at about 20 minutes, then hang and reboots itself. About 0,3% better hashrate than 4.7c (cant use 4.8c at all)

No logging.

Hardware:
Motherboard: Asus B250 Mining Expert
CPU: i5 6500
RAM: 8gb
Virual memory: 64gb
Gpu's (in order in miner): RX470,RX470,RX580,RX580,Vii,RX470,RX470,RX470,RX580,RX470

Conf for cards:
-cclock 1240,1240,1250,1250,1830,1240,1240,1240,1220,1240
-mclock 2150,2150,2150,2150,1030,2150,2150,2150,2120,2150
-cvddc 930,890,890,930,970,890,930,900,950,900
-mvddc 935,900,910,930,950,900,930,900,950,900
-clKernel 1
-mi 14
-amd
-acm
-cdm 2

Is it something there that's not compatible with 4.9b?

Edit: over an hour now with 4.9b without issues. 19.9.2 driver, still can't use 19.12.3.
1632455456
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1632455456

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1632455456
Reply with quote  #2

1632455456
Report to moderator
1632455456
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1632455456

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1632455456
Reply with quote  #2

1632455456
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1632455456
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1632455456

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1632455456
Reply with quote  #2

1632455456
Report to moderator
1632455456
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1632455456

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1632455456
Reply with quote  #2

1632455456
Report to moderator
1632455456
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1632455456

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1632455456
Reply with quote  #2

1632455456
Report to moderator
skinnyfalcon
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 49
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 01, 2020, 03:51:28 PM
 #4042


Yes, I tried. Phoenix said that it was a bag with multiGPU system with different overclock settings.

Has anyone addressed this issue? I have AMD 19.12.2 and phoenix 4.9b, random crashes still pop up frequently.
Most people have multi GPU systems with different OC setting for max hash.
0xcosmos
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 594
Merit: 110


View Profile
January 01, 2020, 07:07:16 PM
 #4043

Yes, I tried. Phoenix said that it was a bag with multiGPU system with different overclock settings.

oh okay
did not knew about that

Has anyone addressed this issue? I have AMD 19.12.2 and phoenix 4.9b, random crashes still pop up frequently.
Most people have multi GPU systems with different OC setting for max hash.


as with the previous post taken as reference
try downgrading the driver version to the version
it may resolve the issue with no impact on hash rate
UnclWish
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1470
Merit: 253


View Profile
January 02, 2020, 07:17:32 AM
 #4044

I've tried 4.9b now with driver 19.12.3 and it says unknown openCL driver and hangs when mining about 15 seconds (totaly freeze, cut the power is the only solution)
Reverted back to 19.9.2 driver and it mines at about 20 minutes, then hang and reboots itself. About 0,3% better hashrate than 4.7c (cant use 4.8c at all)

No logging.

Hardware:
Motherboard: Asus B250 Mining Expert
CPU: i5 6500
RAM: 8gb
Virual memory: 64gb
Gpu's (in order in miner): RX470,RX470,RX580,RX580,Vii,RX470,RX470,RX470,RX580,RX470

Conf for cards:
-cclock 1240,1240,1250,1250,1830,1240,1240,1240,1220,1240
-mclock 2150,2150,2150,2150,1030,2150,2150,2150,2120,2150
-cvddc 930,890,890,930,970,890,930,900,950,900
-mvddc 935,900,910,930,950,900,930,900,950,900
-clKernel 1
-mi 14
-amd
-acm
-cdm 2

Is it something there that's not compatible with 4.9b?

Edit: over an hour now with 4.9b without issues. 19.9.2 driver, still can't use 19.12.3.
On RX 580 8Gb cards 4.9b works fine with 19.12.3 driver.
skinnyfalcon
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 49
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 03, 2020, 03:41:56 AM
 #4045

The crash seems completely random, anywhere from 3 to 10 min, most of the time the system will restart and the miner will run from autostart, but sometimes the miner just won't run even after the system restart. There are no error messages, I have checked all log files and everything just seem to be running normal than "CRASH", system restart. My rig was running without a hiccup for weeks on end somewhere before the 4.8 release, now it can't even stay on for more than 10 minute at a time.


 Angry Angry Angry
UnclWish
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1470
Merit: 253


View Profile
January 03, 2020, 06:40:23 AM
 #4046

The crash seems completely random, anywhere from 3 to 10 min, most of the time the system will restart and the miner will run from autostart, but sometimes the miner just won't run even after the system restart. There are no error messages, I have checked all log files and everything just seem to be running normal than "CRASH", system restart. My rig was running without a hiccup for weeks on end somewhere before the 4.8 release, now it can't even stay on for more than 10 minute at a time.


 Angry Angry Angry
The size of DAG allways increase steps by 8Mb every time. And every time when it grows up it's need more vmemory.
And you must remember that all equipment wears. PSU, GPU chips, vmemory chips... All these equip can degradate with time cause to 24/7 work on close to 100% using.
Try to raise voltages on GPU's and mvddc a bit and check.
ninjam
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 84
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 03, 2020, 08:14:09 PM
 #4047

Is is normal to have different hashrate for eth and etc? Nvidia gpus. Difference is about 2.5% more when mining ethereum. 4.8c version.
Digital_Seytan
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 186
Merit: 1

Hayat guzeldir yasamasini bilene !


View Profile WWW
January 03, 2020, 10:13:44 PM
 #4048

Is is normal to have different hashrate for eth and etc? Nvidia gpus. Difference is about 2.5% more when mining ethereum. 4.8c version.

why there is a difference with the same config eth mining and etc 3% difference is nobody understands

Hayat guzeldir yasamasini bilene !
Digital_Seytan
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 186
Merit: 1

Hayat guzeldir yasamasini bilene !


