CoinTerra announces its first ASIC - Hash-Rate greater than 500 GH/s

[Minor Miner]

I've got 3 rigs that all report 1.5-1.7 locally but only get 3.9 on any pool.  Anyone else experience this?

Thus far, I have only seen GMaxwell say that he can achieve the same hashrate as the interface claims.   Everyone else who has posted seems to be in the 1.3-1.45 TH/s range for each unit.   I believe Con addressed this already too.

[1713506852]

1713506852

[Minor Miner]

I've got 3 rigs that all report 1.5-1.7 locally but only get 3.9 on any pool.  Anyone else experience this?

Thus far, I have only seen GMaxwell say that he can achieve the same hashrate as the interface claims.   Everyone else who has posted seems to be in the 1.3-1.45 TH/s range for each unit.   I believe Con addressed this already too.

I have got up to 1.5

Is that an average on one machine for a period of days or do you mean "every now and then it spikes up?"

[boozer]

 I believe Con addressed this already too.

Yea, yea, but won't it increase my hashrate if I keep posting more about it?  

Just disappointing to see :/  Not convinced its correct yet...

[twmz]

I've got 3 rigs that all report 1.5-1.7 locally but only get 3.9 on any pool.  Anyone else experience this?

Thus far, I have only seen GMaxwell say that he can achieve the same hashrate as the interface claims.   Everyone else who has posted seems to be in the 1.3-1.45 TH/s range for each unit.   I believe Con addressed this already too.

I have got up to 1.5

Is that an average on one machine for a period of days or do you mean "every now and then it spikes up?"

12 hours. But the machine reports much higher....

My unit's built-in dashboard reports 1600 GH/s.  My pool (btcguild) reports about 1580 GH/s.  My custom share-logging mining dashboard calculates the hashrate at 1570 GH/s (which is a three hour average based on submitted shares).

So they are all fairly consistent for me.

[VolanicEruptor]

so how do I go about getting a 25% refund for the hash power which I did not receive?  Will they put up a fight?

[Alvi]

I've got 3 rigs that all report 1.5-1.7 locally but only get 3.9 on any pool.  Anyone else experience this?

Thus far, I have only seen GMaxwell say that he can achieve the same hashrate as the interface claims.   Everyone else who has posted seems to be in the 1.3-1.45 TH/s range for each unit.   I believe Con addressed this already too.

I have got up to 1.5

Is that an average on one machine for a period of days or do you mean "every now and then it spikes up?"

12 hours. But the machine reports much higher....

My unit's built-in dashboard reports 1600 GH/s.  My pool (btcguild) reports about 1580 GH/s.  My custom share-logging mining dashboard calculates the hashrate at 1570 GH/s (which is a three hour average based on submitted shares).

So they are all fairly consistent for me.

how are you doing at btcguild? i have never used that pool.

[twmz]

My unit's built-in dashboard reports 1600 GH/s.  My pool (btcguild) reports about 1580 GH/s.  My custom share-logging mining dashboard calculates the hashrate at 1570 GH/s (which is a three hour average based on submitted shares).

So they are all fairly consistent for me.

how are you doing at btcguild? i have never used that pool.

I'm happy with them.  I prefer them primarily because they are stable while also being large enough that they don't have massive variance.

[xstr8guy]

So I finally got p2pool up and running but I'm having trouble getting consistent hashrate...it was initially getting up to 2.9Thash for two units (about 1.45Thash each) so similar to Eligius but then it tanked to 2.3xThash for both and after a lot of messing around rebooting the units I managed to get it up to 2.6-2.7Thash for two units.  One unit is now doing 1.3Thash only apparently, grr.

Don't worry about this missing TH. usually you see in p2pool little lower hash rate. in the end they make same hash rate as they made before. my jupiters are showing instead of 550GH 510GH and jupiter II batch scows only 600GH. in the end they are making more BTC as my miner in conservative mining pools. i have tested my own node already weeks and found finally a way to optimize it so that payouts are per 550GH miner such high as it would be 650GH. hash rate is shown stlii lower as the miners are.

Sounds like P2P is broken to me if stats are so different than other pools.

