overwhelming consensus excludes Lauda, remains in DT2, went in2 buz w sold act

[Lauda]

Smear, misdirect, gaslighting, rinse and repeat. Classy. "Reputable".

I saw somewhere Lauda did the same things (selling accounts) some years ago, am I right?

Nope.

[1713564843]

1713564843

[1713564843]

1713564843

[1713564843]

1713564843

[TMAN]

I believe it is most likely a troll account created to show how obvious the nullis or whatever his name is, account is a sock puppet of someone who is not new here.

You believe?  lol

I know who he is.  And he is not new here. 

I don't entertain accounts who start off being dishonest.   :/

If you think that guy is me, then you are wrong. You have to admit he is funny.

I would suggest you look at nullis who is fraudulently misrepresenting himself being new here and likely faking trades.

Nullius faking trades? I think you are the one who has a drug addiction

[Quickseller]

I believe it is most likely a troll account created to show how obvious the nullis or whatever his name is, account is a sock puppet of someone who is not new here.

You believe?  lol

I know who he is.  And he is not new here. 

I don't entertain accounts who start off being dishonest.   :/

If you think that guy is me, then you are wrong. You have to admit he is funny.

I would suggest you look at nullis who is fraudulently misrepresenting himself being new here and likely faking trades.

It's fun how Lauda likes to accuse you of scamming and selling accounts. I saw somewhere Lauda did the same things (selling accounts) some years ago, am I right?

Well i am have proof that lauda tried to buy accounts, including attempting to buy up 10 at a time on at least one occasion. It would probably be a safe assumption that he also sold accounts.

[Quickseller]

I believe it is most likely a troll account created to show how obvious the nullis or whatever his name is, account is a sock puppet of someone who is not new here.

You believe?  lol

I know who he is.  And he is not new here. 

I don't entertain accounts who start off being dishonest.   :/

If you think that guy is me, then you are wrong. You have to admit he is funny.

I would suggest you look at nullis who is fraudulently misrepresenting himself being new here and likely faking trades.

Nullius faking trades? I think you are the one who has a drug addiction

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2954287.0

I’ll let that speak for itself.

[Vod]

If you think that guy is me, then you are wrong. You have to admit he is funny.

Do I have to actually post I have him on ignore?

It seems if I don't, you'll start a thread like "Vod admits New Account is funny! - *not disputed by vod*"

I explicitly deny/dispute anything anyone may post about me.  

[TMAN]

I believe it is most likely a troll account created to show how obvious the nullis or whatever his name is, account is a sock puppet of someone who is not new here.

You believe?  lol

I know who he is.  And he is not new here.  

I don't entertain accounts who start off being dishonest.   :/

If you think that guy is me, then you are wrong. You have to admit he is funny.

I would suggest you look at nullis who is fraudulently misrepresenting himself being new here and likely faking trades.

Nullius faking trades? I think you are the one who has a drug addiction

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2954287.0

I’ll let that speak for itself.

I see nothing wrong with that, but I am not like you, scumbags like you judge people by your own standards.. that's why I am so surprised about your relationship with OG.. normally a blagger can't blag another blagger

[Quickseller]

If you think that guy is me, then you are wrong. You have to admit he is funny.

Do I have to explicitly post I have him on ignore?

It seems if I don't, you'll start a thread like "Vod admits New Account is funny! - *not disputed by vod*"

I explicitly deny/dispute anything anyone may post about me. 

Oh, I didn’t pick up on that.

You should un-ignore him. You might get a laugh out of what he says. I sure did.

[Vod]

You should un-ignore him. You might get a laugh out of what he says. I sure did.

You know my stance on that - if he meant what he posted, he would use his main account.  I don't believe Anonymous Cowards.

[o_e_l_e_o]

I explicitly deny/dispute anything anyone may post about me.  

Vod is an all round good guy.

I'm actually new here and you all scare me.

[suchmoon]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2954287.0

I’ll let that speak for itself.

[Zepher]

After considering things, I honestly couldn't care less about being excluded from DT. I no longer wish to be part of this flawed system, a system that worked for a long time, but is  now infiltrated by scammers and people who use it to benefit their own personal agendas.

The only thing that truly pisses me off is the fact that all of my ratings are now defunct. I may not have been completely active recently, but the users who know me understand I have had my reasons for that. I would say that the majority of all the ratings I have ever left are completely valid. The trustworthy users I have given positive trust to, for often very large deals, means nothing now.
All the untrustworthy users I have tagged over the years, to warn other users to avoid that person - means nothing now.

It ALL means nothing. Congrats.

[Lipe490]

After considering things, I honestly couldn't care less about being excluded from DT. I no longer wish to be part of this flawed system, a system that worked for a long time, but is  now infiltrated by scammers and people who use it to benefit their own personal agendas.

The only thing that truly pisses me off is the fact that all of my ratings are now defunct. I may not have been completely active recently, but the users who know me understand I have had my reasons for that. I would say that the majority of all the ratings I have ever left are completely valid. The trustworthy users I have given positive trust to, for often very large deals, means nothing now.
All the untrustworthy users I have tagged over the years, to warn other users to avoid that person - means nothing now.

