DT Members joining sig campaigns your share me your though about this.

[Scam Exposey]

Username: The Pharmacist
Post Count: 7072
BTC Address:  3C3tVMZ7ciTt7fiMtD3LtDkgAHPs1oCb2f

Thanks for your consideration.

Jumper his moonlight sig campaign does not end yet but he jump to join on big paying camp.

Fuck it. If I'm in, then cool.

Bitcoin Talk Name: actmyname
Bitcoin Talk Profile: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=465017
Rank: Legendary
Post Count (including this post): 2476
BTC Address: 176N1Rz3DhrbBFRxDQEDyienEnDV5MW6fW
ETH Address: 0x8978Da5810Cb38294E36F8729Bd9355030f1BE97

On the other hand what can you say about them joining on sig camp and busting their competitors and gain fame to have slot on every camp they wish to join?

[1713951576]

1713951576

[1713951576]

1713951576

[1713951576]

1713951576

[bill gator]

Jumper his moonlight sig campaign does not end yet but he jump to join on big paying camp.

On the other hand what can you say about them joining on sig camp and busting their competitors and gain fame to have slot on every camp they wish to join?

The Pharmacist is not earning from 2-signature campaigns simultaneously.
They are not breaking any forum guidelines, rules or signature campaign criteria.
What is your point?

There has not been a single instance, as far as I know, of any current DT member tagging someone that applied for the same slot in a signature campaign as them and that person even remotely being considered competition for that slot. Do you have any evidence that these people are "busting their competitors and gain fame to have slot"?

They do not have a monopoly on signature campaigns, or the participants; they literally would not even be relevant to signature campaigns if the signature campaign managers themselves did not grant merit to these ratings. This tells you that the campaign managers probably agree with these ratings, for the most part, and if this is the case you would not be getting into the campaign regardless of their rating; it is just saving campaign managers a few seconds per spammer.

Anyone that puts forth any effort whatsoever into their posts or time around the forum is unaffected by these ratings, unless you consider the positive affect of scaring away spammers or forcing them to improve.

I don't see the problem.

[(Melania)]

Oh my gosh honey! don't you know anything about the first rule of jungle? kill or be killed. they think that they're now the lions of this jungle.
Administrator wants to have moderators to address the spam issue, if you don't want to pay and don't trust them enough to make them staff.

Adding them to DT requires no money and trust. having red trust members would ensure them to come back with new accounts and have more traffic.
Where do you get to have such an smart admin?

[Aventhe]

Oh my gosh honey! don't you know anything about the first rule of jungle? kill or be killed. they think that they're now the lions of this jungle.
Administrator wants to have moderators to address the spam issue, if you don't want to pay and don't trust them enough to make them staff.

Adding them to DT requires no money and trust. having red trust members would ensure them to come back with new accounts and have more traffic.
Where do you get to have such an smart admin?

Please fix your grammar.

Also, I don't quite know how the forum benefits from new members coming in. Remember, it's members. Not traffic. If accounts get negged, they will be left, and new accounts will be created. This does NOT result in a higher traffic density.

Also, if it was all about traffic as you say, why wouldn't the admins make account sales illegal then? Use your brain, don't be a dumbass.

Thirdly, signature campaigns that TP joins are paid weekly or fortnightly. He can leave whenever he wants. The problem persists if he leaves a campaign without announcing it, joins another one (or tries to) and then if he is denied, re-updates his signature to the original campaign.

[shesheboy]

i was thinking a long time ago that the pharmacist and actmyname are both controlled and farmed by the same person.

[Aventhe]

i was thinking a long time ago that the pharmacist and actmyname are both controlled and farmed by the same person.

TP is in America, actmyname is Canadian. Tf?

[shesheboy]

i was thinking a long time ago that the pharmacist and actmyname are both controlled and farmed by the same person.

TP is in America, actmyname is Canadian. Tf?

locations is not accurate and can still be spoofed or faked because account farmers are smart people and they dont use simillar details from their other accounts.

Also, I don't quite know how the forum benefits from new members coming in. Remember, it's members. Not traffic. If accounts get negged, they will be left, and new accounts will be created. This does NOT result in a higher traffic density.

the forum will get more traffic because of new registrants and that simply means more earnings. if accounts get negged they will still be used along with newly created accounts. why?  because some other campaigns especially on altcoins section are less strict and they still allowed accounts with a negative trust.

