Do analysis of mainstream analysts about development and the future of cryptocurrencies serve to make confusion and create suspicion in the reliability and perspective of the cryptocurrencies?
Some analysis given by these analysts are useful and reliable while others are just merely nonsense. Some of them really know cryptocurrencies, they might also be trying and using cryptos that's why they can make their opinions and analysis about it. But also their are analysts who know nothing about crytocurrencies. They only share their opinions for them to show that they are aware and that they know about innovation that is happening to technology, just like using cryptos, but the truth is they don't really know anything about it. They just give their analysis for them to confuse and yes, to give suspicion about cryptocurrencies.