Analysis

[findftp]

For me, it looks like we are in September of 2011.

For me we already surpassed December 2011.
It also rhymes with the block reward halving somewhere next year.

Basically I compare 3 day chart 2009-2012 with the weekly chart from 2012-2015.
DMI and RSI also rhymes.

If I'm wrong I'll end up being a bag holder .
But boy, what a ride it was...

[1713929954]

1713929954

[1713929954]

1713929954

[molecular]

Either bitcoin is an Investment commodity (the ultimate one!) that you hold and speculate on
Or internet *stable* cash money that you you keep on spending

But the latter is not synonym with moonlanding.

And thinking you can have both is ATH delusions.

I don't need to have both at the same time. Alternatingly is fine with me.

[600watt]

Either bitcoin is an Investment commodity (the ultimate one!) that you hold and speculate on
Or internet *stable* cash money that you you keep on spending

But the latter is not synonym with moonlanding.

And thinking you can have both is ATH delusions.

I don't need to have both at the same time. Alternatingly is fine with me.

+1

it depends on internet cash money for how many users(?). if a billion people decide to use it, price has to go to the moon.

if it stays an investment commodity for a few 100k speculators, price may go to the moon.

[notme]

Either bitcoin is an Investment commodity (the ultimate one!) that you hold and speculate on
Or internet *stable* cash money that you you keep on spending

But the latter is not synonym with moonlanding.

And thinking you can have both is ATH delusions.

I don't need to have both at the same time. Alternatingly is fine with me.

+1

it depends on internet cash money for how many users(?). if a billion people decide to use it, price has to go to the moon.

if it stays an investment commodity for a few 100k speculators, price may go to the moon.

If a billion people decided to use it for internet cash money we would need MUCH larger blocks.

[hdbuck]

Either bitcoin is an Investment commodity (the ultimate one!) that you hold and speculate on
Or internet *stable* cash money that you you keep on spending

But the latter is not synonym with moonlanding.

And thinking you can have both is ATH delusions.

I don't need to have both at the same time. Alternatingly is fine with me.

+1

it depends on internet cash money for how many users(?). if a billion people decide to use it, price has to go to the moon.

if it stays an investment commodity for a few 100k speculators, price may go to the moon.

you have to consider the latter is so less probable tho considering bitcoin's past, but rather young (i'll concede this to you) history.. bitcoin price has mainly been driven from investors and speculators until now rather than some mass adoption or retail bs.

the point being there is no incentive to drop the first, giving up decentralization et al. just based on the hope and *ifs/may/blablabluh* to catch the second.. especially considering the high uncertainty regarding the rest of the financial world nowadays.

that's all.

[seleme]

Some nice move is coiling, I guess. It's flat as Bitcoin.

[Eivind Nag]

Either bitcoin is an Investment commodity (the ultimate one!) that you hold and speculate on
Or internet *stable* cash money that you you keep on spending

But the latter is not synonym with moonlanding.

And thinking you can have both is ATH delusions.

I don't need to have both at the same time. Alternatingly is fine with me.

+1

it depends on internet cash money for how many users(?). if a billion people decide to use it, price has to go to the moon.

if it stays an investment commodity for a few 100k speculators, price may go to the moon.

If a billion people decided to use it for internet cash money we would need MUCH larger blocks.

I found this comment on Reddit to be quite thought provoking regarding block size. It brought a perspective i never though about.

https://np.reddit.com/r/bitcoinxt/comments/3hyb1l/it_seems_like_theres_a_nonetrivial_number_of/cuc4hj6


 

[Bassica]

Guys, really, please take this discussion elsewhere.

I come here to read Masterluc's TA. This rule used to be enforced and respected. For some reason this debate above has been going on multiple pages now. There's an enormous forum out there where you could and this is discussed in great lenght. Discuss all you want, just DON'T do it in this topic.

[Monopoly]

Either bitcoin is an Investment commodity (the ultimate one!) that you hold and speculate on
Or internet *stable* cash money that you you keep on spending

But the latter is not synonym with moonlanding.

And thinking you can have both is ATH delusions.

I don't need to have both at the same time. Alternatingly is fine with me.

+1

it depends on internet cash money for how many users(?). if a billion people decide to use it, price has to go to the moon.

if it stays an investment commodity for a few 100k speculators, price may go to the moon.

If &  if & If ... .So many If .....

Yes if many things will happened the bitcoin will go to the moon ....

The problem is nothing happens except crashing .........

[podyx]

Either bitcoin is an Investment commodity (the ultimate one!) that you hold and speculate on
Or internet *stable* cash money that you you keep on spending

But the latter is not synonym with moonlanding.

And thinking you can have both is ATH delusions.

Why could it not be both?

[secousa]

Guys, really, please take this discussion elsewhere.

I come here to read Masterluc's TA. This rule used to be enforced and respected. For some reason this debate above has been going on multiple pages now. There's an enormous forum out there where you could and this is discussed in great lenght. Discuss all you want, just DON'T do it in this topic.

This guy gets it.

EVERYONE ELSE STFU and take it elsewhere please.

[masterluc]

Did some metrics, looks legit.

[SmoothCurves]

Did some metrics, looks legit.

So, what's next? Wave I ?

[masterluc]

So, what's next? Wave I ?

It will be a looong story.... 1 I will recognize in running 3. Its a three-five years.

[Fakhoury]

So, what's next? Wave I ?

It will be a looong story.... 1 I will recognize in running 3. Its a three-five years.

Could you elaborate more on that bolded part please.

[masterluc]

Could you elaborate more on that bolded part please.

I may claim without doubt "This was 1" in a time of running 3.

[Fakhoury]

Could you elaborate more on that bolded part please.

I may claim without doubt "This was 1" in a time of running 3.

So the Historical III may be within 3-5 years ?

[masterluc]

So the Historical III may be within 3-5 years ?

End of Historical III may be in more than 3-5 years. It is running.

[rjclarke2000]

I understand none of this and I want to.

Can someone with knowledge and a bit of spare time explain this please? ^^

[Fakhoury]

So the Historical III may be within 3-5 years ?

End of Historical III may be in more than 3-5 years. It is running.

Got it, so what you want say basically is, we are in Wave 1 in a running Wave III, am I right ?