Bitcoin Forum
April 25, 2024, 09:08:27 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 [215] 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 ... 334 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Analysis  (Read 941375 times)
lebing
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1288
Merit: 1000

Enabling the maximal migration


View Profile
May 02, 2016, 08:23:31 PM
 #4281

Great to see you back Luc!

We all missed you.

I want to reiterate something I think was implied but never explicitly said before:

We don't expect you to always be right. You don't wear the brunt of our losses on your shoulders if you make a bad call. This responsibility is ours and ours alone.
We simply appreciate you for your elliot wave gift and whether we choose to integrate that into our own final decisions is our call alone.

Keep doing what you do so well!

 Wink

Bro, do you even blockchain?
-E Voorhees
There are several different types of Bitcoin clients. The most secure are full nodes like Bitcoin Core, which will follow the rules of the network no matter what miners do. Even if every miner decided to create 1000 bitcoins per block, full nodes would stick to the rules and reject those blocks.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714036107
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714036107

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714036107
Reply with quote  #2

1714036107
Report to moderator
1714036107
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714036107

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714036107
Reply with quote  #2

1714036107
Report to moderator
1714036107
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714036107

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714036107
Reply with quote  #2

1714036107
Report to moderator
hdbuck
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1002



View Profile
May 15, 2016, 01:49:56 AM
 #4282

slowly but surely..

Fakhoury
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1027


Permabull Bitcoin Investor


View Profile
May 15, 2016, 02:28:56 AM
 #4283

slowly but surely..



Everything when it takes it's own time, becomes wounderful Smiley

Quote from:  Satoshi Nakamoto
Feb. 14, 2010: I’m sure that in 20 years there will either be very large transaction volume or no volume.
ImI
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1946
Merit: 1019



View Profile
May 15, 2016, 02:33:51 AM
 #4284


volume looks pretty shitty though

wouldnt be surprised if we break that nice uptrend and test 370 again. lots of bullish expectations and barely any volume.
RyNinDaCleM
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2408
Merit: 1009


Legen -wait for it- dary


View Profile
May 15, 2016, 03:17:17 AM
 #4285


volume looks pretty shitty though

wouldnt be surprised if we break that nice uptrend and test 370 again. lots of bullish expectations and barely any volume.

When triangles break out, they break violently. This is pretty tame for a triangle that lasted ~6 months.  Undecided

klee
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1498
Merit: 1000



View Profile
May 15, 2016, 07:23:57 AM
 #4286

I see 3 pages of bullish topics in Speculation...  Undecided
Tzupy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2128
Merit: 1074



View Profile
May 15, 2016, 04:47:20 PM
 #4287


volume looks pretty shitty though

wouldnt be surprised if we break that nice uptrend and test 370 again. lots of bullish expectations and barely any volume.

Testing 370$ would trigger a bearish flip of the weekly PSAR.


Sometimes, if it looks too bullish, it's actually bearish
marcus_of_augustus
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3920
Merit: 2348


Eadem mutata resurgo


View Profile
May 29, 2016, 12:40:03 PM
 #4288


volume looks pretty shitty though

wouldnt be surprised if we break that nice uptrend and test 370 again. lots of bullish expectations and barely any volume.

When triangles break out, they break violently. This is pretty tame for a triangle that lasted ~6 months.  Undecided

... and this?

Wexlike
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1473
Merit: 1086



View Profile
May 29, 2016, 12:59:53 PM
 #4289

Funny how things can change in just two weeks.
Tzupy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2128
Merit: 1074



View Profile
May 29, 2016, 01:45:12 PM
 #4290

Funny how things can change in just two weeks days.

FTFY. Wink

Sometimes, if it looks too bullish, it's actually bearish
BTCtrader71
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 784
Merit: 1001



View Profile
May 29, 2016, 07:16:05 PM
 #4291

Even DanV is bullish, as of 3 hours ago.

https://www.tradingview.com/chart/BTCUSD/DlxDNrQ6-Bitcoin-In-Double-Zigzag-Correction-Bullish-Bias/

BTC: 14oTcy1DNEXbcYjzPBpRWV11ZafWxNP8EU
RyNinDaCleM
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2408
Merit: 1009


Legen -wait for it- dary


View Profile
May 29, 2016, 07:43:49 PM
 #4292


LOL that is about as bullish as I am. smh
It's true that all you have to do is draw arrows pointing up and everyone will suck your balls. What he isn't showing is the arrow pointing down when his count completes in the area of 685-720 which (OMG!1!), is the same area I have in the charts I've posted recently and everyone calls me a troll...



Too funny...

Wexlike
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1473
Merit: 1086



View Profile
May 29, 2016, 07:52:57 PM
 #4293

No one with a brain is calling you a troll, Ryn.

But it's hard to imagine bitcoin at around ~100$ in 2018.
RyNinDaCleM
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2408
Merit: 1009


Legen -wait for it- dary


View Profile
May 29, 2016, 08:02:30 PM
 #4294

No one with a brain is calling you a troll, Ryn.

But it's hard to imagine bitcoin at around ~100$ in 2018.

That is a path, not a target. I can only begin to find a target for that point after the rise completes. And that would still only be a preliminary target. The thing is is that as the rise gets higher, the higher that target gets.

I removed the arrow pointing down.


Now it's less threatening.   Wink

Wexlike
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1473
Merit: 1086



View Profile
May 29, 2016, 08:45:21 PM
 #4295

This looks much better! You are such a bull. Wink
RyNinDaCleM
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2408
Merit: 1009


Legen -wait for it- dary


View Profile
May 29, 2016, 08:45:57 PM
 #4296

This looks much better! You are such a bull. Wink

That's all I'm asking Cry

BldSwtTrs
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 861
Merit: 1010


View Profile
May 29, 2016, 09:31:49 PM
 #4297

Ryn, what makes you think this run won't pass the old ATH?
zimmah
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1106
Merit: 1005



View Profile
May 29, 2016, 11:32:19 PM
 #4298

No one with a brain is calling you a troll, Ryn.

But it's hard to imagine bitcoin at around ~100$ in 2018.

because it won't happen
davidorentol
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 144
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 03, 2016, 02:34:58 AM
 #4299


No one with a brain is calling you a troll, Ryn.

But it's hard to imagine bitcoin at around ~100$ in 2018.

because it won't happen


sure




That chart was more to show the time aspect of a large wave-II versus the smaller degree but potentially complete wave-(4) of III. The finer resolution count is what I was referring to. Something like this


If it wasn't a (4) of III as it is in the bottom pic of that link, then I have no option for a bull market to new highs before making new lows or at least getting a full impulse lower (but still truncated) with a bullish looking rise from the lows (not any of this high volume for the initial bounce and then quickly dying off through the rest of the rise nonsense). As Tzupy said, the B kind of fell short and though it's not exactly invalidated as a count, it seems much less likely now... The highest high since January and yet indicators are showing a bearish divergence. Not good for those currently bullish. 
davidorentol
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 144
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 03, 2016, 02:45:16 AM
 #4300

The bad analisis and the Reality......






Pages: « 1 ... 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 [215] 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 ... 334 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!