Bitcoin Forum
September 24, 2018, 01:03:14 AM *
News: ♦♦ New info! Bitcoin Core users absolutely must upgrade to previously-announced 0.16.3 [Torrent]. All Bitcoin users should temporarily trust confirmations slightly less. More info.
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 ... 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 [143] 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 ... 375 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [1050 TH] BitMinter.com [1% PPLNS,Pays TxFees +MergedMining,Stratum,GBT,vardiff]  (Read 834525 times)
Jcw188
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 532
Merit: 500

Carpe Diem


View Profile
April 24, 2013, 02:33:26 AM
 #2841

Sorry didn't mean to be rude but I was confused. Last block not showing as stale anymore but there is still one stale. How often does that happen?
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1537750994
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1537750994

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1537750994
Reply with quote  #2

1537750994
Report to moderator
1537750994
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1537750994

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1537750994
Reply with quote  #2

1537750994
Report to moderator
dtown
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 38
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 24, 2013, 03:04:23 AM
 #2842

Speaking of API, I noticed there are some JSON fields available on the web site when you are logged in.  For example, on the shifts json, when logged in you get access to your_score, your_rejected and your_accepted

Any chance you can add the headers API key support to the shifts JSON to allow visibility to user specific data without actually having to log in?  Doing the same for the blocks JSON for block level reward data would be amazing too.

Thanks for your hard work! 
philipma1957
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2226
Merit: 1338


Avalon 841 rocks


View Profile
April 24, 2013, 09:39:34 AM
 #2843

No, the network hash rate doesn't affect the pool block rate.
You seem to have added that in and then removed it in your calculations.
Your answer is correct, but the calculation is adding then removing variables.
The network difficulty it what matters.

To get the network difficulty use getinfo on bitcoind or http://blockchain.info/q/getdifficulty - call that D
If the pool hash rate is X TH/s

Then the expected average time for the pool to find a block is:

(D * 2^32) / (X * 10^12) seconds (i.e. a simple 2 number division of D and X)

So assuming the pool hash rate is 6.05TH/s

(8974296.01488785 * 2^32) / (6.05 * 10 ^ 12) = ~6371s or ~1hr 46min


Okay I know that difficulty  should be used not hashrate of the network ,but and here is my problem with using difficulty lets say the network hashrate is 71Th and difficulty  is 8974296.  Lets say 30 percent of the network drops off  but that bitminter has 0 dropoff.  This has happened more then once.  During the 30 percent dropoff  bitminter has 6Th out of 50Th I would think we get more blocks during the 30% drop off. I realize that difficulty stays stable for about 11 days while bitminter hash and network hash are in a flux state.  
 

So my logic was the current hashrate ratio of bitminter to network is more important then using the 11 day constant difficulty number.  My best case real world example is BTC guild is huge 30 out of 71 Th  lets say all of asicminers 8Th is with BTC guild and all is well.

 Bitminter is at 6Th the network is at 71Th.
.

 Our percent is 6/71 or 8.4 percent.  lets say asic miner's gear drops off do to a power issue since it is all with BTC guild Bitminter stays the same  6Th but the network drops off to 63Th  our percent is 6/63 or 9.5 percent.  So if asicminer was down for 1 day difficulty stays set at 8,974,296  but for practical purposes our network share rose from 8.4 to 9.5 percent.

 For instance Network  Hash  is   the following on :
April 19Th 58Th  
Apr 20Th 58Th    
Apr 21St 65Th  
April 22nd 80Th
 April 23rd 70Th
 April 24Th 75Th

Difficulty was constant .  For the sake of argument lets say bitminter's  hashrate flux was + or - 2%  while the network had larger swings due to Asicminer turning its gear on and off. Asicminer has about 8Th and I see big quick drops close to 8Th in the network.

 My method is never going to be exact since I am using 2 changing variables bitminer hashrate and network hashrate.  And I am not using the difficulty which is an eleven day(IIRC) constant. But my method should reflect the real share of blocks better if  bitminer's hashrate is more stable then the network's hashrate during the time sampled.

