Bitcoin Forum
April 04, 2020, 12:59:47 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.19.1 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  

Warning: Moderators do not remove likely scams. You must use your own brain: caveat emptor. Watch out for Ponzi schemes. Do not invest more than you can afford to lose.

Warning: One or more bitcointalk.org users have reported that they strongly believe that the creator of this topic is a scammer. (Login to see the detailed trust ratings.) While the bitcointalk.org administration does not verify such claims, you should proceed with extreme caution.
Pages: « 1 ... 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 [281] 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 ... 508 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated]  (Read 770358 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
Mabsark
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 826
Merit: 1000


View Profile
December 15, 2013, 10:05:45 PM
 #5601

A 24 Th/s system would require about 1500 chips. I wonder how many sample chips Ken was supposed to be getting?

The sample batch was supposed to be received in November, with low volume production in December and full production in around February. That's according to the time frame posted by Ken in the 2nd post in this thread and according to when he said he'd paid the NRE costs.

So, where are the chips? Pictures? Proof of mining?

Didn't Ken say he had to redesign the chips to work with Intellihash? How long is that going to take eASIC to implement? Another 9 weeks? Will Ken get new sample chips? If so when? If not and he moves straight to low volume production, what if the chips don't work properly?

The chips are already a month behind schedule and the reason given was basically equivalent to DownloadMoreRAM. And someone is asking for 0.006 per share!  Roll Eyes 0.00006 more like!  Cheesy

1586005187
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1586005187

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1586005187
Reply with quote  #2

1586005187
Report to moderator
AWARD-WINNING
CRYPTO CASINO
ASKGAMBLERS
PLAYERS CHOICE 2019
PROUD
PARTNER OF
1500+
GAMES
2 MIN
CASH-OUTS
24/7
SUPPORT
100s OF
FREE SPINS
PLAY NOW
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1586005187
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1586005187

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1586005187
Reply with quote  #2

1586005187
Report to moderator
1586005187
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1586005187

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1586005187
Reply with quote  #2

1586005187
Report to moderator
VolanicEruptor
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 250



View Profile
December 15, 2013, 10:31:55 PM
 #5602

Which Great Leader do you mean? Ken or Kleeck?

So it's the end of the week now.. and our great leader hasn't been online for 2 days.
If he's late with his promise, he could at least acknowledge that, instead of just hiding


who's kleeck?  

RoadStress
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1862
Merit: 1002


View Profile
December 15, 2013, 10:50:26 PM
 #5603

http://www.businessinsider.com/knc-sells-nearly-28-million-neptunes-2013-12

KNC has already sold the equivalent of Active Mining promised payback.

It may seem like bad news and could be, but it also shows how big the market is for a successful product.

Maybe it's not so unrealistic that Active Mining can pay back 0025

To be precise:
KnC Neptunes: 3'000GH/s @ $12k = $4 per GH/s

Kenneth:


256GH/s @ $3599.40 = $14.06 per GH/s, or x3.5 times more expensive

And this is a prepaid order from Ken's Underground Fortress, with no shipping date Sad
The closest thing to a shipping date on that site is this jewel:

Fast-Hash One Silver Edition Bitcoin Mining Machine
64 GH/s Expands to 6.144 TH/s                      <<Runs on advanced Chinese 12ax7 logic ??
Upgradeable To Next Generation
Hashing Cards
AVAILABLE FOR PREPAID PRE-ORDER ONLY
Limited Availability on these units (Shipping Starts November 2013)
ESTIMATED DELIVERY DATE WILL BE DISPLAYED UPON CHECKOUT                  <<pay up first, then we'll tell you when we ship

So yeah, comparing the virtual identity known as Active Mining to real companies could be pretty depressing.


It's amazing how easily are people fooled with pretty words!

H/w Hosting Directory & Reputation - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=622998.0
minerpart
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 280
Merit: 250

IIIIII====II====IIIIII


View Profile
December 15, 2013, 11:07:36 PM
 #5604

The chips are already a month behind schedule and the reason given was basically equivalent to DownloadMoreRAM. And someone is asking for 0.006 per share!  Roll Eyes 0.00006 more like!  Cheesy



Mabsark, you were asked a few days ago how many ACtM shares you were still holding after you made a hasty exit 2 or so months ago to get into Labcoin. It looks like you sold them all then?

