Bitcoin Forum
May 05, 2024, 12:57:26 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Ethermine vs Nanopool Mining Pool  (Read 424 times)
oddstake (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 36
Merit: 0


View Profile WWW
January 12, 2018, 10:21:48 AM
 #1

Hi,
Recently Nanopool announced that they increased share difficulty by x2.
I`ve made a comparison with ethermine in a 15m time frame and the result is obvious.
On ethermine the number of shares in 15 min are 75 and on nanopool the number of shares in 16m are 28.
Here are the two print-screens with my results.
Ethermine Print screen and here Nanopool Print Screen
1714870646
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714870646

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714870646
Reply with quote  #2

1714870646
Report to moderator
1714870646
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714870646

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714870646
Reply with quote  #2

1714870646
Report to moderator
1714870646
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714870646

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714870646
Reply with quote  #2

1714870646
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714870646
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714870646

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714870646
Reply with quote  #2

1714870646
Report to moderator
1714870646
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714870646

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714870646
Reply with quote  #2

1714870646
Report to moderator
os2sam
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3578
Merit: 1090


Think for yourself


View Profile
January 12, 2018, 10:26:56 AM
 #2

So what.  Increasing the difficulty of shares the pool accepts decreases the load on the pool and nothing else.

Are these pools Bitcoin pools?  You are in the Bitcoin section so the discussion should be on Bitcoin.

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
oddstake (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 36
Merit: 0


View Profile WWW
January 12, 2018, 10:31:59 AM
 #3

Oh sorry, could a moderator move the topic to ethereum mining ?

Anyway, the number of shares are not still correlating ...
os2sam
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3578
Merit: 1090


Think for yourself


View Profile
January 12, 2018, 10:44:26 AM
 #4

Increased difficulty does increase variance.  Maybe you need a longer sample time.  There may be other differences between the two pools too.

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
P00P135
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 1123
Merit: 136


View Profile
January 12, 2018, 11:43:04 AM
 #5

Hi,
Recently Nanopool announced that they increased share difficulty by x2.
I`ve made a comparison with ethermine in a 15m time frame and the result is obvious.
On ethermine the number of shares in 15 min are 75 and on nanopool the number of shares in 16m are 28.
Here are the two print-screens with my results.
Ethermine Print screen and here Nanopool Print Screen

Ethermine difficulty is way too low for the amount of people on it so you get like 5-20% stale shares because you are submiting work that has already been solved. 
ultiman2
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 67
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 12, 2018, 12:35:18 PM
 #6

Im on dwarfpool and they have lot of bug with the stat so i thinking moving to nanopool or ethermine soon to see if its more stable

any though?
ACKayaturk
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 25
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 15, 2018, 08:09:13 PM
 #7

hi all, is there a difference between eu1 and eu2 pools in nanopool?
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!