Sending in fake ID for KYC

[hellyeahent]

I think that fake KYC is an absolute norm. Not everyone wants to leave their personal to just anyone and if they were able to cheat the system, they can only be praised. It's cool and I think it's worth trying to do as well

[1713515775]

1713515775

[1713515775]

1713515775

[yrrehc16]

This is what i thought about cryptocurrency Know Your Client.
They are just looking for the names to be fitted on the Identification Card.
Some of them also require some proof of billing but as we know they will just look for the name on it.

[tridverju]

You should be more careful of choosing the projects, you participate in. But I agree with you, the ICOs should be more careful with out personal data, because it not unusual, that out docs are going into the web. The ICOs should have an option for all docs, delete all them at once, if they do not collect enough funds.

[Ulya63]

Hardly they check everyone in the bounty, it's just ridiculous. If judged by the documents, they collect the current for a tick to match the rules so to speak and to seem more solid. No one knows how to store this confidential information, some ico projects even sell it on the black market. If the project seems suspicious, sometimes it is better not to risk it and sleep well.

[Arcanefist]

I just was brought up to speed on groups of people sending in fake/Photoshopped ID's by scanning public records to defeat the KYC process and it seemingly is very easy to do.  It appears that many people sent in fake documentation to the Bob's and Polymath KYC and had no hassles.  How do these companies verify people if all they have to go on is public information?  Did they even really check the ID's or were they simply collected the data?  How rampant do you think this is?  How many of us are complete fools for turning in our documents when others simply faked it.  Now they have our data and the people who faked it are still secure.

NOT FAIR.

I am glad that there is a possibility of sending fake news. For me it is very important and if there is an opportunity not to send the passport data to anybody that I will make so. It is correct and profitable

[Jonnitor]

I concur. When you enter a "photograph of an international ID" in Google, numerous photographs show up. A few people send them. In questionable airdrops and ISO, I don't fill in the KYc, in those that intrigue me, I'll send my information. It additionally appears to me that the KYC method does not compare to the idea of "privacy".

[vasilisc555]

It's just that if you send fake documents, it is very likely that you will be blocked from accessing sales or receiving tokens.
Be honest.

[Genemind]

I think most people would send some else's identification on KYCs since it is really dangerous to send your details on KYC just to get your bounties. I think this is not illegal as long as you have their permission to use their document. I believe most bounty hunters or even investors do this to protect their identity.

[masternode]

Once I passed KYC. At the end of the bounty, the company announced the need for KYC, and I was sorry for the work done. Now I'm regret about that.
A fake ID for KYC is a good idea, but it’s better to refuse a few dollars and save privacy.

If i's just a bounty and not a large investment I see the point using fake IDs, especially if they change rules and require KYC at the end of the bounty. Most do this with a dark motivation anyway, speculating that a large part just won't bother with it and they keep the rewards for themself.

[pragna]

I just was brought up to speed on groups of people sending in fake/Photoshopped ID's by scanning public records to defeat the KYC process and it seemingly is very easy to do.  It appears that many people sent in fake documentation to the Bob's and Polymath KYC and had no hassles.  How do these companies verify people if all they have to go on is public information?  Did they even really check the ID's or were they simply collected the data?  How rampant do you think this is?  How many of us are complete fools for turning in our documents when others simply faked it.  Now they have our data and the people who faked it are still secure.

NOT FAIR.

Actually it is very impossible to collect all information of a man to create a fake ID card unless they physically stolen all information of an ID card. On the other hand they may serve a campaign and collect all information from customer with this campaign. Everything is possible who has a negative intention about a matter. Until that KYC is very important to catch false account.

[DronV]

I concur. When you enter a "photograph of an international ID" in Google, numerous photographs show up. A few people send them. In questionable airdrops and ISO, I don't fill in the KYc, in those that intrigue me, I'll send my information. It additionally appears to me that the KYC method does not compare to the idea of "privacy".

It would not be a good idea to send in any kind of fake information to people in charge of the ICO's, what if they need to meet with you?

