Bitcoin Forum
May 02, 2024, 09:20:50 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Why is my 75 Kh/s GPU beating my 1.1Gh/s ASIC miners?  (Read 2881 times)
oddree (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 40
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 22, 2013, 02:29:27 PM
 #1

Hello all, I am pool mining Zetacoin (alt coin, but still SHA256 based) at the moment, but my results have been the same with mining for BTC with BitMinter.  It seems that my video card that mines at 75Kh/s mines WAY MORE efficiently than three ASIC block erupters with a combined hashing power of 1.1Gh/s.  At first I thought that this might be the hardware, or the version of cgminer I was running, etc.  But I have moved these around to different hardware and the result is the same.  I have also gone between cgminer and bfgminer.  No difference.

Here is a screenshot.  Note the speed - and the number of accepted shares.  Am I missing something?  Perhaps I am not reading the stats correctly.  Or is there something I need to tweak to make my erupters mine better?

https://i.imgur.com/KCXXLqP.jpg
1714684850
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714684850

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714684850
Reply with quote  #2

1714684850
Report to moderator
1714684850
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714684850

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714684850
Reply with quote  #2

1714684850
Report to moderator
1714684850
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714684850

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714684850
Reply with quote  #2

1714684850
Report to moderator
The grue lurks in the darkest places of the earth. Its favorite diet is adventurers, but its insatiable appetite is tempered by its fear of light. No grue has ever been seen by the light of day, and few have survived its fearsome jaws to tell the tale.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
lucazane
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1198
Merit: 1000



View Profile WWW
August 22, 2013, 02:49:43 PM
 #2

The shares of the GPU has a lower minimal difficulty : 0.
The shares of your block erupter has a minimal difficulty of 1.

the share submited by your block erupter have more value

The Blocks Factory Mining POOL : DGB(sha256d, Skein, Qubit, Groestl & Scrypt), FTC
rammy2k2
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1974
Merit: 1003



View Profile
August 22, 2013, 02:59:57 PM
 #3

The shares of the GPU has a lower minimal difficulty : 0.
The shares of your block erupter has a minimal difficulty of 1.

the share submited by your block erupter have more value

+1
oddree (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 40
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 22, 2013, 03:07:04 PM
 #4

the share submited by your block erupter have more value

Okay - seems I have some 'learning to do'.  Found this thread useful: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=184552.0

So in essence, when I see a diff of 23/1, that share should be roughly 23 times more valuable than a 1/0?  That is - assuming that the pool is controlling share values in a fair way.
hendo420
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 420
Merit: 250



View Profile WWW
August 22, 2013, 03:08:30 PM
 #5

get the newest cgminer v3.4

Instead of showing total shares it counts the difficulty of the share. So like im mining on middlecoin pool that has a static difficulty of 512, so every share my accepted goes up by 512. This should give you a way better idea of whats more efficient.

ebmarket.co
cp1
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 616
Merit: 500


Stop using branwallets


View Profile
August 22, 2013, 03:33:31 PM
 #6

Your WU is much higher with the ASICs as expected.

Guide to armory offline install on USB key:  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=241730.0
oddree (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 40
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 22, 2013, 05:12:25 PM
 #7

get the newest cgminer v3.4

OKAY!  After a bit of kicking and screaming from my hardware - I am running 3.4 now.  I still don't know what any of these stats mean.  Good time to RTFM.  ;-)

Your WU is much higher with the ASICs as expected.

And what does that mean exactly?  *fumbles through the README*
Each column is as follows:
5s:  A 5 second exponentially decaying average hash rate
avg: An all time average hash rate
A:  The total difficulty of Accepted shares
R:  The total difficulty of Rejected shares
HW:  The number of HardWare errors
WU:  The Work Utility defined as the number of diff1 shares work / minute


Aha!  So, yes.  This makes sense.  And now I can see that while this video card is cracking through Accepted messages like mad - it's still not doing anything notable, as suggested by the WU:0.0/m tally.  I would have to break that down differently before it registered a value!  :-)

Thanks for the help gentlemen!

And here is a screenshot of the same hardware running 3.4, just because.
https://i.imgur.com/v8JkTvg.jpg
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!