View Profile WWW
January 03, 2020, 10:34:34 PM
 #4049

Hello dev PM why is there not even a new version with a big change HuhHuh??

Hayat guzeldir yasamasini bilene !
darkneorus
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 240
Merit: 3


View Profile
January 03, 2020, 10:48:57 PM
 #4050

Is is normal to have different hashrate for eth and etc? Nvidia gpus. Difference is about 2.5% more when mining ethereum. 4.8c version.

why there is a difference with the same config eth mining and etc 3% difference is nobody understands
because of different DAG size.
UnclWish
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1470
Merit: 253


View Profile
January 04, 2020, 06:51:06 AM
 #4051

Is is normal to have different hashrate for eth and etc? Nvidia gpus. Difference is about 2.5% more when mining ethereum. 4.8c version.

why there is a difference with the same config eth mining and etc 3% difference is nobody understands
Try to make autotune both on one and another. I think best -gt parameters will differ.
sbcandrew
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 58
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 06, 2020, 01:35:11 AM
 #4052

здpaвcтвyйтe, y кoгo-нибyдь пoлyчилocь зaпycтить PhoenixMiner 4.8c нa Windows 7? Пpи зaпycкe мaйнep вылeтaeт c oшибкoй amdocl64.dll кoд c0000005, в лoгe виднo чтo этo пpoиcxoдит пpи пoпыткe гeнepaции DAG. Bидeoкapтa RX 570. Дpaйвepa пepeпpoбoвaл вce(((

--------------------------


Hello, did anyone manage to run PhoenixMiner 4.8c on Windows 7? At startup, the miner crashes with the error amdocl64.dll code c0000005, the log shows that this happens when trying to generate DAG. Video card RX 570. I tried everything drivers(((
guzzymese
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 84
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 06, 2020, 01:13:53 PM
 #4053


Hello, did anyone manage to run PhoenixMiner 4.8c on Windows 7? At startup, the miner crashes with the error amdocl64.dll code c0000005, the log shows that this happens when trying to generate DAG. Video card RX 570. I tried everything drivers(((

Virtual memory, how much?
sbcandrew
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 58
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 06, 2020, 04:26:39 PM
 #4054


Hello, did anyone manage to run PhoenixMiner 4.8c on Windows 7? At startup, the miner crashes with the error amdocl64.dll code c0000005, the log shows that this happens when trying to generate DAG. Video card RX 570. I tried everything drivers(((

Virtual memory, how much?

i set 16GB, 32Gb, 48Gb, no result. Computer with 1 card rx570 4gb
guzzymese
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 84
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 06, 2020, 04:41:18 PM
 #4055

I think 4GB card is almost obsolete for mining because increase of dag, not 100% sure but...
sbcandrew
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 58
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 06, 2020, 04:56:26 PM
 #4056

I think 4GB card is almost obsolete for mining because increase of dag, not 100% sure but...
no, dag size eth 3,5gb. These cards work without problems on Windiws 10, but do not want to work on Windows 7. Problem in the program
0xcosmos
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 594
Merit: 110


View Profile
January 06, 2020, 04:57:12 PM
 #4057

i set 16GB, 32Gb, 48Gb, no result. Computer with 1 card rx570 4gb

ubuntu 18.04
sapphire rx 570 4gb pulse
working just fine
use linux distro or try windows 10 ltsc
sbcandrew
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 58
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 06, 2020, 05:33:45 PM
 #4058

i set 16GB, 32Gb, 48Gb, no result. Computer with 1 card rx570 4gb

ubuntu 18.04
sapphire rx 570 4gb pulse
working just fine
use linux distro or try windows 10 ltsc

I know that they work on Windows 10. The task is to run it on Windows 7, since Windows 10 reserves video memory and does not allow people to use 4GB of memory. -benchmark 352 is the maximum era on which a 4GB graphics card works in Windows 10, and a DAG file is only 3.75Gb
biospb
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 64
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 06, 2020, 10:06:12 PM
 #4059

Hi, PhoenixMiner!
Merry Christmas and Happy new year!  Cheesy

It seems that Nvidia kernel optimizations for lower power consumption no longer work for last DAG epochs so it is needed to increase core clock or PL again and again to get the same hashrate.
Please take a look if it can be done again.
btw, 440 series nvidia drivers are greatly optimized in terms of irq/queue performance, producing twice less LA on heavy gpu usage. and new cuda 10.2 also.

Next problem - when mining is resumed after reaching tstop/tstart gpu quite often get stuck after few such cycles. Can resuming be done more smooth from low intensity and step by step increasing to target?
Also intensity can be reduced in advance when getting close to tstop temp.

And what about gt auto-tuning not from 0, but from defined gt values? it will take much less time and be more accurate. so there will be no need to set exact values every time oveclocking is changed for one of gpus.
it can be a problem as auto-tuning runs after each stop/resume cycle and can take longer than reaching tstop temp again)


Thanks in advance!
stryker7176
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 06, 2020, 11:27:53 PM
 #4060

Anyone else suspect the devs of stealing hashes? I'm seeing about a 12% loss when using Phoenixminer vs Claymore. I would suspect a 5% deviation across all miners from what's being reported locally vs what's being reported on the mining server, but 12% with just phoenixminer seems suspicious.
Pages: « 1 ... 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 [203] 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 ... 473 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!