important point

[ballerin and giroud]

government that prohibits bitcoin in some countries. If the government can accept the existence of bitcoin there are some important points in it:
* can pay off the "debt" of the country
* Improve the economy of the people
* Decrease in poverty level
I want to know what you think.

The above three conditions are a natural thing of a state's demand for bitcoin acceptance. The community of bitcoin users will agree with this because basically they also want the country to grow and overcome the problems of the country, especially economic problems. Actually, from the bottom of the heart of the bitcoin users also want to contribute to improve the economy of each country. It's just that they do not want to be victimized and used by the state as a profit because with the acceptance of bitcoin any government will receive profit from each of their transactions when exchanging bitcoin to fiat if the government provides official exchange services managed by the government.

[1713466723]

1713466723

[1713466723]

1713466723

[JimmieA]

government that prohibits bitcoin in some countries. If the government can accept the existence of bitcoin there are some important points in it:
* can pay off the "debt" of the country
* Improve the economy of the people
* Decrease in poverty level
I want to know what you think.

really I do not understand why btc is related to these things. To own btc everyone must use the money to buy, even if the government can not issue btc itself. You think btc will reduce the poverty level but I do not think so, the poor seem to have no impact from this because they  poorly approach to it.

[Hazir]

I would add some other topics also:
 - influence on the state currency
 - using of the bitcoin for criminal purposes in the country

1. BTC can influence on the state currency?

Not really, not at the level, we are now, we would have reached a really significant level of adoption so BTC could threaten the stability of the national currency.
Other than that - the countries where bitcoin was declared illegal are almost always economically unstable.
So when their own currency is unstable to the point of breaking - bitcoin is not even needed to push things there.

[trutel]

government that prohibits bitcoin in some countries. If the government can accept the existence of bitcoin there are some important points in it:
* can pay off the "debt" of the country
* Improve the economy of the people
* Decrease in poverty level
I want to know what you think.

I agree with your opinion, if the government legalize bitcoin may be able to suppress the poverty rate. However, this should be balanced by promoting business and research in the field of internet and information technology. Because if without a strong network, then all will be useless

[Phlaser]

The technology offered is enough to change the current situation of any country. Bitcoin is just too. Let those countries welcome the technology of blockchain and they will understand the importance of Bitcoin.

government that prohibits bitcoin in some countries. If the government can accept the existence of bitcoin there are some important points in it:
* can pay off the "debt" of the country
* Improve the economy of the people
* Decrease in poverty level
I want to know what you think.

[Geemy]

The point that does not end after the 9000 point, which does not exceed more than a few months and I think it does not occur the news is all false and nothing new happens

[dark1234]

The technology offered is enough to change the current situation of any country. Bitcoin is just too. Let those countries welcome the technology of blockchain and they will understand the importance of Bitcoin.

government that prohibits bitcoin in some countries. If the government can accept the existence of bitcoin there are some important points in it:
* can pay off the "debt" of the country
* Improve the economy of the people
* Decrease in poverty level
I want to know what you think.

I hope the government starts trying to manage bitcoin transactions so that their concerns about bitcoin can have an effect on economic stability is a mistake
even bitcoin can help ekopnomi suatau state with the taxation in transactions bitcoin and crypto

[onemoretime8520]

if they accept it there are also many disadvantages of it as the money laundry, escaping from taxes, closing of some financial companies will follow the negative effects of it, so they want to be sure after implementing anything legal about it.

[ronnis.gomes]

Governments are moved by centralization and so fear bitocoin so much. However, the crypto market is growing and more and more gaining fans, so the effort against this trend can become increasingly difficult and innocuous

[tanjilrifat]

I think we are better able to discern the opportunities that exist in every bitcoin and other coin.Actually, from the bottom of the heart of the bitcoin users also want to contribute to improve the economy of each country.

[sungaiyangderas]

if the government can accept the existence of a country's bitcoin economically, maybe bitcoin is basically present to provide an opportunity for us not to be away with the people out there who are financially able to do something from what they have. Together we follow the development of bitcoin, we indirectly get closer to the person financially. Because there is something more valuable that we can get from us to follow this bitcoin.

[hsyncl]

Certainly, this will happen, but as some friends say, countries do not accept it because they do not want to lose control. This is really thought-provoking. Any kind of trade can be legalized.

[bauntyshark]

Bitcoin for sure replace normal paper money in the future and could change the transactions system. The main problems of the financial system will disappear

[Sudarmoon]

Yes it is true with what you are talking about and I also think like that, that by utilizing bitcoin I think it will reduce the poverty level and very much benefit the community.

[fabskie21]

I dont think so. There is no direct relation between prohibition and improvement of a certain country. And we cannot question the decision of some countries to regulate or ban crypto cause our point of views are far beyond the perspective of the leaders our countries which goes on a larger scale.

[rolerVX]

It make a sense because you got the point of some advantages of accepting bitcoin in one particular nation. There are more advantages if we let go bitcoin freely to land in the cou, however there are also disadvantages moreover it should be at the side of more benefits than risk.

[GDragon]

that's only a few benefits that we might get in bitcoin. I highly agree that bitcoin could be a key to achieve poverty reduction. Let's all support bitcoin and achieve success together.

[aso118]

government that prohibits bitcoin in some countries. If the government can accept the existence of bitcoin there are some important points in it:
* can pay off the "debt" of the country
* Improve the economy of the people
* Decrease in poverty level
I want to know what you think.

I agree with your opinion, if the government legalize bitcoin may be able to suppress the poverty rate. However, this should be balanced by promoting business and research in the field of internet and information technology. Because if without a strong network, then all will be useless

I don't see the correlation between poverty and Bitcoin. Sure - if Bitcoin flourishes, there may be an indirect impact on the economy and people could benefit. However, unlike something in the medical or agriculture fields, Bitcoin won't have a direct impact on people on the ground. I don't see how Bitcoin can pay off the debt of a country as well.

[Kakmakr]

government that prohibits bitcoin in some countries. If the government can accept the existence of bitcoin there are some important points in it:
* can pay off the "debt" of the country
* Improve the economy of the people
* Decrease in poverty level
I want to know what you think.

I agree with your opinion, if the government legalize bitcoin may be able to suppress the poverty rate. However, this should be balanced by promoting business and research in the field of internet and information technology. Because if without a strong network, then all will be useless

I don't see the correlation between poverty and Bitcoin. Sure - if Bitcoin flourishes, there may be an indirect impact on the economy and people could benefit. However, unlike something in the medical or agriculture fields, Bitcoin won't have a direct impact on people on the ground. I don't see how Bitcoin can pay off the debt of a country as well.

The direct correlation is that Bitcoin is currently cheaper than traditional remittance companies and a lot of these 3rd world countries have a lot of citizens that are working in 1st world countries and the less fees that are paid, the more money that are send, end up in the receivers pockets.

The normal fees on micro transactions between people are also going to be much cheaper than Banks, so that means more money in the users pockets that use Bitcoin.   

[efxtrader]

government that prohibits bitcoin in some countries. If the government can accept the existence of bitcoin there are some important points in it:
* can pay off the "debt" of the country
* Improve the economy of the people
* Decrease in poverty level
I want to know what you think.

As long many government ban bitcoin, I think bitcoin can not to pay country debt. Its good if government regulate bitcoin because government can earn taxes from bitcoin trade.
Bitcoin can improve peoples economy because bitcoin can use globally and we can make transaction with lower fee.