STRONGHANDS - Community Take Over - NEED MINERS

[bitcoinbabys]

trust it will not be a dump!! You just made a great investment!!

[1713959002]

1713959002

[brazilcoins]

here is the pic of my shnd balance
http://tinypic.com/r/w1pw84/9

i hope thats 12million coins of shnd ?

[bitcoinbabys]

here is the pic of my shnd balance
http://tinypic.com/r/w1pw84/9

i hope thats 12million coins of shnd ?

yes that is correct 12mill shnd

[brazilcoins]

i have joined in promoting the coins too.
if it dumps i will be screwed as my friends will laugh hard at me.

what is the future like?

[bitcoinbabys]

i have joined in promoting the coins too.
if it dumps i will be screwed as my friends will laugh hard at me.

what is the future like?

dont worry youll have the last laugh! big things to come!!!

[RealmSolutions]

After almost 24 hours later, the sync is complete and my coins showed up! PHEW...

[HarryAnsour]

Hey Dev.
So I'm  promoting this coin via social media, YouTube,  so on, but one question is truly bothering me.
Little over a week ago when total supply has changed in CMC from 11billion to 12 trillion,  it was looks like this.
12,019,006,301,119 , today i see 12,450,856,381,789 .
So in 7 days 400 billion more coins?
Can someone please explain?

[kompi]

It's incredible how this coin is getting more and more popularity: a lot of group and supports...even before the announcement by the devs...I think (and hope  ) that in the future after some improvements it could even reach doge level...who knows

[Mrtree420]

If you want the price to go up will need to burn trillions of coins that should make the price pick up. Look at all the other coin burns. Just food for thought...

[Mrtree420]

Another thing does anyone have a bootstrap to speed up the wallet syncing? 

[Flamed]

Let me be clear.

There will never be any coin burn on this coin.
There will never be any coin swap on this coin.

The original dev is gone but the coin is alive, it's in the same state as Bitcoin.
You won't reach any consensus on burning coin and the same goes for swap unless the blockchain is dead. It's not the case here. That's what decentralization is about. Bumba is  a competent dev but the coin is far beyond him or the original dev. As said above 70% of nodes are japanese.
As long as a minimal amount of nodes agrees to run on whatever version it will go as it is.

The only solution is a hard fork issuing the new coins for free and at prorata Like BTC or NXT are doing also called a snapshot. That's how it works for a decentralized blockchain. It will be called called SHND2 or + or whatever but Stronghands "vanilla" will continue to work as long as the blockchain is alive. That's the only way.

[crowplayer]

News about new exchangers?

[geterod]

Let me be clear.

There will never be any coin burn on this coin.
There will never be any coin swap on this coin.

The original dev is gone but the coin is alive, it's in the same state as Bitcoin.
You won't reach any consensus on burning coin and the same goes for swap unless the blockchain is dead. It's not the case here. That's what decentralization is about. Bumba is  a competent dev but the coin is far beyond him or the original dev. As said above 70% of nodes are japanese.
As long as a minimal amount of nodes agrees to run on whatever version it will go as it is.

The only solution is a hard fork issuing the new coins for free and at prorata Like BTC or NXT are doing also called a snapshot. That's how it works for a decentralized blockchain. It will be called called SHND2 or + or whatever but Stronghands "vanilla" will continue to work as long as the blockchain is alive. That's the only way.

       
but the PAC coin is the same: there are also nodes, also a new owner ... But they have a fork .. Answer ...

[geterod]

If I lay down the coins SHND wallet, then every month I will have a reward of 100%? This is not cheating? Can you trust this?

[Flamed]

 but the PAC coin is the same: there are also nodes, also a new owner ... But they have a fork .. Answer ...

I don't know what the history of PAC is but what I say still stand. At some point they just reached consensus "thanks" to either super low market cap or/and a fatal flaw in the code wich required a hardfork. Wich is neither the case for SHND. The devs on PAC are not the "owners" of the coin the owners are the people holding the coin, the nodes and the consensus on the market. A dev can only offer "enhancement" in the code and see if the community follows him. It's how open source works too.

Bumba was the unofficial dev for SHND for a long time thanks to him. But the title of this thread is a bit misleading it was created after the big surge in price to a 40M+$ market cap with a worldwide community (or users). So you can't claim a community take over on a very alive coin with multiple languages users on BTCtalk just like this (not anymore). You don't revive an alive coin.

Here SHND is working well with activity on the market. So noone will burn the coin swap it or "update" to a newer version if they are satisfied with the current one. You can't force consensus in a distribued ledger system. Otherwise it's not really you know... decentralized.
If you have a different vision you do as BTCCash did: snapshot and then issue the new coin for free and let the market decides the faith of both  coins (or way more now in BTC's case).
TLDR: if SHND is working well how can you force nodes to change version (requiring HF) if they don't want ? Answer: you can't. See BTC in 2017.

[brazilcoins]

$0.000003 USD (-78.88%)
2.307e-10 BTC (-79.81%)


thats coinmarket cap of shnd now.
is the coin dumping or what?

[geterod]

 but the PAC coin is the same: there are also nodes, also a new owner ... But they have a fork .. Answer ...

I don't know what the history of PAC is but what I say still stand. At some point they just reached consensus "thanks" to either super low market cap or/and a fatal flaw in the code wich required a hardfork. Wich is neither the case for SHND. The devs on PAC are not the "owners" of the coin the owners are the people holding the coin, the nodes and the consensus on the market. A dev can only offer "enhancement" in the code and see if the community follows him. It's how open source works too.
Here SHND is working well with activity on the market. So noone will burn the coin swap it or "update" to a newer version if they are satisfied with the current one. You can't force consensus in a distribued ledger system. Otherwise it's not really you know... decentralized.
If you have a different vision you do has BTCCash did: snapshot and then issue the new coin for free and let the market decides the faith of both  coins (or way more now in BTC's case).
TLDR: if SHND is working well how can you force nodes to change version (requiring HF) if they don't wan't ? Answer: you can't. See BTC in 2017.

    If I lay down the coins SHND wallet, then every month I will have a reward of 100%? This is not cheating? Can you trust this?

[Flamed]

 If I lay down the coins SHND wallet, then every month I will have a reward of 100%? This is not cheating? Can you trust this?

First page of this topic OP's post:

"PoS - min stake age - 30 days
PoS - Reward 100%"

It's the specs of this coin, what is that you don't understand ?

[geterod]

 If I lay down the coins SHND wallet, then every month I will have a reward of 100%? This is not cheating? Can you trust this?

First page of this topic OP's post:

"PoS - min stake age - 30 days
PoS - Reward 100%"

It's the specs of this coin, what is that you don't understand ?

     
I'm glad your answer. I got enthusiasm and I will buy the coins of SHND. Then this is a very good investment. We will all move forward and higher!

[brazilcoins]

$0.000003 USD (-78.88%)
2.307e-10 BTC (-79.81%)


thats coinmarket cap of shnd now.
is the coin dumping or what?