Do you believe in ICO Ratings?

[BeerTanker]

Some of acceptable internet pages for many of us searching for the decent and  proper new cryptos are ICO Drops and other comparable technical pages.

[1713868142]

1713868142

[samcoin]

I have watched some top rated projects on ICOrating making good return, however they might be wrong sometimes, because in crypto you can't be right in all situations.

[waldocarter]

In the last time, these ratings cause more and more doubts. It is possible to give a lot of examples-projects that had the highest ratings from experts, but in the end failed miserably.

[waldocarter]

In the last time, these ratings cause more and more doubts. It is possible to give a lot of examples-projects that had the highest ratings from experts, but in the end failed miserably.

But they should not be completely trusted either. In this ranking, as many and excellent projects. You can evaluate, study a particular project, and already decide whether to invest in it or not.

[Somthison]

They are probably paid by the ICOs to promoted them as the tops projects out there, instead you should go look for yourself and try to evaluate an ICO depending on what you want, also check their website, social media and team.

[DanilovaSeverina]

You should refer only to themselves and to their knowledge, these ratings can be purchased. I do not advise you to trust these sites.

[londawzen]

People often see that they are actually checking the real ico ratings as one of their referrals which are most selective to investors, but for me ico rating is one is just a guide and I'm not really believe in how quickly they rate some icos. But that would still depend on the willing investors how they would believe in this ICO rating.

[cryptajunkie]

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.

So let's discuss ICO Rating!

No, I don't. Prefer to make own judgements based on my own researching. In order to pick up a worthwhile project, just pay attention to what makes any project being a real project:
 - understandable and reachable idea and/or concept (something, what is gonna be useful/used by you/used by loads of people);
 - solid wp and understandable roadmap;
 - website;
 - presence of MVP;
 - linkedin profiles of team members (they in their turn must be very experienced and competent in the area they're working in);
 - media coverage;
 - active community support, etc.

These are the criteria of a promising and successful project, including one my most favorite - Cryptics. Check it out, it's the example of a trustworthy project

[sne.su]

Of course I do. But you need to take the ratings correctly. For me, ratings are primarily a way of earning their organizers on the sale of seats in the top. and only then the method of informing. Also, by studying the rating tables, you can draw conclusions about the availability of money from certain campaigns.

[karamazovmisha]

Yes, I often look at the ratings. And my choice of project depends on similar ratings. But I also conduct an independent analysis of several projects.

[Tahdayi]

There is no not believe and advise everyone not to believe in this on stilts especially icobench , on this site all selling experts . dokazatelstva have long walk on the Internet

[Rossalex]

I slightly trust them, I look at them and do my ICO analysis, because often ratings are bought. And all decisions must always be made by myself!

[energodar2019]

I used to pay attention to this parameter, but then I realized that I should not trust these ratings. They also take money for advertising from ICO project! You need to check 100 times before you invest!

[maromak]

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.

So let's discuss ICO Rating!

many people check ico rating to be a benchmark of their investment in ico, and to choose which ico is good for investment. but for me, I do not really believe in ico rating because sometimes it does not match facts.

[blozo]

Some websites are good (like crushcrypto) of course not infallible.... Others are more "random" like icobench...

Anyway they are good ways to gather information about ICOs

[hasidz7887876]

I think ICO's rating can only be used for reference. After all, the ICO risk itself is huge. So still rely on their own analysis. If you say that rating agencies have insider. Then you will become a pig.

[quandang821]

I do not believe in rating agencies. This may be my distrust of ICO. I think there is a problem with the fairness of rating agencies. Because they are profitable. So I do not choose ICO.

[tester4206]

now I never rely on the ratings but the team background to lure their good projects and to communicate well in telegram because at first I believe in ICO ratings but when some ICO is a scam even if they are listed on the ICO bench

[sergey_vass]

I think a website like ICObench, ICOrating only as one of the reference factors when we will invest on a project. But we also should not be too trust in these websites. The best result is when we do our own research on the project that we will invest.
So  the ico rating website is just one of our references when we going to do deeper research on a project.

[ZAYANDI]

Yes, I believe in ICO ratings I think this is the best recourse ICO now. In general, ICO ratings are just one part of the browser. I believe in ICO and the fact that you can make a lot of money. But if you want to get invested or work in ICO, you should filter information about them, because this is a fairly easy task, which takes a long time. And the ICO bench because they make comments on what should be an investment risk and what is possible projects affect people so you can choose easily.