Postponing Listing on the Exchange due bear market conditions

[Soaveth541]

In my opinion, the first buzz attracts a lot of small time investors who expects a lot from ICO and try to become rich overnight and when this expectations are not met a mass dump happens. But the ICOs which shows new innovations and makes proper business model always survives.

[1715229057]

1715229057

[Abohadan331]

I think the initial hype generates overly ambitious expectation. People are desperate for a getaway coin. And whenever a coin doesn't live upto this expectation, it gets dumped massively. But I dont think legit innovative projects should stress too much mostly because people nowadays dont put all eggs in one basket.

[Ibeild441]

Generally a lot of people get attracted at the beginning. If the project doesn't live up to the expectation, the obvious result is downfall. But if the project is good enough it will get the positive result.

[Invigorated]

It is quite understandable that must projects are taking this option. A project that values its idea wouldn't want to list in these conditions. It is highly likely that once a token gets listed in this market conditions, it might never recover the dip and thus, devaluing the project. Delaying listing is just a way to preserve the value of the project which should be the sole purpose of the developers.

[AgentZero23]

In this thread I will never offend or discriminate against a crypto project, if one of the crypto projects goes the same way as in this thread, well Im so sorry

I feel sorry for the past few months that many ICO investors and bounty hunters have had problems with the crypto projects they support. This is related to the distribution of tokens and listed in the exchange which is always postponed due to bear market problems, of course in my opinion that is the reason that is only made to increase popularity because it is increasingly blasphemed with so many people who are interested and curious (one of the marketing techniques which is weird but believe me its work)

But what I have noticed here is the reason for the bear market, well, they assume that if they force it to be able to listing as soon as possible, then what happens is a massive dump and will never be able to rise. This is strange, none of the crypto currency does not experience a dump.

Of course this is a strange reason if the developer is a professional in the world of economics and crypto, why? Because many new altcoins are listing in the exchange, they experience a dump but manage to rise again.

Reasons to avoid losses on the part of investors, really? Investor loss or loss from the Developer? I'm not sure they think of investors and bounty participants, how do you think about the project problem like this?

I have promoted a lot of projects and some of them until now don't get listed in a decent exchange. And mostly they answered "will not be listed yet due to current market condition" and I don't buy it. Some developers are being to shy or hesitant to say the truth that they don't have enough money and the ICO wasn't that successful. And salute to other projects even though they don't also collect enough funds, they are honest to the investors and bounty hunters.

[Insert_]

of course, this upsets many participants, everyone is looking forward to the listing, but I believe that some projects are not in a hurry to go to the stock exchange themselves.

[TastyChillySauce00]

Now almost all the projects carry lists and do what I think is right. Those projects that went on the stock exchange lost 80-90% of the cost. It is better to wait until the market stops falling and stabilizes.

This mainly happened to those overrated coins that actually have zero utilities but people are still buying it anyway. If the coin is really useful it won't lose its value that easily regardless of the bearish market.
However,ICOs that can't reach cap usually lost its value in an instant though.

[iconoclast]

It shows a lack of faith in your project. Choosing not to list because of market conditions is an indication that you think the only way your token can do well is during times of irrational exuberance. Hate to be the bearer of bad new but 2017 is never coming back. What you see now is the new normal and it is not in any hurry to change from here.

[MelodyCrypto]

in my opinion delaying listings on the exchange due bear market conditions maybe only their reasons
even though they have enough funds to pay exchange listing fee but there is no guarantee they can be accepted because each exchange has a different provision
for example is Bittrex, they don't want to listing an equity-based platform that doesn't have a good product that can make the token value grow (just highlight on the revenue sharing system to users)

[Wale777]

The current trend whereby ICOs delay exchange and every other plans as it is clearly outlined on the roadmap is a cheap excuse by some unserious devs capitalising on the bearish market and because of that keeps extending ICOs which is needless if their ideas are genuine and can compete in the market.. If the project is good it can list on exchange and investors will still buy because in the long run the coin will grow as long as implementation is taking with utmost importance, some coin dump because the team abandon their projects

[bitvalak]

In this thread I will never offend or discriminate against a crypto project, if one of the crypto projects goes the same way as in this thread, well Im so sorry

I feel sorry for the past few months that many ICO investors and bounty hunters have had problems with the crypto projects they support. This is related to the distribution of tokens and listed in the exchange which is always postponed due to bear market problems, of course in my opinion that is the reason that is only made to increase popularity because it is increasingly blasphemed with so many people who are interested and curious (one of the marketing techniques which is weird but believe me its work)

But what I have noticed here is the reason for the bear market, well, they assume that if they force it to be able to listing as soon as possible, then what happens is a massive dump and will never be able to rise. This is strange, none of the crypto currency does not experience a dump.

Of course this is a strange reason if the developer is a professional in the world of economics and crypto, why? Because many new altcoins are listing in the exchange, they experience a dump but manage to rise again.

Reasons to avoid losses on the part of investors, really? Investor loss or loss from the Developer? I'm not sure they think of investors and bounty participants, how do you think about the project problem like this?

I agree with you, most new projects are afraid of dumps, whatever their reasons why they are afraid of it. Even if we think of logic, coins or any tokens I can be in a dumper at any time. Without wanting to offend other parties, I don't think they care about the discussion in this forum, because basically they use this forum only for promotional events, not for discussion.

[Micerker]

In this thread I will never offend or discriminate against a crypto project, if one of the crypto projects goes the same way as in this thread, well Im so sorry

I feel sorry for the past few months that many ICO investors and bounty hunters have had problems with the crypto projects they support. This is related to the distribution of tokens and listed in the exchange which is always postponed due to bear market problems, of course in my opinion that is the reason that is only made to increase popularity because it is increasingly blasphemed with so many people who are interested and curious (one of the marketing techniques which is weird but believe me its work)

But what I have noticed here is the reason for the bear market, well, they assume that if they force it to be able to listing as soon as possible, then what happens is a massive dump and will never be able to rise. This is strange, none of the crypto currency does not experience a dump.

Of course this is a strange reason if the developer is a professional in the world of economics and crypto, why? Because many new altcoins are listing in the exchange, they experience a dump but manage to rise again.

Reasons to avoid losses on the part of investors, really? Investor loss or loss from the Developer? I'm not sure they think of investors and bounty participants, how do you think about the project problem like this?

Many projects have delayed listing on exchanges at this time as a right decision because they know that investors who may be trying to sell their tokens will cause the project to fall into disrepair. Due to insufficient liquidity, delaying listing on exchanges will be the right decision.