[ANN][POOL] ZERGPOOL.com - Multialgo, autoexchange, 0.5% fee, 250+ coins

[SergADM]

UPDATE

1. We need to purchase more powerful servers, so enabling 0.5% fee for a week or so

so take 1% per week I think no one will be against
тaк вoзмитe 1% зa нeдeлю я дyмaю никтo пpoтив нe бyдeт

[1713556796]

1713556796

[1713556796]

1713556796

[1713556796]

1713556796

[RivAngE]

If your quality of service is good or it can get better then I'm fine with any fee up to 1%. I just started trying Zergpool so I don't know yet if you're more profitable than other options or not.
My only "complain" so far is that I can't see when did you exchange my mined coins and with what rate.

[alnash]

UPDATE

1. We need to purchase more powerful servers, so enabling 0.5% fee for a week or so

It's not fees that drive people away from your pool. Look at other pools, nearly everyone there has a fee, 0.5-2% is pretty standard.
If you put similar fees and arrange better stability and better service and better features, you'll catch them up.

[arainfall]

Sorry for any inconveniences encountered with any pool issues.

For the more reliable earning estimates, I would recommended to refer to 24h estimated and 24h actual data at the pool. To maximize earnings using any profit switching software you should use current estimate. However it is indeed changing as network difficulties and coin prices do.

You make me laugh. You do realize that you encourage users to use current profitability to make it easier for you to steal more coins ?

The problem is that current profitability statistics are impossible to track, and you think that you are safe, but the real difference is in actual 24h statistics and also more than that in real BTC daily payments.

You use the same pool management software as aHashPool and you claim to have 0% pool fee and you also claim to have 0% exchange fee, and I am 100% sure your EXCHANGE_FEE is at least 10%. Besides that I made tests with identical rigs on the same time and using current statistics on your pool compared to aHashPool and your pool paid 20% less in BTC after day after day of testing.

At least 10% of your income can be lost also because of too weak server, rent one like this one https://www.ovh.ie/dedicated_servers/enterprise/1801mg04.xml    or use more servers because you should have an income of 3 BTC per day because aHashPool pays 6BTC every day for 6000 miners. You have 3000 miners and you only pay only 1,5 BTC per day (2 payments of 0,6 BTC every 12 hours).

Taking this into consideration, because you use the same yiimp pool management software, either you manage your pool very bad, or you steal a part of the income from all your miners and miners have to ask you to pay them on this forum.

So, you write on your homepage that exchange fee is 20% and stop stealing coins.  

You are like a gypsy from Romania that is stealing and misleading everyone, instead of being fair and take care of your server that is offline most of the time.

Fuckin Trolls... You dumb MF's cannot even read a graph. You think it's all plug and play. I'll load up sniffdog and get rich. Mine these shit coins and get me some BTC. Ignorant cocksuckers. Learn how to mine. You have no clue, your just trashing this pool. Get the fuck out and go mine somewhere else. Plenty of places out there... Every fucking day I make better money here than anywhere else... Am I special? Or are you just stupid? In my book your just stupid. You do not know how to mine, you do not understand crypto...Your just stupid... Get the fuck out... Move on... Your to stupid to mine in this pool. Go back to doing her nails... Your way out of your league.

I'm a stupid troll.
But I know zergpool's server had downed many times and attacked and stolen BTC. Is it a really fact or not?
I don't know. Some special people will know it.
Good luck.

[Ruso21]

UPDATE

1. We need to purchase more powerful servers, so enabling 0.5% fee for a week or so

It's not fees that drive people away from your pool. Look at other pools, nearly everyone there has a fee, 0.5-2% is pretty standard.
If you put similar fees and arrange better stability and better service and better features, you'll catch them up.

Agree, but now it's kinda late to do it better as many people have zergpool in the blacklist. So many complains and no reply from admin, he only post things when he wants.

[gak_45]

I think that is indeed a fair complaint. Pinpin has done little to reclaim lost ground... and does not answer legit complaints fast enough (though few are legit and rather most are n00bs being n00bs).

For the past hour or so US stratum has been down. Zip from pinpin. Is it because of a server upgrade? Who knows. This type of thing has to be handled ASAP for zerg to grow... or it will die. I have moved over to blaze until it IS fixed and users are told what happened, why it happened, and how it will not happen again.

[krugerxxx]

I'm new to mining with zergpool and have been reading comments of you..