[bitkanu]

I concur. When you enter a "photograph of an international ID" in Google, numerous photographs show up. A few people send them. In questionable airdrops and ISO, I don't fill in the KYc, in those that intrigue me, I'll send my information. It additionally appears to me that the KYC method does not compare to the idea of "privacy".

It would not be a good idea to send in any kind of fake information to people in charge of the ICO's, what if they need to meet with you?

The devs meeting you is just simply doesnt make sense but using fake ID break the rules of KYC and making KYC meaningless.
also it can be misused for laundering money since the point of KYC is to prevent any form ofmoney laundering

[fanji]

then after someone else faked their identity for KYC, then you want to follow those who cheated? in my opinion when other people cheat, you should never give up, and remember if you are hesitant to do KYC process on some bounties or airdrops, it is better not to do it, sometimes not just developers who often feel disadvantaged, but many bounty participants or airdrops are trapped to do the KYC process and after that their data is sold on the black market

[hirngespenst]

This Incident has happened happens in not only Polymath or Bobs, Rather This Fake and photoshopped ID, documents are also accepting in every project's KYC. I have been seeing many ICO projects bounty campaign Since January, In every KYC, bounty hunters or investors submitted fake KYC documents and the project team couldn't verify the fake documents. ICOsid is a very popular website to perform as a KYC supplier but people submit fake ID card on ICOSID too in Shivom Bounty. So, This will be continue as i see

[the1arty]

I just was brought up to speed on groups of people sending in fake/Photoshopped ID's by scanning public records to defeat the KYC process and it seemingly is very easy to do.  It appears that many people sent in fake documentation to the Bob's and Polymath KYC and had no hassles.  How do these companies verify people if all they have to go on is public information?  Did they even really check the ID's or were they simply collected the data?  How rampant do you think this is?  How many of us are complete fools for turning in our documents when others simply faked it.  Now they have our data and the people who faked it are still secure.

NOT FAIR.

I doubt that to do so is a good idea, if you are contributing to the project, then, first of all, you trust it with your money and hopefully, your documents will be safe.
I got a good example when KYC helped my friend. When he contributed to Centra Tech, the NYC court found his details and put him into the collective statement... That is a big advantage, secondly, faking your documents may cause you some big problems.

[mimienamphine]

Kyc is one of the great tools that will make cryptocurrency well adopted because people will fell safe kind of .But most people in cryptocurrency do not really accept the idea of passing KYC so some people will try to avoid it altogether or use a fake identity so that they cannot be traced .

[bangjoe]

It must be assumed that the requirement for bounty hunters to be tested by KYC is generally illegal. This check is carried out mainly for the purpose of prevention of possible laundering of dirty money. At the same time, the ICO team itself simply has to save this data in case certain government agencies request data for specific individuals. The ICO teams themselves have not yet been duly tested and among them there is a large percentage of scammers. Therefore, it is very dangerous to transfer our data to them. Based on this, I fully allow the transfer of non-personal data to them.

KYC was basically implemented for good purposes but it was very ironic when the testers were not tested at all, in fact only a few people who did dirty money laundering and more ICOs were fraudulent so I think those who should give KYC are teams from the ICO so there is no scam

[riskarcher]

This is because the agency is lacking professionalism in carrying out the data verification process because as long as I fill in the data, the Kyc does not ask for a mobile number that allows the agency to verify by code.

[Stradivarioos]

I think that there is no injustice, just someone thought of it. Personally, I've never had a KYC. I think that this loophole will be eliminated, so do not worry.

[Akpuv]

I just was brought up to speed on groups of people sending in fake/Photoshopped ID's by scanning public records to defeat the KYC process and it seemingly is very easy to do.  It appears that many people sent in fake documentation to the Bob's and Polymath KYC and had no hassles.  How do these companies verify people if all they have to go on is public information?  Did they even really check the ID's or were they simply collected the data?  How rampant do you think this is?  How many of us are complete fools for turning in our documents when others simply faked it.  Now they have our data and the people who faked it are still secure.

NOT FAIR.

I am not surprised of the success of those people who send in fake documents. After all, nothing is really been verified.