buffalobuffalo
Newbie
 Offline
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
|
 |
February 06, 2018, 06:45:08 PM |
|
We have manually updated the difficulty as we were stuck on the block 10801.
Everyone running nodes, should update again. (git pull)
The miners should also be updated to the latest versions.
@draceus0 The expected hashrate for a i7 7700k is between 8 and 11. If you're getting only 3, there's a problem in your config. Try more hashers.
As a comparison, a GTX1080 should be getting around 21-24H/s atm.
Do no be alarmed by the new low hashrates, they are low for everyone and that's what was expected.
I'm at ~1.5 on an i7-4790k. Is that about what I should expect? When you say there could be a problem in config, how would you check that? Which miner are you using? If it's java, delete the old config. If it's php, you need to open more instances (1 per thread). I get around 5.6 on PHP , 6.2 on Java and on the auto miner I get like 1 H/s Not sure how to get the 8-11 H/s you said possible on i7 7700k I'm on PHP/Auto-Miner. I didn't realize I could open more instances. So I will have multiple instances of ~1.3-5? Is your 5.2 added instances or just one miner going at a time? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You get merit points when someone likes your post enough to give you some. And for every 2 merit points you receive, you can send 1 merit point to someone else!
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
draceus0
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 33
Merit: 0
|
|
February 06, 2018, 06:54:04 PM |
|
We have manually updated the difficulty as we were stuck on the block 10801.
Everyone running nodes, should update again. (git pull)
The miners should also be updated to the latest versions.
@draceus0 The expected hashrate for a i7 7700k is between 8 and 11. If you're getting only 3, there's a problem in your config. Try more hashers.
As a comparison, a GTX1080 should be getting around 21-24H/s atm.
Do no be alarmed by the new low hashrates, they are low for everyone and that's what was expected.
I'm at ~1.5 on an i7-4790k. Is that about what I should expect? When you say there could be a problem in config, how would you check that? Which miner are you using? If it's java, delete the old config. If it's php, you need to open more instances (1 per thread). I get around 5.6 on PHP , 6.2 on Java and on the auto miner I get like 1 H/s Not sure how to get the 8-11 H/s you said possible on i7 7700k I'm on PHP/Auto-Miner. I didn't realize I could open more instances. So I will have multiple instances of ~1.3-5? Is your 5.2 added instances or just one miner going at a time? Thats just one instance |
|
|
|
|
binlist
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
|
|
February 06, 2018, 07:37:18 PM |
|
mined for 83 minutes, 2.5 h/s, found 1 share and it got rejected lol, using java-miner
|
|
|
|
|
programmerdan
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 29
Merit: 1
|
|
February 06, 2018, 08:11:52 PM |
|
I get around 5.6 on PHP , 6.2 on Java and on the auto miner I get like 1 H/s
Not sure how to get the 8-11 H/s you said possible on i7 7700k
I get 11.25h/s on i7-7700k Config: Linux Mint 18.3 locally compiled (follow "advanced installation" instructions for linux) argon2i library 8 hashers Using: https://github.com/ProgrammerDan/arionum-java/releases/tag/0.2.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
JustMe22
|
|
February 06, 2018, 08:58:48 PM |
|
We have manually updated the difficulty as we were stuck on the block 10801.
Everyone running nodes, should update again. (git pull)
The miners should also be updated to the latest versions.
@draceus0 The expected hashrate for a i7 7700k is between 8 and 11. If you're getting only 3, there's a problem in your config. Try more hashers.
As a comparison, a GTX1080 should be getting around 21-24H/s atm.
Do no be alarmed by the new low hashrates, they are low for everyone and that's what was expected.
I'm at ~1.5 on an i7-4790k. Is that about what I should expect? When you say there could be a problem in config, how would you check that? Which miner are you using? If it's java, delete the old config. If it's php, you need to open more instances (1 per thread). Maybe you can make some code changing dev to set up how many threads to run on the miner, maybe something in the configuration file, coz if you have like me 40 threads and i need to open 40 instances and is not to comfortable. |
|
|
|
|
Namiks
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 292
Merit: 252
I miss when crypto was about decentralisation.
|
|
February 06, 2018, 09:16:37 PM |
|
We have manually updated the difficulty as we were stuck on the block 10801.
Everyone running nodes, should update again. (git pull)
The miners should also be updated to the latest versions.
@draceus0 The expected hashrate for a i7 7700k is between 8 and 11. If you're getting only 3, there's a problem in your config. Try more hashers.
As a comparison, a GTX1080 should be getting around 21-24H/s atm.
Do no be alarmed by the new low hashrates, they are low for everyone and that's what was expected.