So what is it really, is it a good pool to use or not?

Sorry new to mining Im finding the most profitable pool that I can use my rig to.

[k2laci]

Who uses it?

ZERGPOOL
ZERGPOOLPLUS
ZERGPOOL24H


Which one is the most profitable?

[asgardcfr]

I use europe.mine.zergpool 

[pinpins]

UPDATE

1. I have been conducing analysis for 24h actual last night. Disovery is that more users have started to use direct mining for many algos.(option 2&3 with mc parameter). Which effectivly mean they mine it outside of pool algo switch procedure, and sometimes mine less profitable coins etc. However yiimp was designed in the way to calculate all blocks found against all hash submitted. I have been able to distinguish Option 1 hash, and now looking into getting right proportion of only appropriate blocks value connected to Option 1 for 24h actual data.  Once I am completed it should provide more accurate 24h actual for coin switch mode(option 1). Current estimate and 24h estimate though is based on Option 1 mining already and should be ok already.

2. Changed DDoS vendor for US server as well as EU. All ports are tested, though, don't hesitate to contact me if some port/algo gives you a problem.

3. Next weekend there will be short 15mins maintenance connected to adding more powerful HW. Will post exact time on web site closer to the date

[krugerxxx]

UPDATE

1. I have been conducing analysis for 24h actual last night. Disovery is that more users have started to use direct mining for many algos.(option 2&3 with mc parameter). Which effectivly mean they mine it outside of pool algo switch procedure, and sometimes mine less profitable coins etc. However yiimp was designed in the way to calculate all blocks found against all hash submitted. I have been able to distinguish Option 1 hash, and now looking into getting right proportion of only appropriate blocks value connected to Option 1 for 24h actual data.  Once I am completed it should provide more accurate 24h actual for coin switch mode(option 1). Current estimate and 24h estimate though is based on Option 1 mining already and should be ok already.

2. Changed DDoS vendor for US server as well as EU. All ports are tested, though, don't hesitate to contact me if some port/algo gives you a problem.

3. Next weekend there will be short 15mins maintenance connected to adding more powerful HW. Will post exact time on web site closer to the date

Hi pinpins, I'm a new user for your pool.

Is it recommended to use multialgo change? Or its better to mine 1 coin which is the most profitable?

And if I do the Option 2 or 3, will those immature coins that I'm not mining anymore will still go to my btc balance?

TIA. I cant read 50+pages so I'm just straight to the point asking

[pinpins]

UPDATE

1. I have been conducing analysis for 24h actual last night. Disovery is that more users have started to use direct mining for many algos.(option 2&3 with mc parameter). Which effectivly mean they mine it outside of pool algo switch procedure, and sometimes mine less profitable coins etc. However yiimp was designed in the way to calculate all blocks found against all hash submitted. I have been able to distinguish Option 1 hash, and now looking into getting right proportion of only appropriate blocks value connected to Option 1 for 24h actual data.  Once I am completed it should provide more accurate 24h actual for coin switch mode(option 1). Current estimate and 24h estimate though is based on Option 1 mining already and should be ok already.

2. Changed DDoS vendor for US server as well as EU. All ports are tested, though, don't hesitate to contact me if some port/algo gives you a problem.

3. Next weekend there will be short 15mins maintenance connected to adding more powerful HW. Will post exact time on web site closer to the date

Hi pinpins, I'm a new user for your pool.

Is it recommended to use multialgo change? Or its better to mine 1 coin which is the most profitable?

And if I do the Option 2 or 3, will those immature coins that I'm not mining anymore will still go to my btc balance?

TIA. I cant read 50+pages so I'm just straight to the point asking

I think it is better to use multi algo switch to hunt for best profits. Though some find Option 3 good, as would like to stick with particular profitable coin. I suggest to try it  differently for 24h.

Yes, immature will convert to balance, it will take some time

[sundownz]

People that actually mine on ZergPool and have also used ZPOOL -- how do they compare ?

I have used ZPOOL quite a bit in the past and still some at present... also Ahashpool and Hashrefinery.

Always went back to ZPOOL out of those three.

Currently most of my power aimed at NiceHash until I decide which multi-pool to hop onto again.

[olegik-ah]

2. Changed DDoS vendor for US server as well as EU. All ports are tested, though, don't hesitate to contact me if some port/algo gives you a problem.

