|
JimiQ84
|
 |
September 17, 2013, 04:50:51 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"I'm sure that in 20 years there will either be very large transaction volume or no volume." -- Satoshi
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ZetaOS
|
|
September 17, 2013, 04:54:44 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Kluge
Donator
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1015
|
|
September 17, 2013, 04:55:10 PM |
|
Why do we talk about 6 confs for a double-spend? Maybe for Gox. There are plenty of places which'd accept 2 or 3 confs as "reliable confirmation." Ele could already pull off the 33% attack.
(not that I care, except out of curiosity, and I enjoy reading the new ways Ele plans to cripple service to intentionally lose hashrate share if it breaches certain thresholds)
|
|
|
|
|
neutralist
Member
Offline
Activity: 85
Merit: 10
|
|
September 18, 2013, 09:44:08 PM |
|
shouldn't need to limit the hash rate artificially. Let the arms race run its course.
|
|
|
|
|
|
mechs
|
|
September 18, 2013, 09:51:09 PM |
|
The hashrate should spread more. Slush, 50BTC, Eligius, EclipseMC, Bitminter are all good and responsible pools
Or use a real decentralized solution like P2Pool. Even if 100% would mine there, the network would be perfectly decentralized. Really, it saddens me, that despite claiming different, most miners seem to not care about the Network and can't even live with a bit of variance. Bitcoin is still in its infancy and miners need to take responsibility to help keep the server secure by spreading out the hashrate. |
|
|
|
|
|
VeeMiner (OP)
|
|
September 19, 2013, 08:47:55 AM |
|
The hashrate should spread more. Slush, 50BTC, Eligius, EclipseMC, Bitminter are all good and responsible pools
Or use a real decentralized solution like P2Pool. Even if 100% would mine there, the network would be perfectly decentralized. Really, it saddens me, that despite claiming different, most miners seem to not care about the Network and can't even live with a bit of variance. Bitcoin is still in its infancy and miners need to take responsibility to help keep the server secure by spreading out the hashrate. +1 exactly |
|
|
|
|
|
birkomester
|
|
November 19, 2013, 06:37:03 PM |
|
I mine at deepbit
|
|
|
|
|
|
mootinator
|
|
November 19, 2013, 06:54:02 PM |
|
I mine at deepbit
That was definitely worth resurrecting this thread for. Welcome to bitcointalk! |
No
|
|
|
|
cowandtea
|
|
November 20, 2013, 08:34:04 AM |
|
Nah, BTCguild is the best place to mine...  |
|
|
|
Magicmike514
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 15
Merit: 0
|
|
November 20, 2013, 08:50:48 AM |
|
FUD
There are reasons why people with solo-mining capabilities are using BTCGuild. Simple interface, easy to setup.
What is the benefit of mining with BTCGuild over let's say Elgius? |
|
|
|
|
|
mootinator
|
|
November 20, 2013, 07:47:18 PM |
|
FUD
There are reasons why people with solo-mining capabilities are using BTCGuild. Simple interface, easy to setup.
What is the benefit of mining with BTCGuild over let's say Elgius? Well, for one, eleuthria doesn't go around implementing restrictive transaction inclusion policies as a knee-jerk reaction to FUD. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=334316.0;topicseen |
No
|
|
|
|
