Never invest no product ICOs

[Fugaga]

Mostly on the crypto world today, the product project do have a potential future, if they have a good product, the market will keep demanding and the price keep skyrocket... Therefore, I also like a project with product.

[1713306438]

1713306438

[DesiHunterrrr]

Agree with you since last year dec 2017 I invest in ico programs but never get anything I almost lost $2000 in early months of 2018 now I am doing bounty programs since last six months also found ico going dead day by day peoples fair about the icos now a days to invest good projects also not getting even soft caps reached so good time will come up coming years not now.

[Kripto_adam]

If they have a product we cant buy them with such a low price! Thats how crypto world works.

[vitek146]

Since this year very bad situation in crypto with ICOs what i dont see last few years,many project that dont reach their target to sold their tokens,investors fair give they money for altcoins becouse year statistics not say good, many project lost their prices and nothing news cannot increase again,i think now time belive only for projects with working product or company.

[belingbanged]

Do not easily believe in the emergence of a new ICO. You should always analyze the ICO that you want to follow or the new ICO, many of them who have a purpose just to cheat you. Moreover, in the ICO that does not have a product, it needs to be suspected and watched out. What will you promote if there are no products they create. Expectations will also be thinner to be able to get returns on investment returns.

[Thesaintplague]

Yes, a lot of money was stolen by those companies that went to ICO without their own product. I do not understand why people invest their money in such projects. The probability of success is extremely low. Fondly. It is necessary to choose projects for investment more carefully. Even if you only have $50.

[bellaayu]

What you say is I think correct. Products in an ICO I think this is very important and must be observed. If ICO project without this product need to be questionable because this product is very important and makes people who would be interested in investing.

[parkraol]

It is difficult to trust an ICO with no product. With ICO's volume, others are scams. So even though ICO has few enough to support, the very important it's legit and not thieves and you know the project is meaningful.

[Ubrfeh]

I agree, there are a lot of projects that are ready to send cryptocurrency to the moon or Mars, but the product is worth nothing, so study other information

[brenzosa]

I was a victim many times over when it comes to investing in ico with no products. I was so naive then that i believed that the projects have potentials because they were featured as ads in coinmarketcap, facebook, and other big social media.

Now i learned my lesson from bad experiences and i always do research before i invest.

[ntarah langger]

I agree with you. When a product or working prototype, it gives more confidence in the successful completion of the project. After all, before the ICO to create a prototype, the company worked and found investments, it means that it really works, has experience, knows the weak points of the project and will overcome them.
ICO without product are like a scam

absolutely what you say, I really agree with your opinion.

Note: Currently there are so many ICO fraud projects

[LikaForw]

I think this is not true. Although now many people are noticed in fraudulent activities. This does not mean that there are no worthy companies for investment. Just need to put a lot of strength and desire.

[zina75]

I was wondering, why a lot of projects don't have such an important thing for a successful ICO as a product.

When a company has a product it means they have it to develop. In such case, a company shows why they need ICO and how the company will be growing. What is more, there is more trust because a company has experience in a field they are working.

For example, KickCity company that exists two years. KickCity an event platform that generates revenue and has a Helsinki government grant. KickCity needs ICO to make business bigger and to become a decentralized platform where every user is rewarded for ticket promotion.

On the other hand, no product ICOs can prove their success just in theory. There is no proof base that product will be developed and will be working right.

In such unstable industry as ICO everything has to be under control. The product is one of the things that shows the campaign is not a scam. That is why I believe it is better to invest in ready-made products ICOs.

a good time of the day! I want to say that I completely agree with you, if the company has not only a business plan, but some proof of its activity, it inspires more confidence.

[V0ldemar]

90% of projects do not have a finished product, and this is no reason not to invest in a strong team with a promising idea. This is where they startups, who will develop something new. Without support, there will be no opportunity for development.

[megatrix]

I agree with this, a tangible product, a working prototype would be so much better than just something that is based on pure theory. ICO projects with products are more likely to convince and gain people's trust that their project is real and can provide a better view on its path to success since you already have the working prototype or the product itself. In this industry that is so risky why would you go for something so much riskier if there are project that can provide you more for lesser risks.

[DemonHunter83]

I agree, there are a lot of projects that are ready to send cryptocurrency to the moon or Mars, but the product is worth nothing, so study other information

The product stands, at least when it exists. Many projects simply spread the idea, collect money, transfer the idea to completely different people and go into the sunset with most of the raised funds.

[kramchers]

There are more people who believe in this way, never invest in a no product ICO.
Just remember guys product is different from service.
what if the ICO has a great service to offer like exchange?
this is good to invest right?

[Mr Batman]

yes I agree with you, because in my opinion if we invest in ico that is not a product then our risk of getting a scam is big.

[bascinsto]

I was wondering, why a lot of projects don't have such an important thing for a successful ICO as a product.

When a company has a product it means they have it to develop. In such case, a company shows why they need ICO and how the company will be growing. What is more, there is more trust because a company has experience in a field they are working.

For example, KickCity company that exists two years. KickCity an event platform that generates revenue and has a Helsinki government grant. KickCity needs ICO to make business bigger and to become a decentralized platform where every user is rewarded for ticket promotion.

On the other hand, no product ICOs can prove their success just in theory. There is no proof base that product will be developed and will be working right.

In such unstable industry as ICO everything has to be under control. The product is one of the things that shows the campaign is not a scam. That is why I believe it is better to invest in ready-made products ICOs.

I agree.  If you invest in a company that does not have a product, then there is a very big chance that you will lose all the money.

[ASHLIUSZ]

Agreed, and there were more ico's that has developed their working product only after it reaching a good sum of investment. In recent days the biggest scam that has happened through ico is the fortune ship backed ico by a Korean firm that has raised around $9million, but there is no such ship belonging to the respective firm. It belongs to the Russian government.