Do you believe in ICO Ratings?

[kimthien291]

For me ICO Ratings is a good guide that we can check if an ICO is good to invest or not, its still best to make our own research and dig more deeper with the project and team before we invest because no matter how big the ratings are if they want to scam us we can't do anything about it.

[1713974901]

1713974901

[1713974901]

1713974901

[1713974901]

1713974901

[1713974901]

1713974901

[halehale]

 I do not really know that because I did not read icoratings and icobench looking for some ico's because I don't think that they provide ico it will legit and successful so I really appreciated their beliefs to those ico that really matter but I don't really base my expectations to those site.

[casternetwork]

Usually I don't trust such websites with ICO rating, because in most cases they are get paid for this. But there's one recourse icodrops.com which proved to be very reliable. And most of there rating are based on there own investigations. I think this is the best ICO recourse now.

Yes, many ICO rating websites have been paid by project owners for their projects to achieve a high score on the ICO rating website. I think the best way is for every investor to self-study and self-analysis from the perspective of each person

[Olgdanil]

For 100 percent I do not believe in any ratings and not a single review. In any case, every project and its team is studied in detail by myself and if I like the project and the high rating only then I make a decision about investing.

[VelascoMark20]

Ratings are just guides that gives you information, It will depend also to the ICO you're investing in. You may believe and trust ICO rating but you can't blame it if it's not accurate because it's up to you if you will invest your money.

[evok3d]

I do not believe in them at all. The largest ratings have long been selling good reviews for large amounts. And the common people believe them. These are ordinary scammers

[valek.bruno]

No, I categorically do not understand such services, I do not understand why people believe such resources, because all people can buy, each person has a price, whether in money or in something else, but I think that in general such ratings can be only created by machines.

[pelumi20]

The thing is that most of this websites analysis is done by fheir private analyst and some just follow the ratings of other top analyst.
It is advisable to always do your own research because this analyst just share their opinion and they cannot always get everything right.

[thanhly0760]

I do not really know that because I did not read icoratings and icobench looking for some ico's because I don't think that they provide ico it will legit and successful so I really appreciated their beliefs to those ico that really matter but I don't really base my expectations to those site.

[Daydream 61]

Hmmmm !! Some of their ratings is not exactly be done since they are using prediction too but yes I believe in ICO ratings since some of them  are really helpful to us to join or where to join ICOs. I don't consider them completely objective, but I often check the information there to at least approximately remain in the course of events.

[pavelkor]

Why  not? DO we have another way to check them manually? Since there is tons of them, so it helps us a little to choose ICO among them, but, if it based on money, i mean pay and get the high reputation, i dont like it.

[TokenForUs]

do you? unfortunately i never consider for ICO rating as my suggestion to invest, people makes that rating for ICO, probably if you want make perfect rating for your ICO you should talk to ICO rating providers and they can make your ICO seems legit without supported by experienced developers. many examples we can learn for this case, i do not prejudiced all of ICo rating providers, all i want to say is just make your own research on every ICO you want to invest based on your intuition and your own research

[zero4five]

In most cases, the problem of rating web-sites is the questionable quality of the proposed analytics. Now all rating teams have the same difficulties associated with the lack of qualified personnel. Whichever figures the crypto-currency market operates with, we can see high-level analytics only when international rating brands enter this market.

[BlackWidow]

I don't believe much in ico ratings site, it's just one of references, i always do my own research on the project i want to invest in. But i think ico ratings site like ICOBench is good, you can check the summary and KYC project of the token .

[Vova.vova]

If you only recently learned about the existence of ICO, then this post is for you! I want to recommend you a reliable and perspective project, which I use. The project Vireo will make you a good impression and motivate to use ICO constantly! Check it!

[asdlolciterquit]

I've never heard about these site.
i really don't think that right now they can be trustworthy. I don't know, maybe i'm wrong but i prefer to use my judment and what i can know by whitepaper or telegram or even this forum

[giogio0504]

I really believe in rating of some platforms, they are very realistic: icobench.com and icoguide.com

[Sonajin_Coin]

It's a hard call a lot of them seem to just make a lot of assumptions either way and take the whitepaper too seriously and as the truth.  They also do little to verify the qualifications or even if the team and pictures are real (as we know a lot of scammers do hijacks by using real names and faces)  There are some scam coins I invested in that had high ratings and that is when I woke up.

[milah_ah]

I rely on the results of the tracker. Not always. Previously, completely. Now I make a decision, take my attention and my experience. Because the tracker does not always show the truth

[Pasadoble]

I am always checking at www.icoguide.com and rates are very trustworthy.