[JoseSan]

I've got 3 rigs that all report 1.5-1.7 locally but only get 3.9 on any pool.  Anyone else experience this?

Thus far, I have only seen GMaxwell say that he can achieve the same hashrate as the interface claims.   Everyone else who has posted seems to be in the 1.3-1.45 TH/s range for each unit.   I believe Con addressed this already too.

I have got up to 1.5

Is that an average on one machine for a period of days or do you mean "every now and then it spikes up?"

12 hours. But the machine reports much higher....

My unit's built-in dashboard reports 1600 GH/s.  My pool (btcguild) reports about 1580 GH/s.  My custom share-logging mining dashboard calculates the hashrate at 1570 GH/s (which is a three hour average based on submitted shares).

So they are all fairly consistent for me.

Ditto. Almost identical numbers. 1620 dashboard, 1580 pool-side (Eligius 12-hour rate) which has been steady for a week.

[Tegija]

My unit's built-in dashboard reports 1600 GH/s.  My pool (btcguild) reports about 1580 GH/s.  My custom share-logging mining dashboard calculates the hashrate at 1570 GH/s (which is a three hour average based on submitted shares).

So they are all fairly consistent for me.

how are you doing at btcguild? i have never used that pool.

I'm happy with them.  I prefer them primarily because they are stable while also being large enough that they don't have massive variance.

they are happy with you too... you give them 1.5-3% of your income. for what?

use p2pool and don´t support centralized mining! in p2pool nobody can steal your money, you have better payouts and you are supporting decentralized idea of bitcoin. we, miners are responsible for that, that bitcoin is staying alive and none gets power over bitcoin network. to avoid 51% attack.

Sounds like P2P is broken to me if stats are so different than other pools.

no, there is nothing broken. in p2pool mining works just a bit different. for what you need your stats? for feeling yourself better? only thing what really counts in the end is payout.
i was/am mining in different pools and if you are looking stats of your has rate variance in single shifts then you have in different shifts +/-25% too. you just don't recognize it because there are too many shifts to check. this way mining pools are even able to manipulate your stats if they want. p2pool ist the most honest pool in all bit coin network, because all shares are controlled/shared from/with other peers. there is no possibility that somebody can manipulate your income. even x% fee is not really a fee of x%, instead of that it means that your node has a chance of x% to get this share instead of you.
most of nodes are without any fee, so you do not have to pay any senseless fees to some central. if there are some fees in node then they are minimal to be able to cover costs of node.
try it out and you will experience the magic of p2pool yourself.

if you have any further questions, feel free to PM me.

[twmz]

I'm happy with them.  I prefer them primarily because they are stable while also being large enough that they don't have massive variance.

they are happy with you too... you give them 1.5-3% of your income. for what?

use p2pool and don´t support centralized mining!

Both parts of my "because..." sentence are important to me (I highlighted the second part for emphasis).  

In any case, this is off topic from this thread and we can continue the debate via PM or in the p2pool/btcguild threads.

[Tegija]

I'm happy with them.  I prefer them primarily because they are stable while also being large enough that they don't have massive variance.

they are happy with you too... you give them 1.5-3% of your income. for what?

use p2pool and don´t support centralized mining!

Both parts of my "because..." sentence are important to me (I highlighted the second part for emphasis). 

In any case, this is off topic from this thread and we can continue the debate via PM or in the p2pool/btcguild threads.

i agree. the point is that there was a question and discussion rolled on.

[testerx]

I've got 3 rigs that all report 1.5-1.7 locally but only get 3.9 on any pool.  Anyone else experience this?

Thus far, I have only seen GMaxwell say that he can achieve the same hashrate as the interface claims.   Everyone else who has posted seems to be in the 1.3-1.45 TH/s range for each unit.   I believe Con addressed this already too.

I have got up to 1.5

Is that an average on one machine for a period of days or do you mean "every now and then it spikes up?"

12 hours. But the machine reports much higher....

My unit's built-in dashboard reports 1600 GH/s.  My pool (btcguild) reports about 1580 GH/s.  My custom share-logging mining dashboard calculates the hashrate at 1570 GH/s (which is a three hour average based on submitted shares).

So they are all fairly consistent for me.

