Red Trust

[bigmaster23]

actmyname gave me a Red Trust with a reference https://archive.is/lugCY
my fellow bitcoiners could you please look at the reference this guy is giving to me and also look at my previous post see if I'm a shitposter or not after ranking to Full Member this is what I get what a shame. Could you also look at this https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2664813.260 after I post here that what is happen what do you think does this caloy06 report me that I'm a shitposter or this triggered me to actmyname that I'm also a shitposter

[1713535367]

1713535367

[1713535367]

1713535367

[1713535367]

1713535367

[1713535367]

1713535367

[actmyname]

Manipulative person hide in the dark What do you think of the person create bitcoin is BATMAN although with his money He can control every aspect of the business but that doesn't mean their is/are something hide from us maybe the bitcoin is so powerful enough to dominate those altcoin your talking to and in my opinion there might be something that can surpass bitcoin in the future that's what we need to watch out for.

I've recently look at the price of bitcoin 'cause it can affect me in so many ways like last week it drop to 11k$ and it really intrigue me to what if it keeps going I don't know what to do exactly if that happens because I don't want to panic sell or buy BTC without any assurance that it can profit me in the future

These are two of the posts you created recently. I could quote more but it would be redundant. Just because you bump up your word/character count doesn't mean that the post has any substance whatsoever.

It's shitty. It's insubstantial and contributes fuck-all.

[marroxas]

Manipulative person hide in the dark What do you think of the person create bitcoin is BATMAN although with his money He can control every aspect of the business but that doesn't mean their is/are something hide from us maybe the bitcoin is so powerful enough to dominate those altcoin your talking to and in my opinion there might be something that can surpass bitcoin in the future that's what we need to watch out for.

I've recently look at the price of bitcoin 'cause it can affect me in so many ways like last week it drop to 11k$ and it really intrigue me to what if it keeps going I don't know what to do exactly if that happens because I don't want to panic sell or buy BTC without any assurance that it can profit me in the future

These are two of the posts you created recently. I could quote more but it would be redundant. Just because you bump up your word/character count doesn't mean that the post has any substance whatsoever.

It's shitty. It's insubstantial and contributes fuck-all.

Me too he gave me red trust https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1553984.msg27657585#msg27657585
that I'm not doing anything wrong.

[Brunus Januensis]

actmyname gave me a Red Trust with a reference https://archive.is/lugCY
my fellow bitcoiners could you please look at the reference this guy is giving to me and also look at my previous post see if I'm a shitposter or not after ranking to Full Member this is what I get what a shame. Could you also look at this https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2664813.260 after I post here that what is happen what do you think does this caloy06 report me that I'm a shitposter or this triggered me to actmyname that I'm also a shitposter

Well, he took a thread and gave a negative trust to practically everyone: we are all shitposter scammers!

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=465017

Please note that in the rules writes clearly: "- Do not rate people based on the quality of their posts."

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=211858.msg2221664#msg2221664

So, HE broke the rules!!!!!!

Negative rate is for scammers, not for people that you don't like.

What can we do? Now, I'm expecting he will use his godlike power and ban me forever. Clap clap clap

[fanten]

This legendary clearly is sick. He thought that every posts are shitty spamming posts and abusing his trust level to the max.

Define spam.

"irrelevant or unsolicited messages sent over the Internet, typically to a large number of users, for the purposes of advertising, phishing, spreading malware, etc."

Did our posts irrelevant to the topic? Was our posts contain any advertising or phishing or spreading malware? We are doing it for signature campaign and what is so wrong with giving our thought in the topic that is relevant? Even if the posts are shitty, you don't have any right to judge too. But who cares, you are just a busybody that make fun of other people and you are trying to ruin everybody with this. Beware, karma will serve you right.

[Maum]

actmyname gave me a Red Trust with a reference https://archive.is/lugCY
my fellow bitcoiners could you please look at the reference this guy is giving to me and also look at my previous post see if I'm a shitposter or not after ranking to Full Member this is what I get what a shame. Could you also look at this https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2664813.260 after I post here that what is happen what do you think does this caloy06 report me that I'm a shitposter or this triggered me to actmyname that I'm also a shitposter

Well, he took a thread and gave a negative trust to practically everyone: we are all shitposter scammers!

