<<< Gee Unlimited>>>

[Rival]

Actually, I read that very post quite some time ago. I did find it somewhat helpful, although I felt it could use a little polish to smooth out the sharp edges.

If you wish to bring an argument, bring an argument. Vaguely disagreeing with unnamed points achieves nothing other than making it look like indeed, you did not read (and by read I mean process and understand the words individually and as a whole, not mindlessly scan) the thing.

It appears you are looking for arguments where none exist. If you have specific questions that you would like to offer up, I would be more than happy to attempt to address them.

[Atruk]

Actually, I read that very post quite some time ago. I did find it somewhat helpful, although I felt it could use a little polish to smooth out the sharp edges.

If you wish to bring an argument, bring an argument. Vaguely disagreeing with unnamed points achieves nothing other than making it look like indeed, you did not read (and by read I mean process and understand the words individually and as a whole, not mindlessly scan) the thing.

It appears you are looking for arguments where none exist. If you have specific questions that you would like to offer up, I would be more than happy to attempt to address them.

I believe by argument they mean you note what "sharp edges" exist and you suggest remedies both general and specific. There would probably be two possible outcomes: you make a case for actual improvements and they might be considered or you muck that certain things like identifying yourself or identifying actors in the bitcoin space don't feel or seem necessary.

You are rightly drawing criticism because instead of answering concerns with arguments constructed from reason and cohesive thoughts you post crap like:

Will those opportunities be new sources of profits for investors, or will the profits only come from satoshisquared?

Sorry for asking the dumb questions but it isn't quite clear to me.

Gee Unlimited is an "umbrella" for multiple income streams. SatoshiSquared.com is the first of what is expected to be many. In addition to development we also expect the acquisition of additional existing income streams, although development of new and innovative systems remains our focus. It is germane to note that we are based in the US, and must comply with all US regulations. This will out of necessity require that we do not invest in pure "gambling" websites as they are prohibited under current statutes.

This. You have one pseudogambling website where looking at the front page the income stream seems as though it may be reasonably be measured in Satoshis. Maybe with gambling you might be able to create more serious revenue streams, but based on your sample site http://satoshisquared.com/ your single example portfolio of work doesn't do much to offer confidence that you could deliver the large number of sites you hint at, any of which might have substantial revenue much less profit.

So instead you come and beg the forum for BTC500. Why BTC500? Maybe it is a nice even round number? The problem with it though is it doesn't seem like any sort of market influences have shaped it hinting that its origins may be rectal in nature. If you can't see the problem with asking for somewhere between a Corvette and a Dodge Viper's worth of BTC at today's prices in exchange for you offering the BTC equivalent of a fart app, vague promises, and polite dismissals.

[Rival]

Actually, I read that very post quite some time ago. I did find it somewhat helpful, although I felt it could use a little polish to smooth out the sharp edges.

If you wish to bring an argument, bring an argument. Vaguely disagreeing with unnamed points achieves nothing other than making it look like indeed, you did not read (and by read I mean process and understand the words individually and as a whole, not mindlessly scan) the thing.

It appears you are looking for arguments where none exist. If you have specific questions that you would like to offer up, I would be more than happy to attempt to address them.

I believe by argument they mean you note what "sharp edges" exist and you suggest remedies both general and specific. There would probably be two possible outcomes: you make a case for actual improvements and they might be considered or you muck that certain things like identifying yourself or identifying actors in the bitcoin space don't feel or seem necessary.

I suppose you are correct. I have no real interest in discussing or critiquing a document I did not generate. The document in question is little more than a blog post. Perhaps if others want to discuss it, the thread it exists on is a more suitable venue.

This. You have one pseudogambling website where looking at the front page the income stream seems as though it may be reasonably be measured in Satoshis. Maybe with gambling you might be able to create more serious revenue streams, but based on your sample site http://satoshisquared.com/ your single example portfolio of work doesn't do much to offer confidence that you could deliver the large number of sites you hint at, any of which might have substantial revenue much less profit.

So instead you come and beg the forum for BTC500. Why BTC500? Maybe it is a nice even round number? The problem with it though is it doesn't seem like any sort of market influences have shaped it hinting that its origins may be rectal in nature. If you can't see the problem with asking for somewhere between a Corvette and a Dodge Viper's worth of BTC at today's prices in exchange for you offering the BTC equivalent of a fart app, vague promises, and polite dismissals.

Thank you for your opinion and concerns. I find it regretful that you were not inspired to confidence by pilot website. It appears that in your case it has failed to achieve one of it's goals. I would correct you that the IPO cost of outstanding shares is 250BTC, not 500BTC as you quoted. At current market rates this is slightly more than $30,000. Web development and deployment is not free, nor is the acquisition of existing platforms. The development of SatoshiSquared.com alone exceeded $5000, and the additional projects will require even more. I believe the 250BTC solicitation to be a reasonable sum to finance the scale of projects we would like to move forward on. Perhaps later one of our future projects will inspire more confidence in you and you will decide to invest at that point.

[Atruk]

Perhaps later one of our future projects will inspire more confidence in you and you will decide to invest at that point.

I'll consult the Magic 8-ball:

Very Doubtful

I would correct you that the IPO cost of outstanding shares is 250BTC, not 500BTC as you quoted.

You still want BTC500. That you want BTC250 in the form of bitcoin and BTC250 in the form of sunshine, rainbows, warm fuzzies, and cheers of AMAZING COMPANY projected upon your self esteem doesn't much change that you are asking for BTC500 in value. That is unless you consider your own stake worthless or at least worth less than BTC250 yourself.

Web development and deployment is not free, nor is the acquisition of existing platforms. The development of SatoshiSquared.com alone exceeded $5000, and the additional projects will require even more.

Of course things have costs. Covering the costs of things you can not self finance is a motivation for seeking investment, generally in exchange for seeking or receiving investment some sort of return in the form of dividends would be ideal. At a minimum though shares should represent some sort of transferable equity.

And though you think offering:

A full list of shareholders and the number of shares of each will be maintained by Gee Unlimited for distributing dividends. These dividends will be paid the first day of every month. Anyone requiring a verification of shares or a transfer of shares should contact us here through PM.

and

Gee unlimited looks forward to players in the exchange space creating passthrough securities once the IPO has completed.

means, you aren't offering a reasonable market for these shares.

Additionally having to hope into eternity that your forum account is never hacked/phished or otherwise compromised Further hope is needed that you are consistently honest in your dealing through PMs. Hope is a poor substitute for security and verifiability.

There are numerous other problems with your proposal. Read moar, study moar, and stop presenting the arrangement of the bits of corn in your turds as investment opportunities until then.

[Rival]

There are numerous other problems with your proposal. Read moar, study moar, and stop presenting the arrangement of the bits of corn in your turds as investment opportunities until then.

Thank you once again for the constructive suggestions. It is always good advice for everyone to continue learning and improving themselves and their endeavors. I will certainly continue to do so upon your kind encouragement. I am glad we are in agreement, and I would also like to return the favor and encourage you to do so as well. Smarter minds make a smarter world.