Bitcoin Forum
May 10, 2024, 05:51:36 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: eASIC Announces 24 TH/s Fast-Hash Miner, ActiveMining Shares Move 70%  (Read 874 times)
Beta-coiner1 (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 532
Merit: 500


View Profile
September 06, 2013, 04:06:20 PM
 #1

The difficult is going to be insanely high if they manage to get this out.
Quote
The full-blown bitcoin mining arms race continues, as the eASIC/ActiveMining partnership announced more details on their ASIC bitcoin miner line that tops out at 24 TH/s. ActiveMining is a publicly traded bitcoin mining company who has partnered with eASIC to develop a 28nm application specific integrated circuit (ASIC) chip. ActiveMining is the parent company of Virtual Mining Corp (VMC), which is the business entity selling mining products to consumers. To design and manufacture the chips they teamed up with eASIC, a semiconductor company that’s received $124M in funding from well-respected investors

If Butterfly labs were to be considered the Apple of the bitcoin mining world with their clean looking products and concise product lines (eschewing shipping concerns), VMC has gone the opposite route with industrial utility and hundreds of configurable options. They appear to be targeting large scale mining operations both with their choice of design and price point. A detailed table with configurations is provided at the end of this article.

VMC offers three Editions of rack-mountable cases, which can be configured from 1 to 6 modules each. Modules range from 64 GH/s to 256 GH/s, depending upon the edition, and can be purchased with the cases or individually. There is also the option to use expansion cases in place of a module. Expansion cases are priced at $7,500 and can hold up to 16 modules – meaning each base unit can hold house anywhere from 1 to 96 modules if using 6 expansion cases.

Additionally, modules can be run independent of their cases. Modules are PCI-E mounted, meaning they can also be used in a standard computer graphics card slot, and contain a USB port so they can be controlled unplugged from a motherboard as well. ActiveMining has closely guarded the production status of their chip. The more conservative estimate for their first shipment appears to be for November, with an October shipment schedule aggressive but possible. Current orders that are placed forecast a three-month lead time and an early December arrival date.

It has become common practice in the ASIC bitocin mining industry to also offer bulk chip sales and VMC has offered these as well. They will sell their Fast-Hash chips, which run at 16 GH/s, in lots of 500 chips for $75,000. These can not be used immediately, but must be mounted in a printed circuit board (PCB). Avalon and Butterfly Labs have done this in the past and the bitcoin community has created open source designs available to anyone with the ability to manufacture them. It seems likely this will happen again when VMC releases more detailed chip information.
ActiveMining Performance

Active Mining Corporation is based out of Belize and has 25,000,000 outstanding shares. Of those there is a 10,000,000 share float (40%) traded on BTC Trading Corp and BitFunder and 15,000,000 restricted shares held by management. AMC initially planned on operating as a mining-share company after purchasing six Avalon Miners (430 GH/s total), 68 K-16 Boards (307 GH/s total) and 20,000 Avalon chips (5,640 GH/s total) for a combined total of 6,377 GH/s. They have received the six Avalon Batch 3 miners and are paying dividends on mining income, however the later two orders have yet to arrive and refund requests have been filed with Avalon.

Active Mining Corp merged with Virtual Mining Corp, who had a prior relationship with eASIC to manufacture bitcoin mining hardware. Given that the network hash rate has continued to climb over 70% per month, combined with Avalon’s continuous trouble getting chips to customers, selling mining hardware will likely turn out to be more lucrative for shareholders.

ActiveMining issued shares for their combined entity on July 8th for 0.0025 BTC, promising investors that restricted shares would not receive any dividends until their investment was recuperated. Share prices rose steadily through July before reaching an all-time high of 0.009789 on July 29th. Since then shares had declined to 0.004 BTC at the time of the eASIC 24 TH/s miner announcement, before reaching 0.0068 BTC several hours later and quickly retreating.

ActiveMining has officially stepped into the 28nm bitcoin mining market and will compete head to head with KNC, HashFast (a separate company from ActiveMining’s Fast-Hash chip), and CoinTerra. New customers can expect similar delivery estimates across these competitors. KNC and HashFast orders placed now are expected to ship at the end of November, while VMC and CoinTerra’s orders will be shipping in December. All of these companies sold through pre-orders. With the steady 30%+ rise in difficulty every 2016 blocks, delivery schedule will prove as important as chip performance for customers. Time will tell which company has the most reliable supply chain and those that placed their bets properly stand to be rewarded handsomely.


Bitcoin addresses contain a checksum, so it is very unlikely that mistyping an address will cause you to lose money.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
Minor Miner
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2282
Merit: 1012


Be A Digital Miner


View Profile
September 06, 2013, 04:10:10 PM
 #2

I wonder how much capacity they can ship by the "end of November" or how much comes out of each wafer lot they produce.

Dexter770221
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1029
Merit: 1000


View Profile
September 06, 2013, 04:12:37 PM
 #3

24TH/s for 353k$?
Competition is cheaper.

Under development Modular UPGRADEABLE Miner (MUM). Looking for investors.
Changing one PCB with screwdriver and you have brand new miner in hand... Plug&Play, scalable from one module to thousands.
trigeek
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 252
Merit: 250


View Profile WWW
September 06, 2013, 05:02:48 PM
 #4

Yawn.  AMC hasn't shown anything of consequence except some pictures of a bunch of PC power supplies and a workbench they bought at Home Depot for their "assembly line". I really don't think there's too much to worry about here.  And as others have said, they're really just listing off quantity discounts.... which cost more than the competition.  24TH = 60 * 400GH.  They're sold out right now, but the hashfast babyjet was listed at $5600.  That is $336k instead of $353k... $18,000 cheaper.

# HashStrike $ Mining Pools -- Ruby -- Karma -- Mint -- Leaf -- Zeit -- Syn
** Low Fees ** Awesome support ** Super stable **

Ytterbium
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 100



View Profile WWW
September 06, 2013, 05:15:47 PM
 #5

Their product line is way too complicated.  

They should sell modules, cases, and raw chips, and have a bulk order discount for modules. And actually they'd be better off getting rid of the cases and just selling PCIe cards to avoid having to deal with boxbuilding

aerobatic
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 702
Merit: 500


View Profile
September 06, 2013, 05:23:27 PM
 #6

24TH/s for 353k$?
Competition is cheaper.

a quick comparison...

Shipping the same month as Cointerra and a month after Hashfast and 2 months after KnC?   to reach 24 TH/s you'd need 12 of the Cointerra TM IV boxes... and at $14k each thats $168k versus $353k with vmc/amc
  those ct boxes (or hashfash equivalents) would consume about 12 KW and cost $1818 a month to run (plus hvac cooling, which is approx double - i.e.: $3.6k a month in electricity running costs, conservatively - using 15 cents per KwH assumptions).. and the vmc/amc boxes would consume 36 KW, which would cost $5400 per month (and double it with cooling costs so say around $10.8k/month in running costs).  After youve run them both for a year, the vmc/amc wouldve cost an extra $86k to run than the ct, ouch!)

-- Jez
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!