Bitcoin Forum
December 13, 2024, 04:15:32 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: don't mine at BTCGuild  (Read 5325 times)
JimiQ84
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 406
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 17, 2013, 04:50:51 PM
 #21


these guys: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=140366.0
ZetaOS
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 140
Merit: 100


View Profile
September 17, 2013, 04:54:44 PM
 #22

Thanks mate!

Mine the easy way - CEX.io Build your own cloud miner!
Goedkoop bitcoins? www.koop-bitcoin.nl
Kluge
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218
Merit: 1015



View Profile
September 17, 2013, 04:55:10 PM
 #23

Why do we talk about 6 confs for a double-spend? Maybe for Gox. There are plenty of places which'd accept 2 or 3 confs as "reliable confirmation." Ele could already pull off the 33% attack.

(not that I care, except out of curiosity, and I enjoy reading the new ways Ele plans to cripple service to intentionally lose hashrate share if it breaches certain thresholds)
neutralist
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 85
Merit: 10


View Profile
September 18, 2013, 09:44:08 PM
 #24

shouldn't need to limit the hash rate artificially. Let the arms race run its course.
mechs
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 210
Merit: 100



View Profile
September 18, 2013, 09:51:09 PM
 #25

The hashrate should spread more. Slush, 50BTC, Eligius, EclipseMC, Bitminter are all good and responsible pools

Or use a real decentralized solution like P2Pool. Even if 100% would mine there, the network would be perfectly decentralized.
 
Really, it saddens me, that despite claiming different, most miners seem to not care about the Network and can't even live with a bit of variance.
Bitcoin is still in its infancy and miners need to take responsibility to help keep the server secure by spreading out the hashrate.
VeeMiner (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 752
Merit: 500


bitcoin hodler


View Profile
September 19, 2013, 08:47:55 AM
 #26

The hashrate should spread more. Slush, 50BTC, Eligius, EclipseMC, Bitminter are all good and responsible pools

Or use a real decentralized solution like P2Pool. Even if 100% would mine there, the network would be perfectly decentralized.
 
Really, it saddens me, that despite claiming different, most miners seem to not care about the Network and can't even live with a bit of variance.
Bitcoin is still in its infancy and miners need to take responsibility to help keep the server secure by spreading out the hashrate.

+1 exactly
birkomester
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 336
Merit: 100


View Profile
November 19, 2013, 06:37:03 PM
 #27

I mine at deepbit
mootinator
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 274
Merit: 250


View Profile
November 19, 2013, 06:54:02 PM
 #28

I mine at deepbit

That was definitely worth resurrecting this thread for. Welcome to bitcointalk!

No
cowandtea
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434
Merit: 250


View Profile
November 20, 2013, 08:34:04 AM
 #29

Nah, BTCguild is the best place to mine... Smiley

Magicmike514
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 15
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 20, 2013, 08:50:48 AM
 #30

FUD

There are reasons why people with solo-mining capabilities are using BTCGuild. Simple interface, easy to setup.

What is the benefit of mining with BTCGuild over let's say Elgius?
mootinator
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 274
Merit: 250


View Profile
November 20, 2013, 07:47:18 PM
 #31

FUD

There are reasons why people with solo-mining capabilities are using BTCGuild. Simple interface, easy to setup.

What is the benefit of mining with BTCGuild over let's say Elgius?

Well, for one, eleuthria doesn't go around implementing restrictive transaction inclusion policies as a knee-jerk reaction to FUD.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=334316.0;topicseen

No
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!