[Aventhe]

i was thinking a long time ago that the pharmacist and actmyname are both controlled and farmed by the same person.

TP is in America, actmyname is Canadian. Tf?

locations is not accurate and can still be spoofed or faked because account farmers are smart people and they dont use simillar details from their other accounts.

Also, I don't quite know how the forum benefits from new members coming in. Remember, it's members. Not traffic. If accounts get negged, they will be left, and new accounts will be created. This does NOT result in a higher traffic density.

the forum will get more traffic because of new registrants and that simply means more earnings. if accounts get negged they will still be used along with newly created accounts. why?  because some other campaigns especially on altcoins section are less strict and they still allowed accounts with a negative trust.

Still, please explain how admins make money from extra traffic? New participants have nothing to do with the forum finances. It's been publicly said that money is earnt from mainly advertising, not new registrants.

[Bachelorrd]

Still, please explain how admins make money from extra traffic? New participants have nothing to do with the forum finances. It's been publicly said that money is earnt from mainly advertising, not new registrants.

SEO wise these bunch of "Shitposters" are giving you enough traffic to let the forum rank-up on google, yahoo, bing, Alexa or any search engine available right now on the web. That means more and more advertiser will flock to this forum to get their product advertised to reach more potential customer because of the FACT the forum is ranked at the topmost of all other competitors.

(Although I don't totally agree to let loose all the shitposters)

Vod is right "only tag accounts as shitposters if it is obvious to even the brain dead fool"

[KualaBit]

i was thinking a long time ago that the pharmacist and actmyname are both controlled and farmed by the same person.

TP is in America, actmyname is Canadian. Tf?

locations is not accurate and can still be spoofed or faked because account farmers are smart people and they dont use simillar details from their other accounts.

Also, I don't quite know how the forum benefits from new members coming in. Remember, it's members. Not traffic. If accounts get negged, they will be left, and new accounts will be created. This does NOT result in a higher traffic density.

the forum will get more traffic because of new registrants and that simply means more earnings. if accounts get negged they will still be used along with newly created accounts. why?  because some other campaigns especially on altcoins section are less strict and they still allowed accounts with a negative trust.

Still, please explain how admins make money from extra traffic? New participants have nothing to do with the forum finances. It's been publicly said that money is earnt from mainly advertising, not new registrants.

You cannot  increase your price on advertisement if you have a poor traffic...


Anyway back to the topic, I believe it is their rights to join campaign, they are no difference than majority of members here, though they had given the privilege to be in the circle of the default trust.  I never find it being biased because there are lots of campaign out there that is short of people and not that strict as one of the reply here said.  And FYI, bitcoin signature campaign pays way smaller than altcoin campaigns  .  

And tagging people does not benefit them but hate from those account owners.  Who wants to be hated? Anyone?

[Scam Exposey]

i was thinking a long time ago that the pharmacist and actmyname are both controlled and farmed by the same person.

TP is in America, actmyname is Canadian. Tf?

locations is not accurate and can still be spoofed or faked because account farmers are smart people and they dont use simillar details from their other accounts.

Also, I don't quite know how the forum benefits from new members coming in. Remember, it's members. Not traffic. If accounts get negged, they will be left, and new accounts will be created. This does NOT result in a higher traffic density.

the forum will get more traffic because of new registrants and that simply means more earnings. if accounts get negged they will still be used along with newly created accounts. why?  because some other campaigns especially on altcoins section are less strict and they still allowed accounts with a negative trust.

Still, please explain how admins make money from extra traffic? New participants have nothing to do with the forum finances. It's been publicly said that money is earnt from mainly advertising, not new registrants.

If traffic is money you know why? It's because if advertisers could see if the site had a huge traffic then then they may come along to advertise their product and services. And that's why you can see some advertisement header on this furom..

Your a campaign manager why you didn't know that?

[actmyname]

On the other hand what can you say about them joining on sig camp and busting their competitors and gain fame to have slot on every camp they wish to join?

I joined the campaign before I became a DT member. Any post hoc ratings would be pretty useless.

I imagine that the chances of me being accepted to any campaign are more or less the same as before I joined. The people that are being tagged are not really the ones that we're 'competing with'. They're shitposters. And when you have shitposters that participate in only bounty signature campaigns—which I do not participate in, by the way—running amok throwing trash everywhere, you should stop them.

