this is of course old news (
mtr article), but i can not really find a lot regarding the topic. anybody else working in this direction?
it is almost 2 years who this kind of article comes out.
i don't care about it..
isn't it like saying 'i don't care about wifi' in 1989?)
No its more like talking about 'cold fusion' in 1988,
A real scientist will walk away from you, a layman will be deeply interested
Talking about Quantum-Computing in any fashion, other than a bunch of REAL physicists at a bar, is non-real
Most of my physics friends all say "I didn't really understand QM until I was drunk and had it explained",
Feynman said "Nobody understand's QM",
When somebody understands QM, then they just might be able to make a QC, until then butter-fly wings will flap in the air,
I will not bother with this 'article' ( two years old), but let me guess its a layman's article? Written in a laymans blog or magazine?
Most of this stuff is not unlike BITCOIN, I venture to say only one in 10k understand the 'real' about bitcoin, and certainly the same could be said of quantum-computers. Much of the talk of BTC on this forum is just the urban myths of BTC, and QC-BTC is the same, not based on fact, but based on religious fervor.