*** ccminer alexis-1.0 for nVidia GPUs from alexis78@github ***
*** Built with VC++ 2013 and nVidia CUDA SDK 7.5 (Recommended)

*** Based on tpruvot@github ccminer
*** Originally based on Christian Buchner and Christian H. project
*** Include some of the work of djm34, sp, tsiv and klausT.

[2018-03-17 21:18:03] Starting on stratum+tcp://Europe.mine.zergpool.com:7433
[2018-03-17 21:18:03] NVAPI GPU monitoring enabled.
[2018-03-17 21:18:03] 1 miner thread started, using 'hsr' algorithm.
[2018-03-17 21:18:24] Stratum connection failed: Failed to connect to Europe.mine.zergpool.com port 7433: Timed out
[2018-03-17 21:18:24] ...retry after 30 seconds
[2018-03-17 21:19:15] Stratum connection failed: Failed to connect to Europe.mine.zergpool.com port 7433: Timed out
[2018-03-17 21:19:15] ...retry after 30 seconds
[2018-03-17 21:20:06] Stratum connection failed: Failed to connect to Europe.mine.zergpool.com port 7433: Timed out
[2018-03-17 21:20:06] ...retry after 30 seconds
[2018-03-17 21:20:58] Stratum connection failed: Failed to connect to Europe.mine.zergpool.com port 7433: Timed out
[2018-03-17 21:20:58] ...retry after 30 seconds
[2018-03-17 21:21:49] Stratum connection failed: Failed to connect to Europe.mine.zergpool.com port 7433: Timed out
[2018-03-17 21:21:49] ...retry after 30 seconds
[2018-03-17 21:22:40] Stratum connection failed: Failed to connect to Europe.mine.zergpool.com port 7433: Timed out
[2018-03-17 21:22:40] ...retry after 30 seconds

Same from tomottow... I have a real static IP 85.93.142.99. Pls, check.
Thanks!

[WhyMe]

Hi,

if i'm right NIHL has changed algo. Can you please close it in neoscrypt ? Thanks

[SergADM]

[2018-03-18 14:10:36] Starting on stratum+tcp://mine.zergpool.com:8533
[2018-03-18 14:10:36] NVML GPU monitoring enabled.
[2018-03-18 14:10:36] NVAPI GPU monitoring enabled.
[2018-03-18 14:10:36] 8 miner threads started, using 'tribus' algorithm.
[2018-03-18 14:10:37] API open in full access mode to 0/0 on port 4068
[2018-03-18 14:10:38] Stratum connection failed: Failed to connect to mine.zergpool.com port 8533: Connection refused
[2018-03-18 14:10:38] ...retry after 30 seconds
[2018-03-18 14:11:11] Stratum connection failed: Failed to connect to mine.zergpool.com port 8533: Connection refused
[2018-03-18 14:11:11] ...retry after 30 seconds
[2018-03-18 14:11:43] Stratum connection failed: Failed to connect to mine.zergpool.com port 8533: Connection refused
[2018-03-18 14:11:43] ...retry after 30 seconds
[2018-03-18 14:12:15] Stratum connection failed: Failed to connect to mine.zergpool.com port 8533: Connection refused
[2018-03-18 14:12:15] ...retry after 30 seconds

[sundownz]

People that actually mine on ZergPool and have also used ZPOOL -- how do they compare ?

I have used ZPOOL quite a bit in the past and still some at present... also Ahashpool and Hashrefinery.

Always went back to ZPOOL out of those three.

Currently most of my power aimed at NiceHash until I decide which multi-pool to hop onto again.

Well I've had 3 machines on for close to a day -- no issues with them so far.

The YescryptR16 seems to be KILLER for CPUs... so maybe I'll push those over first. Looking at ~60% more than Cryptonight on NiceHash based on the stats.

[pinpins]

UPDATE

1. x11 algo stratum will be working on x11.mine.zergpool.com. Will also change to [ALGO].mine.zergpool.com:[PORT] server name format, so you can start adapting slowly. No rush as old URLs will work also for quite some time

[alnash]

API at http://api.zergpool.com:8080/api/currencies doesn't match with what's on the website.
e.g. currently SGL is marked as "no-autotrade", but the API says "noautotrade=0"
also there're problems there with estimates, hashrate, etc. I wonder which figures are correct.

[666abarth666]

why already a few Sundays, you are not giving my money to the purse 194UADtniM913eexVqqSsyyo3P6nkScyqx (sorry for my google translation)