I mine alt coins with https://simplemining.net...
I see BTC as the super highway and alt coins as taxis and trucks needed to move transactions.
kano
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2576
Merit: 1054


Linux since 1997 RedHat 4


View Profile
April 24, 2013, 01:54:25 PM
 #2844

No, the network hash rate doesn't affect the pool block rate.
You seem to have added that in and then removed it in your calculations.
Your answer is correct, but the calculation is adding then removing variables.
The network difficulty it what matters.

To get the network difficulty use getinfo on bitcoind or http://blockchain.info/q/getdifficulty - call that D
If the pool hash rate is X TH/s

Then the expected average time for the pool to find a block is:

(D * 2^32) / (X * 10^12) seconds (i.e. a simple 2 number division of D and X)

So assuming the pool hash rate is 6.05TH/s

(8974296.01488785 * 2^32) / (6.05 * 10 ^ 12) = ~6371s or ~1hr 46min


Okay I know that difficulty  should be used not hashrate of the network ,but and here is my problem with using difficulty lets say the network hashrate is 71Th and difficulty  is 8974296.  Lets say 30 percent of the network drops off  but that bitminter has 0 dropoff.  This has happened more then once.  During the 30 percent dropoff  bitminter has 6Th out of 50Th I would think we get more blocks during the 30% drop off. I realize
...
No, you will not expect to find more blocks.
The ability to find a block is directly related to the difficulty, the network hash rate is not relevant.
If you happen to find some correlation, it's purely coincidental.

Pool: https://kano.is Here on Bitcointalk: Forum BTC: 1KanoPb8cKYqNrswjaA8cRDk4FAS9eDMLU
FreeNode IRC: irc.freenode.net channel #kano.is Majority developer of the ckpool code
Help keep Bitcoin secure by mining on pools with full block verification on all blocks - and NO empty blocks!
Jcw188
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 532
Merit: 500

Carpe Diem


View Profile
April 24, 2013, 02:03:49 PM
 #2845

what's going on now, just really bad luck?  block has been 10 hours
mdude77
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1540
Merit: 1001



View Profile
April 24, 2013, 02:17:13 PM
 #2846

what's going on now, just really bad luck?  block has been 10 hours

If pool hash rate doesn't increase proportionally to difficulty increases, there will be longer and longer blocks.

M

I mine at Kano's Pool because it pays the best and is completely transparent!  Come join me!
Jcw188
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 532
Merit: 500

Carpe Diem


View Profile
April 24, 2013, 03:18:02 PM
 #2847

ever hit 100% before on the CDF?  Huh
philipma1957
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2226
Merit: 1338


Avalon 841 rocks


View Profile
April 24, 2013, 04:42:26 PM
 #2848

no it can't hit 100%    99.99999999999999...... and on.

I mine alt coins with https://simplemining.net...
I see BTC as the super highway and alt coins as taxis and trucks needed to move transactions.
Cobrabee
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 14
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 24, 2013, 05:06:41 PM
 #2849

Can a pool abandon a block?  13 hours and counting, we're missing out on lucky and unlucky blocks of shorter duration...
Epoch
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 917
Merit: 1000



View Profile
April 24, 2013, 05:24:23 PM
 #2850

Can a pool abandon a block?  13 hours and counting, we're missing out on lucky and unlucky blocks of shorter duration...
There's no point. You have the same chance, in the next second, to solve a block that you have already been working on for 13 seconds as one you've been working on for 13 hours. Or 13 days for that matter. The chance of finding a solution within a given time window depends solely on pool hashrate and current difficulty; nothing else. 'History' plays no part.

Now, if something was suspected to be wrong with the server, then that is a different story and a restart can make sense.

BTC: 1DJVUnLuPA2bERTkyeir8bKn1eSoRCrYvx
NMC: NFcfHSBBnq622pAr1Xoh9KtnBPA5CUn6id
Isokivi
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 910
Merit: 1000


Items flashing here available at btctrinkets.com


View Profile WWW
April 24, 2013, 05:28:37 PM
 #2851

Quit panicking, this is variance. We've seen blocks last much longer in the past. There is nothing wrong with the pool. Miners of old can tell you about blocks lasting 48 hours.