Ditto. Almost identical numbers. 1620 dashboard, 1580 pool-side (Eligius 12-hour rate) which has been steady for a week.

Interesting, I wonder what the differences are between people getting the same hashrate locally and on the pool and people seeing large differences.  What kind of networking hardware do you run?  I'm using a linksys router with Tomato on it.

[Korbman]

I apologize if this has been asked already, but has anyone noticed any significant variance on either of the boards (from the status page)?

The first board, CTA0, is varying pretty wildly at higher power steps (~150GH/s up through 800GH/s) with quite a few errors (786 out of 378,000...not so bad, but way higher than CTA1). The only issue I've found so far is that out of the 8 cores on that board, 1 is reporting "0" voltage (all others are stable around ~620-630). Normally I didn't think that would pose such a wide swing in hash rate.

Anyone else with a [possibly] dead core?

[boozer]

Interesting, I wonder what the differences are between people getting the same hashrate locally and on the pool and people seeing large differences.  What kind of networking hardware do you run?  I'm using a linksys router with Tomato on it.

Mines remote, but I asked what router was running and it was an Asus, but it also has Tomato running on it. 

[JoseSan]

I've got 3 rigs that all report 1.5-1.7 locally but only get 3.9 on any pool.  Anyone else experience this?

Thus far, I have only seen GMaxwell say that he can achieve the same hashrate as the interface claims.   Everyone else who has posted seems to be in the 1.3-1.45 TH/s range for each unit.   I believe Con addressed this already too.

I have got up to 1.5

Is that an average on one machine for a period of days or do you mean "every now and then it spikes up?"

12 hours. But the machine reports much higher....

My unit's built-in dashboard reports 1600 GH/s.  My pool (btcguild) reports about 1580 GH/s.  My custom share-logging mining dashboard calculates the hashrate at 1570 GH/s (which is a three hour average based on submitted shares).

So they are all fairly consistent for me.

Ditto. Almost identical numbers. 1620 dashboard, 1580 pool-side (Eligius 12-hour rate) which has been steady for a week.

Interesting, I wonder what the differences are between people getting the same hashrate locally and on the pool and people seeing large differences.  What kind of networking hardware do you run?  I'm using a linksys router with Tomato on it.

Asus 66U, dd-wrt. I doubt that's the difference, though. Btw, I jinxed myself. One of the units spontaneously shut off today for several hours until I noticed it (so 800GH for several hours). A software reboot fixed things...  but still concerning.

[HASS2WEB]

Hi     how do you get on the interface password area    thanks in advance

[dominic25]

I've got 3 rigs that all report 1.5-1.7 locally but only get 3.9 on any pool.  Anyone else experience this?

Thus far, I have only seen GMaxwell say that he can achieve the same hashrate as the interface claims.   Everyone else who has posted seems to be in the 1.3-1.45 TH/s range for each unit.   I believe Con addressed this already too.

I have got up to 1.5

Is that an average on one machine for a period of days or do you mean "every now and then it spikes up?"

12 hours. But the machine reports much higher....

My unit's built-in dashboard reports 1600 GH/s.  My pool (btcguild) reports about 1580 GH/s.  My custom share-logging mining dashboard calculates the hashrate at 1570 GH/s (which is a three hour average based on submitted shares).

So they are all fairly consistent for me.

Ditto. Almost identical numbers. 1620 dashboard, 1580 pool-side (Eligius 12-hour rate) which has been steady for a week.

Interesting, I wonder what the differences are between people getting the same hashrate locally and on the pool and people seeing large differences.  What kind of networking hardware do you run?  I'm using a linksys router with Tomato on it.

Asus 66U, dd-wrt. I doubt that's the difference, though. Btw, I jinxed myself. One of the units spontaneously shut off today for several hours until I noticed it (so 800GH for several hours). A software reboot fixed things...  but still concerning.

When you said " A software reboot fixed things... " do you mean you restarted CGMiner?

[boozer]

When you said " A software reboot fixed things... " do you mean you restarted CGMiner?

I would guess he meant he accessed the machine via ssh and typed "reboot" to reboot the box.

[jjiimm_64]

has anyone here gotten a refund?  and how long did it take from the request?