Bitcoin Forum
April 26, 2024, 04:11:03 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: electrum vs bitcoin-qt  (Read 4683 times)
gonzos (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 14
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 25, 2013, 05:25:21 AM
 #1

Hello everyone

I'm still looking to settle with a bitcoins client. I downloaded the Bitcoin-QT client and it took forever to load the blocks, whereas Electrum does not need to download the blocks.
Now I'm puzzled what to use. I can understand, that using the bitcoin-qt client to be more reliable and secure because you download the blocks yourself in opposition to Electrum, where you just depend on a global server downloading the blocks for you and providing them on the client.

Is it a bad thing to use Electrum?

Greetings Gonzos
"I'm sure that in 20 years there will either be very large transaction volume or no volume." -- Satoshi
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714104663
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714104663

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714104663
Reply with quote  #2

1714104663
Report to moderator
favdesu
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764
Merit: 1000



View Profile WWW
September 25, 2013, 05:47:03 AM
 #2

No it's not bad or insecure to use electrum / multibit.

If you want to know how they work, I suggest you to check the alt client sub-forum: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=37.0

karmazynt
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 22
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 25, 2013, 07:15:00 AM
 #3

All of them are pretty the same secure / insecure. Maybe you would use some online wallet like https://blockchain.info/ if you don't want to download full chain?
shakezola
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 14
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 25, 2013, 08:21:11 AM
 #4

What if you connect Electrum to a "fake" server by accident?

Can it alter transactions or do other kinds of harm to your wallet?
gonzos (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 14
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 26, 2013, 05:41:04 AM
 #5

I don't think that would be possible.
you are connecting to publicly hosted servers anyways.
if someone had ill thoughts, they would have used them already.
cp1
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 616
Merit: 500


Stop using branwallets


View Profile
September 26, 2013, 06:54:30 AM
 #6

The only thing a malicious server could do would be to lie to you about how many bitcoins you have.  It can't steal them or anything.  It's a good way to go if you don't want the blockchain hassle.

Guide to armory offline install on USB key:  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=241730.0
dzzima
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 30
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 26, 2013, 08:10:27 AM
 #7

at the end of the day, they are all pretty much the same.  i use bitcoin-qt and happy with it. it takes long time to download the chains, but it happens only once, next time it will take it a couple of seconds or miutes to sync with the network, depending how often you launch it.
reannypleas
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 152
Merit: 100



View Profile
September 26, 2013, 09:01:59 AM
 #8

I using Electrum client and no problems encountered. No need to wait for syncing is Electrum advantage

gonzos (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 14
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 26, 2013, 10:56:27 AM
 #9

good. then i'll have no reason to switch.
Thanks for all your replies. Smiley
Akka
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1232
Merit: 1001



View Profile
September 26, 2013, 11:08:06 AM
 #10

Well, the Network need people running full Nodes (Bitcoin-QT). Without them there is no Bitcoin.

For example, all mobile Wallets rely fully on full Nodes to work.

So, if you have the resources available and want to support the Network I encourage you to use QT.

From a User perspective there speaks nothing against electrum and for systems with low resources (RAM, HD-Space, Bandwith) it is much better.

All previous versions of currency will no longer be supported as of this update
Tammy Chan
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 820
Merit: 1000



View Profile
September 26, 2013, 01:57:47 PM
 #11

Well, the Network need people running full Nodes (Bitcoin-QT). Without them there is no Bitcoin.

For example, all mobile Wallets rely fully on full Nodes to work.

So, if you have the resources available and want to support the Network I encourage you to use QT.

From a User perspective there speaks nothing against electrum and for systems with low resources (RAM, HD-Space, Bandwith) it is much better.

Using Electrum, You cannot make a transaction to multiple addresses.

Apart from that, Electrum is very good and user-friendly.

Endgame
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 412
Merit: 250



View Profile
September 26, 2013, 02:14:12 PM
 #12

Both bitcoin-qt and electrum are safe and secure clients. It's really just a matter of personal preference.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!