Do you believe in ICO Ratings?

[veraoktav127]

ico rating provides good information for us as a businessman to determine which ico to choose so I think it will be fine and very helpful

[1714028538]

1714028538

[1714028538]

1714028538

[1714028538]

1714028538

[1714028538]

1714028538

[1714028538]

1714028538

[yomikiyao]

I prefer to believe in the true attitude and identity of team members. For those who have the strength, it is a good choice to follow their footsteps.

[kokota171]

You have to register a profile. No KYC, of course, so you can pretend to be anybody. Then you have to “Apply for Expert” in order to be granted the privilege to assess ICOs.

[boserobot]

I really do not believe ratings. Rating websites take some money for higher rates. Do you own reseach

[chuyenhl13]

Just a bit of documentation to add to the selection

[EL-NIDO]

As a first step of my research I am using ICO rating sites only. But I never trusted them. Perhaps they are manipulated. Better to take some time to read the whitepaper, check their website, twitter, telegram groups and discussions here in bitcointalk forum. We have to analyze the ICO that we will participate. Just trust your own research.

[Skroojee]

It is impossible to determine the ICO project with 100 percent confidence. I think that they are likely to draw a conclusion based on the white sheet and the development team. That's right, but something may go wrong in the future.

[LazyBitInvestor]

I use only one similar web-site: icodrops. If project is located there - it is worth to see it. But you should still study it yourself because there are too many factors and indicators that you need to know before invest.

[Benizzel]

Hi Guys

My bachelor thesis is about Initial Coin Offerings - ICO. In particular, I would like to examine how ICOs and Altcoins are valued by investors.

Link to the Survey: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScDb_lPCnY9tjqa4T2QAFpnG7MfHM7iDHYQxBy1EYQdnppqsA/viewform?usp=sf_link

The survey takes about 10/15 minutes and is anonymous and confidential.

If you have some experience with cryptocurrencies i would like thank you in advance for your participation.

Regards
Beni

[The Goat Master]

I don't believe those ratings. Those can be paid or they can have some other plans about the projects.

[ozgun_a]

I only believe in my own ratings and insight about ICOs. In all financial tools and derivates - one rule is very important.

Do Your Own Research

[BraveSaw]

I'm looking into ICO rating, but we cannot believe them for a 100% since as any other rating, they can be bought by ICO owners

[semar nyengir]

apparently not, because the rating from ico I think only a few predictions of a blockchain that is still not accurate in my opinion and this still needs a better update again for the future. other than that the rating of an ico does not guarantee the altcoin launched by ico is potentially despite its ico success.

[gurupauts]

to analyze whether the ICO can be believed or good is one of them by looking at the rating, if it has a good rating then many believe and will have many investors so that it can be my reference to follow the ICO

[Rtalk]

Ratings can be trusted, but not completely.Ratings show the excitement around the project, team and product. The final decision we have to make ourselves, having studied the project in more detail on a possible Scam.

[makakadu]

I think that there is some truth in them, but this truth is not enough that to trust projects. If there are honest ratings, then this is subjective opinion and experts, if they exist, assess projects on templates, without enthusiasm. Very questionable resources.

[Igorgnome]

I think that there is some truth in them, but this truth is not enough that to trust projects. If there are honest ratings, then this is subjective opinion and experts, if they exist, assess projects on templates, without enthusiasm. Very questionable resources.

I use ICO ratings only as a checklist for finding good ICO's. I start working from top to bottom and analyze each project. It is convenient and ICO which are at the top of the ratings are clearly visible to investors, for this they have an advantage.

[mirawantirinjana]

yes, i believe in some ICO rating, especially for good rating for dev or team of an ICO. with a good rating I am more confident following the bounty on the ICO

[k-west]

I dont believe in a single  word of those fake ratings.All of them are well-paid already by Ico founders and developers.I recommend you to make your own research before investing in Icos.

[panjay]

It's no a rock-solid rule in my case, you see something like savedroid have a good rating before they pulling their marketing gimmick of exit scams, and after that's the rating goes down, luckily save droid only do that's for an ico. Imagine if that's the thing that's you buy do an exit scam.