overwhelming consensus excludes Lauda, remains in DT2, went in2 buz w sold act

[suchmoon]

nullius is lauda. That is very clear. Anyone who does not see this is simply closing their eyes.

Given the advanced cryptography knowledge (among other things) shown by nullius, I take this as a compliment. I assume that you have proof for this accusation?  

Did you have a cat named Alia and did you grow up on Armelle street? I'm sure this is the missing link.

[1713510513]

1713510513

[1713510513]

1713510513

[1713510513]

1713510513

[InvoKing]

If Nullius is Lauda, and Lauda is ThePharmacist, and OgNasty is Quickseller, and Quickseller is TomatoCage, am I still me? Who's writing this comment?

If
Nullius = Lauda
Lauda = ThePharmacist
then
Nullius = ThePharmacist

and
OgNasty = Quickseller
Quickseller = TomatoCage
then
OgNasty = TomatoCage

and
Lauda = Lady
ThePharmacist = Man
OgNasty = Man
Quickseller = ??
TomatoCage = ??
Nullius = ??

then
Thread = Piece of shit

Please close it.
Thank you

We have a winner! +1
Close it, thanks.
do not hate meh, i am neutral and I missed dat pic,
http://m.quickmeme.com/img/5e/5eb6774c2ead0493e17fe4b2b9cc238043aa3c95ab77435a7301810006ee28f9.jpg

[SM23031997]

do not hate meh, i am neutral and I missed dat pic,
http://m.quickmeme.com/img/5e/5eb6774c2ead0493e17fe4b2b9cc238043aa3c95ab77435a7301810006ee28f9.jpg

I like that "together forever", Yeah!!  +1

[nullius]

nullius is lauda. That is very clear. Anyone who does not see this is simply closing their eyes.

Given the advanced cryptography knowledge (among other things) shown by nullius, I take this as a compliment. I assume that you have proof for this accusation?  

Did you have a cat named Alia and did you grow up on Armelle street? I'm sure this is the missing link.

suchmoon, you scooped me—and you did it with /such /signature /style!

Well, that should answer this:

Lauda = Lady
ThePharmacist = Man
OgNasty = Man Overgrown Boy [FTFY — nullius]
Quickseller = ?? [Fully accurate descriptor. — nullius]
TomatoCage = ??
Nullius = ?? Man

Anyway...

nullius is lauda. That is very clear. Anyone who does not see this is simply closing their eyes.

Given the advanced cryptography knowledge (among other things) shown by nullius, I take this as a compliment. I assume that you have proof for this accusation?  

The compliment is mine, Lauda.  Getting accused of being you seems to be a mark of forum greatness which I can’t quite believe I’ve come to merit just from my activities of the past few weeks (!).  More to the point:  I admire and still envy the status you’ve earned through your years of contributions to the forum.  Well, I suppose I ought work harder; and meanwhile, I can console myself with Alia-related matters.

Now, it is difficult to decide what I find most amusing:

• The allegation that I am Satoshi (which I have admitted—with sarcasm; thanks for your sarcasm-shilling, suchmoon!).
• The allegation that I am Lauda.
• The irony that IRL, I am allergic to cats (sorry, Lauda!).
• The fact that as soon as I show up in an Quickseller anti-Lauda thread which was growing at a rate of 15 pages/day, it dies down to a few jokes between people who think that Lauda is the cat’s meow—save for the rare, tentative post by Quickseller or some troll sock, which everybody then laughs at.
• The fact that wannabe tough-guy Mr. Nasty doesn’t dare say boo to me, or even toss at me some stupid graphic-in-lieu-of-an-argument.  I’ve observed that he puts on his mad-dog tough-guy act whenever anyone voices even the smallest criticism of him.  Now, I’ve spent about a full day repeatedly amusing myself by mocking his manhood (or lack thereof).  And he slinks away as a whipped cur!  Typical bully attitude:  Cowardice covered by bluster.

Cheers.

[suchmoon]

suchmoon, you scooped me

I think I don't want to know what "scooped" means in this context, but I did adjust Alia's merits to 69.

[nullius]

suchmoon, you scooped me

I think I don't want to know what "scooped" means in this context, but I did adjust Alia's merits to 69.

I noticed!  And I’m not the only one.  Your touch of style even got screenshotted for posterity [NSFW thread]:

I couldn't resist to screenshot your perfect Merit score to go with your service:

P.S., relax—“scooped” in this context means that I was about to—oh no, that red thing you are paid to shill for in your signature will now haunt me forever!

[OgNasty]

nullius is lauda. That is very clear. Anyone who does not see this is simply closing their eyes.

Given the advanced cryptography knowledge (among other things) shown by nullius, I take this as a compliment. I assume that you have proof for this accusation?  

Did you have a cat named Alia and did you grow up on Armelle street? I'm sure this is the missing link.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2837197.msg29420977#msg29420977 

[SM23031997]

nullius is lauda. That is very clear. Anyone who does not see this is simply closing their eyes.

