I'm not in any way naive. Using a logical fallacy such as that to discredit the other person's opinion without basis isn't really all that convincing.
Your position seems to be that anyone with any experience that's actually out in the world doing something will be corrupt. That ignores an awful lot, I think, such as proper structure, a system of oversight and checks and balances, which obviously need to be worked on over there also, etc., etc., etc.
do you have a solution/suggestion? it's fine if you don't and it's fine if your solution is to do nothing in the belief that the foundation, or anything like it is unnecessary, however, painting someone as naive because they don't share that opinion isn't actually a point of logic in any conversation, and some might say it shows quite a bit of naivete itself.
so, if you've got a solution, please propose it and support it if you can. If not, no biggie, I'm just looking to generate conversation on what's next, as there is a next. There is always a next.
Yawn... How fastidious you are.
There is not any solution at this point rather than the Bitcoin foundation just cease to exist. Simple as that. The Bitcoin foundation is like a building erected on soft sand: no matter what material is used, it will always crumble apart.
