And where does the Linux Foundation or the W3C "say anything about representing constituent members" anywhere on the webpages you mentioned? Or anywhere else, for that matter?
They want to get people to believe they are Bitcoin itself to get more donations.
That's what you say. Saying it over and over again doesn't make it true. Where's your evidence?
Because that is not what the Linux Foundation or w3C does.
Your quote is very difficult to understand. What exactly is it that the Linux Foundation and the W3C don't do?
If you mean "representing constituent members", I can tell you that that is precisely what they do.
If you mean "get people to believe they are Linux/the www", that is definitely not what they do, I agree.
But we already were beyond that, I was asking for evidence for your claim that the Bitcoin Foundation "want to get people to believe they are Bitcoin itself to get more donations".
That's a very tough accusation you're making, so you better back that up.
Anyone can see what the Foundation does by following their activities.
Finally, something we can agree on.
You have already stated you are too lazy to do that yourself and you demand I go through thousands of articles and categorize them for you or I am guilty of violating "netiquette."
Exactly. I demand that you back your claims with quotes. Otherwise, I will continue to reject them as having no substance whatsoever. I'm not asking anything of you I wouldn't ask from anybody else, including myself.
I also never said there was a "secret agenda."
Sorry for my wording, but maybe I misinterpreted your statement
They want to get people to believe they are Bitcoin itself to get more donations.
to mean that there was a "secret agenda of getting more donations"?
Care to elaborate what you actually meant? If not, I will keep to my wording.
This is significant misunderstanding about the mission of the Foundation and they do not do not much to correct it. Whenever anyone brings up these issues they are attacked with a bunch of hyperbolic and demonizing replies and the issue often don't get addressed. It looks like Jon Matonis is improving things a little and sometimes it may just be due to lack of resources but they are not open and not clear about their mission or activities.
I already know that you don't understand the mission of the Foundation. Yet, so far, you have not shown that anybody else suffers from that misunderstanding. All I can tell you over and over again is to read the fine mission statement. I've even copied and quoted parts of said statement here to spare you the hassle of clicking a link. If something is unclear, ask for clarification. Don't go out on a limb and make false accusations.
Our mission is to help people exchange resources and ideas more freely.
Do you really want me to copy and quote the whole text?
You can shill all day but all anyone needs to do is follow things by getting google alerts as I suggest and review the articles and quotes as they come out.
I already mentioned that I don't use twitter, reddit, youtube, facebook, you-name-your-preferred-"web two oh"-thingamagick.
I also avoid using google's services wherever I can, thank you.