Given the advanced cryptography knowledge (among other things) shown by nullius, I take this as a compliment. I assume that you have proof for this accusation?  

Did you have a cat named Alia and did you grow up on Armelle street? I'm sure this is the missing link.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2837197.msg29420977#msg29420977 

I sent him 2 Merit points for that review and later realized that I can't reply because thread is locked. I want say thanks for saving me, I liked his review and won't order service from OP. 

[suchmoon]

nullius is lauda. That is very clear. Anyone who does not see this is simply closing their eyes.

Given the advanced cryptography knowledge (among other things) shown by nullius, I take this as a compliment. I assume that you have proof for this accusation?  

Did you have a cat named Alia and did you grow up on Armelle street? I'm sure this is the missing link.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2837197.msg29420977#msg29420977 

Sounds like QS is Alia's boyfriend. The plot thickens.

[nullius]

nullius is lauda. That is very clear. Anyone who does not see this is simply closing their eyes.

Given the advanced cryptography knowledge (among other things) shown by nullius, I take this as a compliment. I assume that you have proof for this accusation? 

Did you have a cat named Alia and did you grow up on Armelle street? I'm sure this is the missing link.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2837197.msg29420977#msg29420977 

Well, proves my point even worse than I expected:  Mr. Nasty will go pick on a woman, because he’s too much of a snivelling poltroon to take a shot at me.  Disgusting.

This is the level of impotent prick who gets the tar beaten out of him by a strip club bouncer after trying to stiff one of the ladies—for either plausible definition of the word “stiff”.

Given that sort of character, it’s no wonder that women must dislike him so much that he feels an urgent need to go around posturing with the stink of desperation to pretend he’s a Real Man.  Protip:  Real Men never do that—except when they’re mocking and quasi-satirizing a wannabe such as Mr. Nasty.

For those who don’t know who Alia is, she’s a 19-year-old camgirl (/u/GirlsGoneBitcoin verified by theymos) who so happens to like me.  (Or per my trust page...)  My first-ever contact with her occured just yesterday, in public.  She has no direct involvement in this matter.  For Mr. Nasty to take a shot at her in lieu of me is the single most contemptible thing I’ve seen today in a thread which is a creepy horror-show of contemptible things.  Though I’d still call him Quickseller’s soul-brother, I’m no longer sure which of them is worse.

[poGium]

nullius is lauda. That is very clear. Anyone who does not see this is simply closing their eyes.

Given the advanced cryptography knowledge (among other things) shown by nullius, I take this as a compliment. I assume that you have proof for this accusation?  

Did you have a cat named Alia and did you grow up on Armelle street? I'm sure this is the missing link.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2837197.msg29420977#msg29420977  

I sent him 2 Merit points for that review and later realized that I can't reply because thread is locked. I want say thanks for saving me, I liked his review and won't order service from OP.  

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2965868.0

Here is her new thread. About every week she opens a new thread. Either she wants to sell something (herself (no reproach!)) or she wants to buy drugs, or she wants to borrow money (in my opinion, for the strangest reasons  ) and so on. Honestly she seems very suspicious to me.

[Tokek_Belang]

write ratings and more). However, before spending your time, you should make sure that you do not suddenly get rid of yourself for an unauthorized reason-altogether, otherwise your efforts will be in vain.Roll Eyes
I would not even recommend that you go through that list unless they make changes to DT1, which is also unlikely.

One of the problems with eliminating so many people is forcing them to create new accounts, with knowledge of what to avoid in the future to avoid another.
What if the negs by DT members are not visible to the user itself, but only to other login members? There are obviously some drawbacks to this idea, but I believe this can slow down the pace of created and discarded accounts.

[Quickseller]

Very interesting and relevant quote in another thread in reputation:

[...]
I have been silent on this for too long.  I also have problems with this syndicate of trust abusers.  It's been going on for too long now.  They use shills and sock puppets to discredit their competitors reputations while boosting the reputation of their own syndicate.  In today's BTC value, I have lost over $70,000 to scammers through campaigns this group has managed, yet my reputation has been painted red while their reputations continue to move up in status.  It's absurd!  I have been resigned to take my losses, but they are becoming significant enough now for me to consider judicial remedies of retrieval....This has to stop!

I have no evidence of you personally scamming anybody....However, there is plenty of circumstantial evidence regarding the issue of "trust abuse" surrounding the reputation network that supports your position.  I am not here to accuse anybody ---> I am simply pointing out that the trust abuse needs to stop ---> My comment was a just a response to Yahoo's comment for which he may have some personal insight.  My main complaint is that there have been plenty of highly questionable events that have received no reputation demerits, while at the same time there has been a practice of ruining other user's reputations for extremely minor nuances.  The big question is thus: why does a small group of associated members, many of which have been involved in seriously negative events, have green trust, while a much larger base of members, whom have not been involved in any scams whatsoever, have red trust?  Isn't there something wrong with that correlation?

[...]