You clearly want to buy back into ACtM at the lowest price possible and this blatant FUDing just tells me that you actually value ACtM highly - otherwise why would you want to buy back in?

So yes, thanks for confirming through your FUD attempt that ACtM is indeed an excellent proposition - but really, we knew already.
Mabsark
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 826
Merit: 1000


View Profile
December 15, 2013, 11:35:41 PM
 #5605

The chips are already a month behind schedule and the reason given was basically equivalent to DownloadMoreRAM. And someone is asking for 0.006 per share!  Roll Eyes 0.00006 more like!  Cheesy



Mabsark, you were asked a few days ago how many ACtM shares you were still holding after you made a hasty exit 2 or so months ago to get into Labcoin. It looks like you sold them all then?

You clearly want to buy back into ACtM at the lowest price possible and this blatant FUDing just tells me that you actually value ACtM highly - otherwise why would you want to buy back in?

So yes, thanks for confirming through your FUD attempt that ACtM is indeed an excellent proposition - but really, we knew already.

I haven't got any shares in anything at the moment and believe it will be more profitable to just hold my BTC for a couple more months. And yes, at 0.00006 BTC per share, I probably do value ActM shares too high.  Cheesy

Also, I see you can't answer my questions and try to ignore the issues by claiming I'm just spreading FUD. Will it take another 9 weeks for eASIC to implement the "IntelliHash" changes? If so, will new samples only arrive in February with full production not ready till May?

These are real issues which Ken needs to address as it's looking like ActM are going to be months behind schedule.
minerpart
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 280
Merit: 250

IIIIII====II====IIIIII


View Profile
December 15, 2013, 11:39:52 PM
 #5606

Mabsark I don't buy that atall.

If you are not buying shares in ACtM then why on Earth are you on here then?

You don't need to post on here everyday to hold your Bitcoin. I would love to know how much you have now, you took a big hit on Labcoin? Why risk what little you have left on ACtM why don't you just keep what you have. What if ACtM is Labcoin 2?
VolanicEruptor
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 250



View Profile
December 15, 2013, 11:41:14 PM
 #5607

just the act of finding an exchange and proving that our shares survived and making them tradable again will be enough to boost the price above .001
if the shares can survive 2 exchange shut downs then it will no longer be a concern.. and then the valuation will be on profit speculation ONLY, as it should.
but then that of course means Ken would have to actually verify our shares, which was supposed to be done by now

Stuartuk
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 250



View Profile
December 15, 2013, 11:54:34 PM
 #5608

VE the share value is not really much about speculation and Capital Gain anymore. We are on the verge of deploying on a globally significant scale. It's just a few weeks away and every share is currently worth holding on to for the divs. If you now seem to recognise that ACtM are making genuine progress then you too should be holding for the divs rather than speculating on price rises. The divs will give this company's shares value, long-term value. ACtM could still be significant players in the global hash network in 5 years from now which is something a lot of short-sighted investors seem to forget. Care to work out the total divs per share from 5 years of ACtM holding 5-10% of Global hash with BTC at 1k. Then what about with BTC at 15k? And what about 50k?

Look at the bigger picture.

VolanicEruptor
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 250



View Profile
December 15, 2013, 11:59:57 PM
 #5609

Then what about with BTC at 15k? And what about 50k?

Look at the bigger picture.



Apparently the great leader hates it when Bitcoin goes up.  He says its bad for the company.

Stuartuk
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 250



View Profile
December 16, 2013, 12:08:11 AM
 #5610

You just passed up an opportunity to broaden peoples restricted views of this stock to take an immature little swipe at the guy doing all the hardwork. Do you think anything you have done on here over the past 6 months has done your own position any favours? You just seem to make mistake after mistake. Do you ever have down-time where you look at your own actions and question them in anyway?
Mabsark
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 826
Merit: 1000


View Profile
December 16, 2013, 12:57:31 AM
 #5611

What are the current plans for chip development?
ActiveMining is developing a 28nm Bitcoin mining chip using eASIC.
  • Chip samples delivered in 9 weeks;
  • Low-volume chip production starting in 12 weeks, using an e-beam process;
  • Normal volume chip production starting in 16-18 weeks.