I'm at ~1.5 on an i7-4790k. Is that about what I should expect? When you say there could be a problem in config, how would you check that? Which miner are you using? If it's java, delete the old config. If it's php, you need to open more instances (1 per thread). Maybe you can make some code changing dev to set up how many threads to run on the miner, maybe something in the configuration file, coz if you have like me 40 threads and i need to open 40 instances and is not to comfortable. I believe the Java miner solves that issue; may be wrong. |
Crypto was created to liberate the individual. Decentralisation matters.
|
|
|
fonship
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 893
Merit: 135
Bitcoin is not a currency or asset. Its a MOVEMENT
|
|
February 06, 2018, 09:40:45 PM |
|
My miner never stopped and still working with same speed. am i mining old chain?
anything i need to change?
|
selling sushistake.com, send offers
|
|
|
draceus0
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 33
Merit: 0
|
|
February 06, 2018, 11:33:33 PM |
|
I get around 5.6 on PHP , 6.2 on Java and on the auto miner I get like 1 H/s
Not sure how to get the 8-11 H/s you said possible on i7 7700k
I get 11.25h/s on i7-7700k Config: Linux Mint 18.3 locally compiled (follow "advanced installation" instructions for linux) argon2i library 8 hashers Using: https://github.com/ProgrammerDan/arionum-java/releases/tag/0.2.2Im on windows. Perhaps thats the problem |
|
|
|
|
fonship
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 893
Merit: 135
Bitcoin is not a currency or asset. Its a MOVEMENT
|
|
February 07, 2018, 04:23:04 AM |
|
I get around 5.6 on PHP , 6.2 on Java and on the auto miner I get like 1 H/s
Not sure how to get the 8-11 H/s you said possible on i7 7700k
I get 11.25h/s on i7-7700k Config: Linux Mint 18.3 locally compiled (follow "advanced installation" instructions for linux) argon2i library 8 hashers Using: https://github.com/ProgrammerDan/arionum-java/releases/tag/0.2.2Im on windows. Perhaps thats the problem Earlier i was getting 54H/S and now with new miner AVX2 i am getting 4.5 H/S, on windows 10 OS. Is this what is expected? |
selling sushistake.com, send offers
|
|
|
|
JoenNL
|
|
February 07, 2018, 07:18:22 AM
Last edit: February 07, 2018, 08:06:28 AM by JoenNL |
|
I get around 5.6 on PHP , 6.2 on Java and on the auto miner I get like 1 H/s
Not sure how to get the 8-11 H/s you said possible on i7 7700k
I get 11.25h/s on i7-7700k Config: Linux Mint 18.3 locally compiled (follow "advanced installation" instructions for linux) argon2i library 8 hashers Using: https://github.com/ProgrammerDan/arionum-java/releases/tag/0.2.2But how is that possible that u guys are going so slow (or i am looking wrong..) I get on 1x i7 2600: 43 H/s (with 2x the auto-miner opened) With 1x auto-miner i get 33-34H/s I am using the standard miner inside the ARO folder (php miner). Info: i am using the first release from this coin (maybe that's wrong, am i really mining? I get some shares just like before..) Windows 10 Pro When i look to the ''newest'' Windows Bundle, only 2 files are edited; miner.php on 5 februari, LightArionumCLI on 6 februari, all other files has not been changed, correct? Oké, so dev tell me.. I updated the 2 files (well, i changed all files to the newest version) and now i get 1.1H/s  So i was going from 34H/s (i tought standard 4 threads) to 1.1H/s (this is 1 thread for what i can see, so i can open the miner 4 times and i get like 5H/s) ?  I guess this is not a good thing? I did read your post above that the lower speed is ''normall'', you also say that's for everybody. But, a little hour ago i was getting 30x more speed. So if i just replace the files to the old files i am going faster while using the same power consumption? Is there a reason why i should not use the old miner what is 30x faster? If the old, and faster miner got problems so the newer version is important to use, add that to the openingspost. The openingspost just don't have enough info (well, it almost got no information). I have to read every page in the hope i can see a reaction what can help me (not good for people what dont have 24/7 the time to read all the posts in every topic on every page). |
|
|
|
Smutsen
Member
Offline
Activity: 73
Merit: 11
|
|
February 07, 2018, 08:42:19 AM |
|
Did anyone get a payout from pool after the fork? I am mining on the new miner for more than 12 hours and got zero.
|
|
|
|
|
sgaragagghu
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 72
Merit: 2
|
|
February 07, 2018, 11:36:58 AM |
|
We would like to proudly announce Arionum, a new cryptocurrency built from scratch!
Hi i did a telegram group: https://t.me/arionum_aroPlease add it in first page and join if you want  |
|
|
|
|
|
sido
|
|
February 07, 2018, 01:07:15 PM |
|
Did anyone get a payout from pool after the fork? I am mining on the new miner for more than 12 hours and got zero.
I can confirm |
|
|
|
|
AroDev (OP)
Copper Member
Member
Offline
Activity: 130
Merit: 17
|
|
February 07, 2018, 01:27:31 PM |
|
After the fork, as previously said, the mining algorithm has been changed and the new hash rates are lower on the new algo (for everyone).