Bitcoin trinkets now on my online store: btc trinkets.com <- Bitcoin Tiepins, cufflinks, lapel pins, keychains, card holders and challenge coins.
coinnewb
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 155
Merit: 100



View Profile
April 24, 2013, 05:54:26 PM
 #2852

Quit panicking, this is variance. We've seen blocks last much longer in the past. There is nothing wrong with the pool. Miners of old can tell you about blocks lasting 48 hours.

Pool hash rate was probably much lower then?  At any rate, I agree that it is what it is: variance.
DrHaribo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2464
Merit: 1019


Bitminter.com Operator


View Profile WWW
April 24, 2013, 08:52:40 PM
 #2853

Can a pool abandon a block?  13 hours and counting, we're missing out on lucky and unlucky blocks of shorter duration...

Mining bitcoins is like going through billions of lottery tickets. There's nothing to abandon, we're not staring at the same lottery ticket all this time. We just had some bad luck playing the lottery today.

Each hash your computer does is one lottery ticket. There is no progress towards completing a block. If your lottery ticket is not a winning ticket, then you throw it away, it's completely useless.

▶▶▶ Bitminter.com - Your trusted mining pool since 2011.
Zubilica
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 836
Merit: 1000



View Profile
April 25, 2013, 07:30:56 AM
 #2854

Can you give us ETA for Litecoin pool and miner . July - August - September ?

philipma1957
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2226
Merit: 1338


Avalon 841 rocks


View Profile
April 25, 2013, 02:55:35 PM
 #2855

Quit panicking, this is variance. We've seen blocks last much longer in the past. There is nothing wrong with the pool. Miners of old can tell you about blocks lasting 48 hours.

Pool hash rate was probably much lower then?  At any rate, I agree that it is what it is: variance.


 the almost 14 hour  block# 232949 time   13:57 =    1 block

  the next almost 14 hours   blocks # 232957 to 233037  time  14:26 =   13 blocks     


   
This comes to 14 blocks in 28 hours and 23 minutes.  Just about 1 block every 2 hours and 2 minutes.  We should be around 1 hour 46 minutes to 2 hours a block based on our hash against difficulty of 8.9 mill.

My point is it averages out both sets of blocks   are way off one is very bad luck one is very good luck. When averaged very close to normal numbers.

I mine alt coins with https://simplemining.net...
I see BTC as the super highway and alt coins as taxis and trucks needed to move transactions.
BlackPrapor
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 628
Merit: 500



View Profile
April 28, 2013, 07:21:31 AM
 #2856

I was thinking about bitminter's recent bad luck. Could it be because only on bitminter LP resets the work, every time a new nmc block is found, for bitcoin work as well? For example, on ozcoin you could have an option to ignore LP on namecoin blocks and continue working with "old" work until new block is found on bitcoin network. In theory, this shouldn't affect the chances, but in practice bitminter has a negative luck for some time now...or always below expected if you look at the reward graph on bitminter's website.

There is no place like 127.0.0.1
In blockchain we trust
Epoch
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 917
Merit: 1000



View Profile
April 28, 2013, 01:05:42 PM
 #2857

I was thinking about bitminter's recent bad luck. Could it be because only on bitminter LP resets the work, every time a new nmc block is found, for bitcoin work as well? For example, on ozcoin you could have an option to ignore LP on namecoin blocks and continue working with "old" work until new block is found on bitcoin network. In theory, this shouldn't affect the chances, but in practice bitminter has a negative luck for some time now...or always below expected if you look at the reward graph on bitminter's website.
You know the theory, so you've answered your own question. Resetting work (or bitcoind, or the server itself for that matter)  has no effect on the probability of finding a valid block. The chance to find a block depends on only 2 things: hashrate and difficulty.