The samples were delivered according to Ken and had to be redesigned (BFL comes to mind, how long did it take them?).

Low volume production has now gone from December to February.
Normal volume production has now gone to late April/early May.

There'll probably be 1-2 thousand sample chips, enough to build a 24 Th/s miner. As previously shown, that'll provide about 80 Satoshis per share per day, with a 2.5% reduction per day.

Low volume production will probably be about 100,000 chips. With each chip capable of 16 Gh/s, that's 1.6 Ph/s, which will take a fair bit of time to build miners out of. That's about 67 x 24 Th/s miners. Let's be generous and say they'll finish bringing that hash power online when normal volume production commences beginning of May. With 50% mining that'd give them 0.8 Ph/s. The current 30 day rate of increase for the network is 78%, giving a network hash rate of around 116.2 Ph/s at the beginning of May, which would give ActM about 0.7% of the network hash rate.

With 1% giving 504 BTC, 0.7% would provide 352.8 BTC per round or 25.2 BTC per day. Distributed over 10 million shares, that's 252 Satoshis per share per day, with a 2.5% reduction per day.

It's not looking good for ActM share holders.  Sad They've waited all this time and they're going to get less dust than the Avalons gave them.  Cry
VolanicEruptor
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 250



View Profile
December 16, 2013, 01:01:56 AM
 #5612

mabstark that was a lot of effort just to tell us that!  You really sat down and gave those fingers a workout.  Wow... If anything, putting that much time into posting that actually puts upward pressure on the stock price.  After all, who would sacrifice that much of themselves if they didint have interest and motives Smiley

mannybitcoins
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 227
Merit: 100


View Profile
December 16, 2013, 01:18:15 AM
 #5613

mabstark that was a lot of effort just to tell us that!  You really sat down and gave those fingers a workout.  Wow... If anything, putting that much time into posting that actually puts upward pressure on the stock price.  After all, who would sacrifice that much of themselves if they didint have interest and motives Smiley

Isn't it obvious VE? He just wants cheap shares. Don't sell your shares to this FUDster guys, make him pay.


QDAO USDQ     |     Platinum StatableCoins: USDQ KRWQ CNYQ JPYQ
█▀   $1MLN BOUNTY POOL   / / / J O I N / / /   ▀█
WHITEPAPER                FACEBOOK                TWITTER                TELEGRAM                ANN THREAD
Mabsark
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 826
Merit: 1000


View Profile
December 16, 2013, 01:26:10 AM
 #5614

mabstark that was a lot of effort just to tell us that!  You really sat down and gave those fingers a workout.  Wow... If anything, putting that much time into posting that actually puts upward pressure on the stock price.  After all, who would sacrifice that much of themselves if they didint have interest and motives Smiley

Isn't it obvious VE? He just wants cheap shares. Don't sell your shares to this FUDster guys, make him pay.



How about disputing the argument with some logic and facts?
mannybitcoins
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 227
Merit: 100


View Profile
December 16, 2013, 01:31:35 AM
Last edit: December 16, 2013, 01:45:23 AM by mannybitcoins
 #5615

mabstark that was a lot of effort just to tell us that!  You really sat down and gave those fingers a workout.  Wow... If anything, putting that much time into posting that actually puts upward pressure on the stock price.  After all, who would sacrifice that much of themselves if they didint have interest and motives Smiley

Isn't it obvious VE? He just wants cheap shares. Don't sell your shares to this FUDster guys, make him pay.



How about disputing the argument with some logic and facts?

What, like with fancy numbers you pulled out of your ass? We just need to trust Ken. He made promises, promises he won't break.

...I would continue this cause it's just too much fun, but I'm kidding man, just being sarcastic. This thread is a joke and I know you're just trying to bring some logic into it, but at this point I think it's just useless. Pankkake is right, this has gotten baddddd. Ken should not be linking to this thread as the official discussion on Active Mining, it's just too damn embarrassing.

EDIT: Not saying I don't trust Ken, cause I do, regardless of his poor PR moves in the past. Just saying this thread is a joke and should not be taken seriously, at all.