It ALL means nothing. Congrats.

I disagree. I think it means too much. You helped to expose scammers. But the question is, did you do that because you wanted to keep the forum cleaner? If that is the reason then you shouldn't care if the tag are not showing in their profile tab.

[Lauda]

If that is the reason then you shouldn't care if the tag are not showing in their profile tab.

Intelligent, you do not seem to be. It is exactly the opposite.

[Lipe490]

If that is the reason then you shouldn't care if the tag are not showing in their profile tab.

Intelligent, you do not seem to be. It is exactly the opposite.

lol. Aren't you going to call me a dumbass or a fucking moron? Where is all your good manners? I think it's time to take your pills, because you said I do not seem to be intelligent instead calling me names like you usually do with everyone else.

[Zepher]

After considering things, I honestly couldn't care less about being excluded from DT. I no longer wish to be part of this flawed system, a system that worked for a long time, but is  now infiltrated by scammers and people who use it to benefit their own personal agendas.

The only thing that truly pisses me off is the fact that all of my ratings are now defunct. I may not have been completely active recently, but the users who know me understand I have had my reasons for that. I would say that the majority of all the ratings I have ever left are completely valid. The trustworthy users I have given positive trust to, for often very large deals, means nothing now.
All the untrustworthy users I have tagged over the years, to warn other users to avoid that person - means nothing now.

It ALL means nothing. Congrats.

I disagree. I think it means too much. You helped to expose scammers. But the question is, did you do that because you wanted to keep the forum cleaner? If that is the reason then you shouldn't care if the tag are not showing in their profile tab.

Yes, I tried to do my part in contributing to the "cleanliness" of the forum. I have never been anywhere near as active as someone like Lauda, but I would like to think i have helped in some way.

Anyway, your argument is flawed.

The majority of users have their trust settings at depth 2, and so although my ratings are still there, they are now untrusted - which is hidden by default. So it means nothing

[Lipe490]

After considering things, I honestly couldn't care less about being excluded from DT. I no longer wish to be part of this flawed system, a system that worked for a long time, but is  now infiltrated by scammers and people who use it to benefit their own personal agendas.

The only thing that truly pisses me off is the fact that all of my ratings are now defunct. I may not have been completely active recently, but the users who know me understand I have had my reasons for that. I would say that the majority of all the ratings I have ever left are completely valid. The trustworthy users I have given positive trust to, for often very large deals, means nothing now.
All the untrustworthy users I have tagged over the years, to warn other users to avoid that person - means nothing now.

It ALL means nothing. Congrats.

I disagree. I think it means too much. You helped to expose scammers. But the question is, did you do that because you wanted to keep the forum cleaner? If that is the reason then you shouldn't care if the tag are not showing in their profile tab.

Yes, I tried to do my part in contributing to the "cleanliness" of the forum. I have never been anywhere near as active as someone like Lauda, but I would like to think i have helped in some way.

Anyway, your argument is flawed.

The majority of users have their trust settings at depth 2, and so although my ratings are still there, they are now untrusted - which is hidden by default. So it means nothing

Well, I understand. But why did you get excluded from DT list?

[suchmoon]

After considering things, I honestly couldn't care less about being excluded from DT. I no longer wish to be part of this flawed system, a system that worked for a long time, but is  now infiltrated by scammers and people who use it to benefit their own personal agendas.

The only thing that truly pisses me off is the fact that all of my ratings are now defunct. I may not have been completely active recently, but the users who know me understand I have had my reasons for that. I would say that the majority of all the ratings I have ever left are completely valid. The trustworthy users I have given positive trust to, for often very large deals, means nothing now.
All the untrustworthy users I have tagged over the years, to warn other users to avoid that person - means nothing now.

It ALL means nothing. Congrats.

What a clusterfuck. I'll review your ratings over the weekend and if I'm still in DT by then - I'll try to repost as many as I can.

[Lauda]

But why did you get excluded from DT list?

1 word: Abuse. The rest is trivial semantics.

What a clusterfuck. I'll review your ratings over the weekend and if I'm still in DT by then - I'll try to repost as many as I can.

Just make sure you don't leave any positive ratings to TMAN, or it is going to be very likely that you will no longer be in DT.

[tmfp]

Absolutely going to go nowhere near the knitting circle politics of this "situation", but the disappearing of all trust previously left by an ousted member of Default Trust seems to be pretty daft.
Presumably they were trustworthy and valued at some point in time, before the wind changed?
Surely, as "Nights of the Cross Thru's" like this are relatively rare, previously left positives and negatives should stand, unless challenged and then arbitrated on.

[Lauda]

Presumably they were trustworthy and valued at some point in time, before the wind changed?

OP is an account trader and farmer. Ergo, why he started this thread and all threads ever about me (or similar). From his perspective, it is in his best interest that all those ratings get nullified.