Like I have stated countless times, what would be the difference if we did stop participating? Here's how I assume it'll go down:

1) We leave our signature campaigns.
2) It now becomes assumed that we have alts.
3) Our "alts" are obviously competing with everyone we have tagged
4) Everything remains the same except now instead of the actmyname and The Pharmacist account being accused of this inane conspiracy, it's our "alts"


Here's something: if I did want to abuse my position, I would tag people who are actually in the campaigns I want to join. But whoop-de-doo, how is it that everyone in ChipMixer is still in? It's because there is no conspiracy.

[Kaniel-ouots]

its a normalthing that people use everything for there own profit

[Vod]

I will never join a signature campaign.

1) They are destroying the forum.  I can't tag shitposters who just want the same thing - wearing a signature.  
2) I've shitposted, if I was aggravated or exhausted (or come home from the bar).  I don't always want to explain myself in length, usually yet again.

[Vod]

Still, please explain how admins make money from extra traffic? New participants have nothing to do with the forum finances. It's been publicly said that money is earnt from mainly advertising, not new registrants.

These new participants will be curious about the new ads, and the new sites, and will probably do a lot of clicking.   Admins should set up a PPC price structure. 

[shesheboy]

I will never join a signature campaign.

1) They are destroying the forum.  I can't tag shitposters who just want the same thing - wearing a signature.  
2) I've shitposted, if I was aggravated or exhausted (or come home from the bar).  I don't always want to explain myself in length, usually yet again.

Nice. Thanks for being a good person vod  

[Lauda]

On the other hand what can you say about them joining on sig camp and busting their competitors and gain fame to have slot on every camp they wish to join?

How about the following: I could give him a permanent spot in any of my campaigns. Therefore, he can not be biased as he is never in competition for a spot with anyone?

Oh right OP, you'd still complain because you're a butthurt idiot.

locations is not accurate and can still be spoofed or faked..

Let me just fake my own timezone by posting during the night time and sleeping during the day. Genius.

[The Sceptical Chymist]

OP, you are a fucking troll who will say or do anything to besmirch my reputation in the hopes that I'll stop tagging shitposters like yourself.  I'm not even going to dignify your garbled and irrational attack with any reply, other than to tell you to have fun chasing me around the forum.  Continue the butthurtness if that's what suits you.  You've done exactly zero to help bitcointalk in any way.

[Scam Exposey]

OP, you are a fucking troll who will say or do anything to besmirch my reputation in the hopes that I'll stop tagging shitposters like yourself.  I'm not even going to dignify your garbled and irrational attack with any reply, other than to tell you to have fun chasing me around the forum.  Continue the butthurtness if that's what suits you.  You've done exactly zero to help bitcointalk in any way.

Nope I'm not troll I'm just posting what I see  .

BTW what help did you do on this forum can you name any of those? The way I see you make this forum as your milking cash cow by participatin in sig campaigns and if you really aim to help then take off your sig and show that you're sincere to help the forum. If not then i will just think that tagging those existing accounts is way of eliminating the competitors.

[hilariousetc]

Another pathetic conspiracy dreamed up because the truth isn't exciting enough.

OP, you are a fucking troll who will say or do anything to besmirch my reputation in the hopes that I'll stop tagging shitposters like yourself.  I'm not even going to dignify your garbled and irrational attack with any reply, other than to tell you to have fun chasing me around the forum.  Continue the butthurtness if that's what suits you.  You've done exactly zero to help bitcointalk in any way.

Nope I'm not troll I'm just posting what I see  .

BTW what help did you do on this forum can you name any of those? The way I see you make this forum as your milking cash cow by participatin in sig campaigns and if you really aim to help then take off your sig and show that you're sincere to help the forum. If not then i will just think that tagging those existing accounts is way of eliminating the competitors.

The shitposters that The Pharmacist is tagging would never have a chance in hell of ever getting on a campaign like Chipmixer because their campaign manager actually does their job properly and only accepts quality posters. If all the other crapcoin ICO's and shitmanagers like Sylon did their job people wouldn't have to leave negative feedback because they'd never get on campaigns in the first place. It's because of these campaigns that accept unlimited amounts of shitposters and pay them for any old spam that people feel like they have to take action. Speculating that people are doing this to get rid of competition and free up spaces for themselves is moronic.