QDAO USDQ     |     Platinum StatableCoins: USDQ KRWQ CNYQ JPYQ
█▀   $1MLN BOUNTY POOL   / / / J O I N / / /   ▀█
WHITEPAPER                FACEBOOK                TWITTER                TELEGRAM                ANN THREAD
mannybitcoins
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 227
Merit: 100


View Profile
December 16, 2013, 01:55:31 AM
 #5616

Is THAT what VE is doing? Setting ip the stage to buy thousands of cheap shares of a company which has not delivered product and whose progress remains mysterious so that he can lose money in the long run?

How clever of you to figure that out.

mabstark that was a lot of effort just to tell us that!  You really sat down and gave those fingers a workout.  Wow... If anything, putting that much time into posting that actually puts upward pressure on the stock price.  After all, who would sacrifice that much of themselves if they didint have interest and motives Smiley

Isn't it obvious VE? He just wants cheap shares. Don't sell your shares to this FUDster guys, make him pay.



I love it. I think you guys are too far gone.

QDAO USDQ     |     Platinum StatableCoins: USDQ KRWQ CNYQ JPYQ
█▀   $1MLN BOUNTY POOL   / / / J O I N / / /   ▀█
WHITEPAPER                FACEBOOK                TWITTER                TELEGRAM                ANN THREAD
Mabsark
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 826
Merit: 1000


View Profile
December 16, 2013, 02:06:36 AM
 #5617

Do YOU believe in Ken?

Do you believe in life after Ken?...by Share?

Wait, wait, wait...here's a better one.

Hey diddle diddle, Ken had a fiddle,
With share holders with brains made of mash,
All the trolls laughed and had such fun,
While Ken ran away with all the cash.

mannybitcoins
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 227
Merit: 100


View Profile
December 16, 2013, 02:07:13 AM
 #5618

Do YOU believe in Ken?

Do YOU believe in Active Mining?

For a limited time only, you can buy 100,000 shares of Active Mining from me for 1128 bitcoin.

Here is how it will work, first you send me a PM stating that you actually believe in Active Mining.

Then I will provide you with my bitcoin address.

When the coins are received, I will send you and Ken an email saying that when the exchange opens, 100,000 of my shares be transferred to you.

This will be done without escrow directly through emails.

Are you a believer?



I have a better idea. How about you provide me access to your email address associated with your Active Mining shares. I will then transfer the shares once they become active on crypto-trade.com to my account, and then I will transfer you the 1128 bitcoin.

Of course, this will be done without escrow, as any trusted transfer should.


QDAO USDQ     |     Platinum StatableCoins: USDQ KRWQ CNYQ JPYQ
█▀   $1MLN BOUNTY POOL   / / / J O I N / / /   ▀█
WHITEPAPER                FACEBOOK                TWITTER                TELEGRAM                ANN THREAD
VolanicEruptor
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 250



View Profile
December 16, 2013, 03:15:17 AM
 #5619

I'm wondering how USD and other currencies can be exchanged in a decentralized manner through color coin. Or will that require Master coin or ripple? Of course this may be too off topic.

Colored Coins can be used for any virtual asset.

Damn Vigil you are lucky.  In the last 3 days you are the only one worthy enough to feel the warm embrace of our great leader.  Perhaps tomorrow he will appear from the clouds and speak to us mere humans

mannybitcoins
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 227
Merit: 100


View Profile
December 16, 2013, 03:20:23 AM
 #5620

eASIC vouched for Active Mining and took them in as a partner makes me think things will turn out okay.
That NEVER happened. VMC is a CLIENT not a PARTNER. How many times does this has to be explained?

I understand the difference, though it was more of a semantic error on my part, so I've edited my post. Companies like eASIC do not take in just any company that wants to work with them, regardless of capital. They qualify companies to make sure they are a good fit. When they work with the likes of Seagate and other big players, qualifying companies is not optional, but a required process. This does not mean success is ever guaranteed, but it sure makes me more confident in the process, and progress.

QDAO USDQ     |     Platinum StatableCoins: USDQ KRWQ CNYQ JPYQ
█▀   $1MLN BOUNTY POOL   / / / J O I N / / /   ▀█
WHITEPAPER                FACEBOOK                TWITTER                TELEGRAM                ANN THREAD
Pages: « 1 ... 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 [281] 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 ... 508 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!