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=465017

Please note that in the rules writes clearly: "- Do not rate people based on the quality of their posts."

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=211858.msg2221664#msg2221664

So, HE broke the rules!!!!!!

Negative rate is for scammers, not for people that you don't like.

What can we do? Now, I'm expecting he will use his godlike power and ban me forever. Clap clap clap

I was not aware of this rule, that feedbacks may not be based on quality of posts, until you pointed it out. Very interesting. That would explain, that some feedbacks seem not to fit to the warning "Warning! Trade with extreme caution!"

[DarkStar_]

This legendary clearly is sick. He thought that every posts are shitty spamming posts and abusing his trust level to the max.

Define spam.

"irrelevant or unsolicited messages sent over the Internet, typically to a large number of users, for the purposes of advertising, phishing, spreading malware, etc."

Did our posts irrelevant to the topic? Was our posts contain any advertising or phishing or spreading malware? We are doing it for signature campaign and what is so wrong with giving our thought in the topic that is relevant? Even if the posts are shitty, you don't have any right to judge too. But who cares, you are just a busybody that make fun of other people and you are trying to ruin everybody with this. Beware, karma will serve you right.

200 pages of discussing whether the price of bitcoin matters is very irrelevant.

Newsgroup and forum
Main article: Newsgroup spam

Newsgroup spam is a type of spam where the targets are Usenet newsgroups. Spamming of Usenet newsgroups actually pre-dates e-mail spam. Usenet convention defines spamming as excessive multiple posting, that is, the repeated posting of a message (or substantially similar messages).

Are you claiming to have read the entire 4000+ posts on that thread, and that you have added something new to the discussion? I'm betting that your ideas have already been mentioned at least 50 times, if not more.


Edit: a word

[malikusama]

If you did something wrong then admit it and try to improve instead of complaining around the forum, it's useless.
They are in DT members list for a reason, don't blame staff for your own mistakes.

[Nomercyforthedirty]

You cannot do anything against the cancer of the forum. You cannot fight DT members like Lauda, aTriz, actmyname and The Pharmacist. These are alt accounts of each other and are the cancer of the forum.

[Notin2]

Hello DT Members @Lauda, aTriz, actmyname and The Pharmacist, am admitting to my mistake, understand that the post was not meant to spam the forum at all, i got carried away in the midst of my excitment thats all

i will delete post if required and promise to only make meaning post only when necessary

No more shittypost whatsoever,

Sorry for my mistake.

[cybersofts]

Something is clearly wrong with this guy.
I got red mark without cheating or scamming anyone here ever.
is that the meaning of the Legendary member is or what - actmyname? or it is just a set-up?

[forgortor]

Last year actmyname gave me a Red Trust
crime : Engaging in account sales.
reference : https://archive.is/Pp2PT

I did not know that it was a mistake
eger apologize for a crime please correct negatigf confidence

[actmyname]

Last year actmyname gave me a Red Trust
crime : Engaging in account sales.
reference : https://archive.is/Pp2PT

I did not know that it was a mistake
eger apologize for a crime please correct negatigf confidence

Ignorance of the law acquits not. I personally equate it to buying trust/reputation since that's pretty much what you're doing by purchasing the account. Especially when it's for signature campaigns and trading.

[forgortor]

Last year actmyname gave me a Red Trust
crime : Engaging in account sales.
reference : https://archive.is/Pp2PT

I did not know that it was a mistake
eger apologize for a crime please correct negatigf confidence

Ignorance of the law acquits not. I personally equate it to buying trust/reputation since that's pretty much what you're doing by purchasing the account. Especially when it's for signature campaigns and trading.

I even said I would apologize if it was illegal to sell accounts
i learned account bitcointalk was not forbidden to sell
please correct your mistake

[actmyname]

I even said I would apologize if it was illegal to sell accounts
i learned account bitcointalk was not forbidden to sell
please correct your mistake

There is no mistake at all. I have given you negative feedback because you were involved in account trades. Since negative trust is subjective, I am free to base it on any reason I choose. If however, I am abusing my position, then I could be removed from DT.

But I have not lied. And there is no mistake to be corrected.