Do not be afraid of smaller H/s, it brings the same results as it did before the fork with higher H/s.
If you haven't updated your miner, keep in mind your work will be rejected by the pool and you will not be able to earn ARO.
My recommendation as a miner is to use Dan's java miner!
|
|
|
|
|
|
rossr1
|
|
February 07, 2018, 02:34:45 PM |
|
After the fork, as previously said, the mining algorithm has been changed and the new hash rates are lower on the new algo (for everyone).
Do not be afraid of smaller H/s, it brings the same results as it did before the fork with higher H/s.
If you haven't updated your miner, keep in mind your work will be rejected by the pool and you will not be able to earn ARO.
My recommendation as a miner is to use Dan's java miner!
Not used a java miner before, where can i locate instructions to use it? thanks! |
|
|
|
|
AroDev (OP)
Copper Member
Member
Offline
Activity: 130
Merit: 17
|
|
February 07, 2018, 03:08:03 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
draceus0
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 33
Merit: 0
|
|
February 07, 2018, 03:28:12 PM |
|
Which one of those is the best to download and what are the differences? |
|
|
|
|
programmerdan
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 29
Merit: 1
|
|
February 07, 2018, 06:35:29 PM |
|
Which one of those is the best to download and what are the differences? The short answer -- the one that fits what your hardware can use. Most AMD hardware has at least AVX support; some, AVX2. Most recent Intel Hardware has AVX2 support; some has AVX512f -- use it if yours does. Check with your CPU manufacturer (Intel Ark for instance shows all hardware features for each Intel CPU) to see which extensions you can use. All hardware should be able to run the generic. Some older hardware with AVX support might run faster using "generic" -- the plain arionum-miner-java.exe which is for any Windows system. Please note that there is a hard requirement for 64bit JRE for all versions. As to what is better -- AVX is a kind of vector operation extension. AVX2 doubles the size of the vectors useable. AVX512f as used in this lib, doubles the size of the vector again. Each _can_ represent about 20% speedboost; although sometimes due to other hardware optimizations AVX isn't faster then Generic build. |
|
|
|
|
draceus0
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 33
Merit: 0
|
|
February 07, 2018, 06:56:14 PM |
|
Which one of those is the best to download and what are the differences? The short answer -- the one that fits what your hardware can use. Most AMD hardware has at least AVX support; some, AVX2. Most recent Intel Hardware has AVX2 support; some has AVX512f -- use it if yours does. Check with your CPU manufacturer (Intel Ark for instance shows all hardware features for each Intel CPU) to see which extensions you can use. All hardware should be able to run the generic. Some older hardware with AVX support might run faster using "generic" -- the plain arionum-miner-java.exe which is for any Windows system. Please note that there is a hard requirement for 64bit JRE for all versions. As to what is better -- AVX is a kind of vector operation extension. AVX2 doubles the size of the vectors useable. AVX512f as used in this lib, doubles the size of the vector again. Each _can_ represent about 20% speedboost; although sometimes due to other hardware optimizations AVX isn't faster then Generic build. Thanks for a good explanation! Having some issues though trying to run it with more than 4 hashers. Trying to run with 7 hashers gives me the following issue: You have 8 processors vs. 7 hashers. Update transitioned to new block. Best DL on last block: 9223372036854775807 Difficulty updated to 140710818. New Block Height: 11339. Node: http://aropool.com MinDL: 100000 BestDL: 9223372036854775807 Block Height: 11339 Time on Block: 0s Inverse Difficulty: 140710818 Updates: Last 1518029296s: 0 Failed: 0 Avg Update RTT: 0ms Shares: Attempted: 0 Rejected: 0 Eff: 100.00% Avg Hash/nonce: 0 Avg Submit RTT: 0ms Overall: Hashes: 0 Mining Time: 0s Avg Speed: 0.000H/s Reported Speed: NaNH/s Streams Runs H/run Cur H/s Cur TiC% Cur WL% Argon % Sha % Shares Finds Reject Thread HashMasher-5 could not immediately reserve a core, it may experience decayed performance. 5 1 10 12.23 88.95 1.230 99.959 0.032 0 0 0 Thread HashMasher-6 could not immediately reserve a core, it may experience decayed performance. Thread HashMasher-7 could not immediately reserve a core, it may experience decayed performance. 7 4 2 11.52 92.45 0.313 99.979 0.015 0 0 0 7 15 2 5.87 93.11 0.012 99.994 0.002 0 0 0 Also puts my hashrate at around 5.9 with the i7 7700k which should apparently produce 8-11 H/s. Any idea how to fix this? |
|
|
|
|
|
kiddo
|
|
February 07, 2018, 07:19:48 PM |
|
Is there any change in the block spacing, because I see from block 11345 to 11355 only 24s/32s/68s/12s/50s/59s/78s/etc
|
|
|
|
|
|
