Difficulties and solutions related to merit!!

[prince7059]

I read many threads related to new merit system but i have still some questions.i seen that newbie and jr.members need 0 merits that's very good but memeber rank needs 10 and full member ranks need directly 100 merits.so i think it's caused too much difficulties for acheive this  much merits for all members. isn't it?
So i suggest to reduce the merit number according to rank beacause this is new system for all members and it will take time to use to with it.After simetimes when all members use to with this system you can again increase the merit number.this is only my suggestion.
What do you think about it?you can also give your suggestions.

[1714049782]

1714049782

[1714049782]

1714049782

[1714049782]

1714049782

[1714049782]

1714049782

[Yokonaumiyaki000]

I read many threads related to new merit system but i have still some questions.i seen that newbie and jr.members need 0 merits that's very good but memeber rank needs 10 and full member ranks need directly 100 merits.so i think it's caused too much difficulties for acheive this  much merits for all members. isn't it?
So i suggest to reduce the merit number according to rank beacause this is new system for all members and it will take time to use to with it.After simetimes when all members use to with this system you can again increase the merit number.this is only my suggestion.
What do you think about it?you can also give your suggestions.

Actually obtaining 10 merits is not that hard, there are even high ranks who generously give and provide merits for low ranks given that these low ranks posts quality posts. Here's the thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2830612.msg29015875#msg29015875

But i might agree on the 100 merits thing for members, although i said a while ago that it is not that hard to obtain 10 merits. Yes, the goal is to establish a better forum by encouraging people to post with wuality and be rewarded by merit but isn't 100 too high? I am not against the merit thing but i would love to rank up for me to be rewarded higher in the campaigns. Maybe lower it down to 60-80? If possible?

Anyways, i have a long way to go, and no one said that there would be no future updates on the merit system so anything is possible. In the mean time i just go to post what i have in mind and hope for someone to acknowledge my thought and reward me some merits. Godbless.

[Husires]

it’s only unfair with accounts near to be rank up (59-119-239-259 activity)
hope admin edits this like what he does with more than 755 activity.

[Alex9813]

I read many threads related to new merit system but i have still some questions.i seen that newbie and jr.members need 0 merits that's very good but memeber rank needs 10 and full member ranks need directly 100 merits.so i think it's caused too much difficulties for acheive this  much merits for all members. isn't it?
So i suggest to reduce the merit number according to rank beacause this is new system for all members and it will take time to use to with it.After simetimes when all members use to with this system you can again increase the merit number.this is only my suggestion.
What do you think about it?you can also give your suggestions.

Actually obtaining 10 merits is not that hard, there are even high ranks who generously give and provide merits for low ranks given that these low ranks posts quality posts. Here's the thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2830612.msg29015875#msg29015875

But i might agree on the 100 merits thing for members, although i said a while ago that it is not that hard to obtain 10 merits. Yes, the goal is to establish a better forum by encouraging people to post with wuality and be rewarded by merit but isn't 100 too high? I am not against the merit thing but i would love to rank up for me to be rewarded higher in the campaigns. Maybe lower it down to 60-80? If possible?

Anyways, i have a long way to go, and no one said that there would be no future updates on the merit system so anything is possible. In the mean time i just go to post what i have in mind and hope for someone to acknowledge my thought and reward me some merits. Godbless.

Yes, it's easy to gain 10 merits but hard to gain more 90.So everyone can't jump to Full member easily by passing 3 months.But I like the admin decision because you have to work very hard and soul to be a Full member.You can't easily become Full member by posting bullshit.

So I will suggest you to stop wasting time by talking about it and accept the decision of thymos.

[blue_hurricanger]

I read many threads related to new merit system but i have still some questions.i seen that newbie and jr.members need 0 merits that's very good but memeber rank needs 10 and full member ranks need directly 100 merits.so i think it's caused too much difficulties for acheive this  much merits for all members. isn't it?
So i suggest to reduce the merit number according to rank beacause this is new system for all members and it will take time to use to with it.After simetimes when all members use to with this system you can again increase the merit number.this is only my suggestion.
What do you think about it?you can also give your suggestions.

From 10 merit to 100 merit for rank up from Member to Full Member was too much. Could the scale be more sense by double of what was required for the last rank, example: 10 -> 20 -> 40 -> 80 -> 160 and so go on.

[TMAN]

I read many threads related to new merit system but i have still some questions.i seen that newbie and jr.members need 0 merits that's very good but memeber rank needs 10 and full member ranks need directly 100 merits.so i think it's caused too much difficulties for acheive this  much merits for all members. isn't it?
So i suggest to reduce the merit number according to rank beacause this is new system for all members and it will take time to use to with it.After simetimes when all members use to with this system you can again increase the merit number.this is only my suggestion.
What do you think about it?you can also give your suggestions.

From 10 merit to 100 merit for rank up from Member to Full Member was too much. Could the scale be more sense by double of what was required for the last rank, example: 10 -> 20 -> 40 -> 80 -> 160 and so go on.

Nope..

Imagine being a hero, 100 activity away from the legendary window.. oh fuck need 500 merits as well now..

You are seeing one Hero moan about this for every 100 lower ranked member, reason? Because senior members value quality posts and discussion.