Changing the rules in the End of the Bounty Campaign is a form of Abuse

[timphan coklat]

I do not understand why such rules are changed when the bounty has entered the final stage, and almost all such cases occur with potentially successful bounties.
Has it been previously arranged by the manager or the bounty team ...?
If true, this is totally unacceptable, because they did not appreciate the role of bounty participants who had promoted their projects.

[1715051975]

1715051975

[pawanjain]

I do not understand why such rules are changed when the bounty has entered the final stage, and almost all such cases occur with potentially successful bounties.
Has it been previously arranged by the manager or the bounty team ...?
If true, this is totally unacceptable, because they did not appreciate the role of bounty participants who had promoted their projects.

Most of the scam projects tend to do this. All they want is free advertising for their shit projects and raise money out of it and run away like pigs.
This is exactly why we should not join bounties randomly and instead we should do a hell lot of research about the project as well as the bounty manager before joining the bounty campaign.

[spydee1522]

Some may think that changing the rules of a bounty in the end of it is abusive, well for me it is a way of fraud project. Why they would have to change rules? and at the end? why not at the beginning? I treally think this is just another way so that several of the bounty hunters may not receive they payments or rewards.

Exactly mate, such projects are more than fraud  projects and i have come to the understanding that most of these issues pertaining to change in bounty rules at the end of the bounty campaign do happens when project managers and board realizes the token is increasing in much value and have the thought that definitely bounty hunters will dump whiles forgetting the bonus they gave to early investors.

[EmmaBen]

This seems to be an unending tale with several projects in the crypto space at the moment. With the level to which most of these projects treat hunters, it begs the question, where are rules against these ill practices in this industry? The hunters are always at the receiving end with no one to fight for them or protect their own rights? The earlier something is done about this, the better for everyone involved.

[mickey_miner]

Lately more and more bounties are not following its own rules. By changing it after the campaign was finish and its unacceptable a form of abuse, decietful, dishonest, in the beggining the stupid terms and condition which is all favor to the team. It should be stop! the bounties must be return to its previous state like 2016-2017 those abusive Bounty Managers whos practice unfair method must gain negative trust. join for the fight

As far as I remember almost all projects indicate that they are paired to change the rules at any time. But recently very often began to change them and to refer to this point.

[retnoanjani]

it feels sad if there are changes in any form when the project is over, because I have experienced it when the project has ended there is a change about the deduction of prize allocations. and I realize that from the beginning written in the bounty thread like: the team and the developer has the right to change the project rules at any time     so, there is no need to blame because those who have rights about the project rules.

You're right, even though it's disappointing but there's not much we can do. The rules were written from the beginning, the developer team and the bounty manager have the right to make any changes, and as a bounty hunter, if we have decided to join, we must understand that as a risk. No doubt, unfavourable market conditions are the reason for all this. When the market is conducive as in 2017, bounties also become very profitable.

[albon]

If the rules change during the bounty and the bounty manager has stated that he and the project team will have the rights to change them during the bounty period, this is not a problem, But after the bounty ends, they add or modify rules for all campaigns so that bounty hunters do not get stakes or they get small tokens, This is deceptive work that indicates that the project team and its contributors are a group of scammers, I suggest that there is a third party who gets bounty BTC or ETH coins before the bounty starts and who distributes it to the participants after the end of the bounty, and anyone who wishes to receive the project's tokens can purchase it from the project team through BTC or ETH which obtained from the bounty campaign.

[Mulann2]

Sometimes the team will change rules after bounty ended especially the one involving payment, some team will decide to change the date and time which payment was suppose to be paid and bm will just go along with it or support the team to treat hunters badly, not all bm are to blame but some are not helping matters.

[dengpei]

Sometimes it is imperative to change the rules midway or at the end of the program especially when you notice that what you initially set out to do is not working or your system is open to abuse. Yes, bounty hunters might get angry and all but the real end result that is desired when one holds a bounty campaign is not just to distribute free tokens but to raise awareness of the project and bring in investors. If it's not working then it can be changed. Also, bounty hunters end up dumping their tokens anyway and tanking the token price so it seems wise to pay them in drips and drabs!