SHA256 checksum of Adobe Flash Player 11.9.900.117

[MysteryMiner]

This might sound as odd question but can some well known members here post checksums for full installer of latest Adobe Flash Player? The plugin version full installer, not the web installer crap. And sign the message with known address they control.

[1714796711]

1714796711

[1714796711]

1714796711

[1714796711]

1714796711

[1714796711]

1714796711

[1714796711]

1714796711

[anonameous]

I'm not well known or probably that trustworthy, but anyways I got install_flash_player.exe (you wanted the Windows one right?) the site said it was v11 but didn't tell me if it was 11.9.900.117 or an older or newer minor version, I'm assuming its the latest.

3e8d832591aff54510f9904b6348e2e2351a28a4ef137f4f19535b747c00c89e

[MysteryMiner]

I also got the SHA256 checksum for full version that is 3e8d832591aff54510f9904b6348e2e2351a28a4ef137f4f19535b747c00c89e

After navigating seriously broken Adobe.com page here are the magic links containing full versions for all normal browsers http://download.macromedia.com/pub/flashplayer/current/support/install_flash_player.exe and this one for Internet Explorer tool used to open mozilla.org and download Firefox http://download.macromedia.com/pub/flashplayer/current/support/install_flash_player_ax.exe

I'm really paranoid about Flash Player. It is because some time ago I was receiving the flash player installers with broken digital signatures and different checksums than using the same direct links from another network connection or Tor. As I understand from Snowden leaks and Lavabit case the digital signatures cannot be trusted because the spooks can ask for private key copies used for signing. Comparing SHA256 with different people in secure manner is a way to check that we all receive the same files.

You might not be trustworthy for commerce but at least it is less valuable for NSA to control scammer identity here instead of trusted hero member.