Bitcoin Forum
April 19, 2024, 07:35:02 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 26.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Data Science In Blockchain Technology: cnn-proof Blockchains  (Read 146 times)
obszoenling (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 448
Merit: 100



View Profile
February 24, 2018, 12:28:26 PM
 #1

I lately thought much about the growth of data science and blockchain technology.
Both sectors are making huge progresses at the time we are speaking. Yet, both technologies currently grow separately.

Todays Convolution Neuronal Networks have already exceeded human sensory capabilites. Their "weak" point is the lack of data in many fields, that prevents a sufficent training for optimal pattern recognition.
If something doesn't lack in blockchain technology, then it's data. The data is also free to access and distinct.
Thus, I expect an expansion of pattern recognition systems into the field of blockchain technology.

In the current stage of cryptocurrency acceptance this shouldn't be a threat. But in the near future, when cryptocurrency spread its usage and develope more use cases, pattern recognition becomes a powerful tool to analyze the blockchain and its users. Although wallet addresses are not bound to an actual indivdiual, its patterns can draw conclusions about personal behaviour, preferences, circumstances. Only small amounts of meta data are able to allow determined inference, which carries huge power with it.

Like most technological enhancements this implies many benefits, but it might also imply dangers, especially if this data gets not treated responsibly.

Many governments are working on software to analyze blockchains. Not in terms of pattern recoginition, but to be able evaluate specific cash flows. This aspect becomes important when it comes to tax payments.

Nevertheless I am very confident that it's only a matter of time until cnn's absorb blockchains. That's why it's in my opinion important to discuss the consequences and how cryptocurrencies should handle this matter. Developing CNN-proof blockchains could get a thing in the future and become major feature for privacy coins.

Why are your opinions?

★ ★ ★ ★ ★   DeepOnion    Anonymous and Untraceable Cryptocurrency    TOR INTEGRATED & SECURED   ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
› › › › ›  JOIN THE NEW AIRDROP ✈️        VERIFIED WITH DEEPVAULT  ‹ ‹ ‹ ‹ ‹
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬   ANN  WHITEPAPER  FACEBOOK  TWITTER  YOUTUBE  FORUM   ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
1713555302
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713555302

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713555302
Reply with quote  #2

1713555302
Report to moderator
1713555302
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713555302

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713555302
Reply with quote  #2

1713555302
Report to moderator
The network tries to produce one block per 10 minutes. It does this by automatically adjusting how difficult it is to produce blocks.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1713555302
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713555302

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713555302
Reply with quote  #2

1713555302
Report to moderator
1713555302
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713555302

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713555302
Reply with quote  #2

1713555302
Report to moderator
pereira4
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1610
Merit: 1183


View Profile
February 24, 2018, 04:39:26 PM
 #2

Jeff Garzik is working on "bloq", a company that does exactly that (to analyze transactions and try to guess where the money is coming from). This is one of the main reasons I never trusted Jeff Garzik, I think he sold out for the NSA or something.

As far as if this is viable or not, im not sure. I tested back then a mixer, I think it was helix, and it had so many options, like mixing the coins with freshly minted coins and then recieve back in random batches at random times and through Tor. Trying to trace back the original transaction would be a mess and a waste of resources.

Now I regret doing that test, because I did it with like 1 BTC, and now that 1 BTC I cannot sell, since the government would ask me where that money came from, and explaining to them the truth (that I was just testing a mixer) might not cut it and they may just steal my money.
HeRetiK
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2912
Merit: 2066


Cashback 15%


View Profile
February 24, 2018, 11:46:01 PM
 #3

Blockchain analysis tools are being used by the IRS, so this is already happening. Albeit at a relatively small, yet targeted scale:

http://fortune.com/2017/08/22/irs-tax-cheats-bitcoin-chainalysis/

I'm not sure whether Chainalysis uses neural networks though.


It will be interesting to see what the impact of 2nd layer scaling solutions on blockchain analysis will be, given that a lot of the data that was previously publicly available will then be missing.

.
.HUGE.
▄██████████▄▄
▄█████████████████▄
▄█████████████████████▄
▄███████████████████████▄
▄█████████████████████████▄
███████▌██▌▐██▐██▐████▄███
████▐██▐████▌██▌██▌██▌██
█████▀███▀███▀▐██▐██▐█████

▀█████████████████████████▀

▀███████████████████████▀

▀█████████████████████▀

▀█████████████████▀

▀██████████▀▀
█▀▀▀▀











█▄▄▄▄
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
.
CASINSPORTSBOOK
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
▀▀▀▀█











▄▄▄▄█
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!