BTC: 1DJVUnLuPA2bERTkyeir8bKn1eSoRCrYvx
NMC: NFcfHSBBnq622pAr1Xoh9KtnBPA5CUn6id
philipma1957
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2226
Merit: 1338


Avalon 841 rocks


View Profile
April 28, 2013, 01:08:28 PM
 #2858

Not sure if your idea is correct.
 A lot of people myself included struggle with this:

 1)the current difficulty is set still for 11 days.
2) the current network hash moves up and down constantly
3) bitminters hash moves up and down constantly

 I have been told by some heavy hitters that bitminters  Hash to current difficulty is what matters in assessment of luck. The rest of the network does not affect what bitminter should find in blocks in a day.  I don't quite understand this.  Right now we are hashing 5.5 out of the networks 74. and the difficulty is 8.9 mill.  While the diff has been at 8.9 the network hash had as much as 85Th hash and bitminter has has as high as 6.05th hash.

  5.5 divide by 74 is  .0743   our share of the network. difficulty is 8.9 mill

 6.05 divide by 84 is  .072   our share of the network. difficulty is 8.9 mill  

  so looking at the two examples I think the way the luck is calculated right now uses our hash against the difficulty. this would mean we should get more blocks with the 6.05  since it is larger then 5.5 and the difficulty is  constant.     While I see the consistency in this I think it is not accurate  since our network share is better  with the smaller  hash I would think we would get more blocks with   that number.

 Look at it from another viewpoint.  Lets say BTC guild the biggest pool had a technical issue crashes and the crash lasts 1 day. lets say it even affects the miners in it and they are all locked out for a day.  so for this day we are at 6th the network difficulty is set at 8.9 mill   but the network now has  40Th not 74TH.  so our share is 6 divide by 40 = .15     For this day I feel we would get more blocks then the day before when the network had 74Th and we had the same 6th.  I have been told this is not true since the hash of us is still 6 and the difficulty is still 8.9 mill.

But my training is accounting  not a programming or statistical degree.   I can say this 2 or 3 times when the network had a big drop off in hash and we did not drop we had great luck.

I mine alt coins with https://simplemining.net...
I see BTC as the super highway and alt coins as taxis and trucks needed to move transactions.
organofcorti
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2058
Merit: 1000


Poor impulse control.


View Profile WWW
April 28, 2013, 01:10:15 PM
 #2859

I was thinking about bitminter's recent bad luck. Could it be because only on bitminter LP resets the work, every time a new nmc block is found, for bitcoin work as well? For example, on ozcoin you could have an option to ignore LP on namecoin blocks and continue working with "old" work until new block is found on bitcoin network. In theory, this shouldn't affect the chances, but in practice bitminter has a negative luck for some time now...or always below expected if you look at the reward graph on bitminter's website.
You know the theory, so you've answered your own question. Resetting work (or bitcoind, or the server itself for that matter)  has no effect on the probability of finding a valid block. The chance to find a block depends on only 2 things: hashrate and difficulty.

Bitminters luck was better than median this week, and although the previous three weeks were worse median they weren't as bad as BTCGuild or Ozcoin.

Bitcoin network and pool analysis 12QxPHEuxDrs7mCyGSx1iVSozTwtquDB3r
follow @oocBlog for new post notifications
philipma1957
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2226
Merit: 1338


Avalon 841 rocks


View Profile
April 28, 2013, 01:13:29 PM
 #2860

I was thinking about bitminter's recent bad luck. Could it be because only on bitminter LP resets the work, every time a new nmc block is found, for bitcoin work as well? For example, on ozcoin you could have an option to ignore LP on namecoin blocks and continue working with "old" work until new block is found on bitcoin network. In theory, this shouldn't affect the chances, but in practice bitminter has a negative luck for some time now...or always below expected if you look at the reward graph on bitminter's website.
You know the theory, so you've answered your own question. Resetting work (or bitcoind, or the server itself for that matter)  has no effect on the probability of finding a valid block. The chance to find a block depends on only 2 things: hashrate and difficulty.
 


while typing my answer.   you mention hashrate and difficulty as the kings.

   not to disagree  but I don't still understand why our total network share does not affect our blocks.  

 seems to me 6 out of 70 will do better then 5.9 out of 80.  I  still fail  to understand and have tried to understand why this ratio does not apply in some way.  

I mine alt coins with https://simplemining.net...
I see BTC as the super highway and alt coins as taxis and trucks needed to move transactions.
Pages: « 1 ... 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 [143] 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 ... 375 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!