[suchmoon]

Very interesting and relevant quote in another thread in reputation:

Good job, have a cookie. Copy this to as many Lauda threads as you can. This is definitely making you look a lot less butthurt.

[TMAN]

Very interesting and relevant quote in another thread in reputation:

Good job, have a cookie. Copy this to as many Lauda threads as you can. This is definitely making you look a lot less butthurt.

I like you suchmoon..  QS really should take up golf or work hour how to utilise his micropeen

[ibminer]

I have posted with exactly two accounts in this thread, the other account was really just screwing around, and I don't think was backing my arguments.

On that topic, I am fairly confident that lauda has used sockpuppets in this very thread to back his arguments. I believe one of these to be The Pharmacist, however lauda has not responded to this accusation yet, so I do not want to make the evidence I have of this public. In the US court system, the accused will first either plead guilty or not guilty before they are tried, and get to see evidence against them, and I do not see any other reason why I would be obligated to allow him to see evidence against him before he makes his position on this clear. This does not rely upon any confidential sources, so I can share what I have provided confidentiality is promised.

Most people require proof before accepting anything... again, why does Lauda have to deny something for you to give the evidence?... and why can't Lauda just deny it?  round and round we go  I'd love to see the evidence and certainly would provide confidentiality. Keep in mind, I seek truth.

This is actually quite appropriate defense when said "criticism" is of the following type:

All of those accounts deserved their negative trust. Creating a new account to spread the lie that I'm a pedophile is not criticism.

If you actually intent to spend time properly addressing any concern-trolling-aka-smear-attempt, then they are easily going to drain your energy[1]. Either you are out, or you are drained to the point where you are barely able to do anything. Either way, the other side wins.
[1] This is a classic tactic from the book of fraudsters, very often used by Bcash scammers to smear Core developers with whatever (the same has happened in this thread, just directed at me). I expect you to know this, but I've stated it anyways.

I get all of that. I'm not saying you have to defend yourself to every account that comes along, I'm just looking at it from the perception of other members that may not know anything about QS's history who may just see you as dodging or side-stepping the claims. In your situation, I almost see it as better to not respond at all unless valid evidence were presented upfront.

...it is actually a little exciting to see DT1 members using their rights and being active in the trust area..

Excluding me based on my statements on the Bcash scam and tags on bcash scammers (which I asked theymos about before actually neg. rating several people), is indeed a *exciting use of their right*.

I did say a little exciting. You have pushed boundaries I don't think I've seen pushed before, in relation to what is acceptable and unacceptable use of the trust system, so the conflict is not surprising to me, just good to see the activity I guess... I neither confirm nor deny whether I agree with said activities.  

--snip--

Thanks for the explanation. Initially the statement seemed to offer scammers a false sense of acceptance, but I believe I at least understand your point of view now. There are certainly different levels of scammers, and I do occasionally miss dank   ... but I don't think I'd have any reason or desire to trade with him, then or now ... to each his own I guess.  

[Lauda]

Very interesting and relevant quote in another thread in reputation:
...

That's not even related to me. The guy is butthurt that actmyname tagged him.

...and why can't Lauda just deny it? ...

When there is no evidence, why would I? To please the very sick obsession that OP has with me? My explicit denial of anything is not enough for OP anyways, thus it's pointless unless there is evidence for any accusation (in that case, I'd need to regardless who brought the tampered evidence up).

I get all of that. I'm not saying you have to defend yourself to every account that comes along, I'm just looking at it from the perception of other members that may not know anything about QS's history who may just see you as dodging or side-stepping the claims. In your situation, I almost see it as better to not respond at all unless valid evidence were presented upfront.

True. However, when the busted baboons jump on the bandwagon along with OP's shills, then it might seem *unusually convincing* for the reader who doesn't know him and/or the others. Classic smear tactic. Spread a bad rumor here, spread another bad rumor there and hope something spreads into the likes of "a friend of a friend of a friend reliable unidentified source" told me Lauda does [insertWhateverLie]. But hey, all is good after all:

"continues to help the community"... by selling DT accounts to known scammers.

I did say a little exciting. You have pushed boundaries I don't think I've seen pushed before, in relation to what is acceptable and unacceptable use of the trust system, so the conflict is not surprising to me, just good to see the activity I guess... I neither confirm nor deny whether I agree with said activities.  

That may very well be, but that's still not close to where we need to be (with various policies; also non trust system related) if this place is to *work decently* again. However, with very little input from theymos and no input from almost any DT1 member there's only so much that can be done.

[Deena]

Most people require proof before accepting anything...

Come on. All that red paint isn't about proof. In many cases there's proof of innocence and nothing is restored. In many cases there's proof of guilt and nothing is done. The red paint is about eleminating competition. About greed at the expense of honesty.

[criptix]

I dont know why but i really read through all 22 pages rofl


Good job boys and girls  

Popcorn stocks raised by 15% because of this thread   

[Blazed]

I am always so insulted that I am never accused of having an alt account. Can someone please accuse me of that...thanks!

Blazed = ?

? is an alt of Blazed etc...