I see loads of your opinions in there^^
Well, what else would you expect someone in a discussion to do? NOT to express a point of view?
But since you like picking on someone for simply stating what an article of the popular Wikipedia encyclopedia says,
That sentence is either a. ignorant (as in, you didn't even read what I wrote) or b. downright malicious (as in, you're blatantly exaggerating our interactions to garner sympathy and put yourself in the high ground) because not only I have apologized for asking you'd be a troll after you claim something preposterous (which is an immature stretch to claim this is "picking on someone") but I also pointed out the flaws in your arguments. Stop playing the victim, you're too old for this type of behaviour.
This is a good way to get some posts in. Talk all day long about if there is any fake news around or not, re-define all kinds of stuff we are talking about, and make it all sound like you are saying something. More words. More posts. Great. That's what we are here for. A forum, right?
I find curious how you're implying I'm spamming... while your current post adds nothing to the discussion. Besides being a bit of an ass.
And no, we're not headed towards global cooling (something I have evidenced before) and much less to an Ice Age. To claim there is a possibility of Ice Age only points your lack of familiarity with basic concepts of geological-climatic trends given we're in an INTERGLACIAL PERIOD and we'll remain on it for a long while. (Or maybe I'm the fool here and you have substantial evidence pointing otherwise. If that's the case, by all means present it.)
Bottom line: if you're gonna keep avoiding discussing the subject and resort to these sleazy techniques, decker, then you can consider our discussion over.
And Spendulus, if you're reading this, I'll address your points in the short future.
