Bitcoin Forum
April 24, 2024, 11:16:11 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: AMD R9 290X?  (Read 108744 times)
Samir_H
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 83
Merit: 10


View Profile
October 30, 2013, 02:32:49 PM
Last edit: October 30, 2013, 05:13:41 PM by Samir_H
 #161

It's readily available...

I suggest waiting for the r9 290, should draw less power and be slightly slower, whilst costing $100 less.

Any idea when they launch this card? I always though they launch it together with R9 290x...

Last info 5th november.

http://www.techpowerup.com/193497/radeon-r9-290-non-x-launch-pushed-back-a-week.html
1713957371
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713957371

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713957371
Reply with quote  #2

1713957371
Report to moderator
1713957371
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713957371

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713957371
Reply with quote  #2

1713957371
Report to moderator
There are several different types of Bitcoin clients. The most secure are full nodes like Bitcoin Core, but full nodes are more resource-heavy, and they must do a lengthy initial syncing process. As a result, lightweight clients with somewhat less security are commonly used.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1713957371
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713957371

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713957371
Reply with quote  #2

1713957371
Report to moderator
1713957371
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713957371

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713957371
Reply with quote  #2

1713957371
Report to moderator
SquallLeonhart
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2324
Merit: 1101


View Profile
October 30, 2013, 02:35:40 PM
 #162


Thanks for sharing, was waiting for an answer before this...
Noruka
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 910
Merit: 253


View Profile
October 30, 2013, 05:53:41 PM
 #163

I guess people didn't notice me emphasising bitcoin in my comment.

i think people just assume you weren't talking about wanting to go back to GPU mining of bitcoins.
forevernoob
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 687
Merit: 500



View Profile
October 30, 2013, 09:20:42 PM
 #164

Yeah why the hell would you wanna mine bitcoins with your GPU anyway?
Current difficulty is just too high.

RandomQ
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 826
Merit: 500



View Profile
October 31, 2013, 04:08:31 AM
 #165


Thanks for sharing, looks like I will pass until the price of the GPU drop..

I got a 280X and I'm able to get ~740KH/s @ 1100/1500, I love this card and I want to order 10 more!
Running @80C at maybe 30DB, its almost silent.


I really want to get a 270 and see if I can get 700KH/s, because its almost 100 USD cheaper
ivanlabrie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 812
Merit: 1000



View Profile
October 31, 2013, 04:29:18 AM
 #166


Thanks for sharing, looks like I will pass until the price of the GPU drop..

I got a 280X and I'm able to get ~740KH/s @ 1100/1500, I love this card and I want to order 10 more!
Running @80C at maybe 30DB, its almost silent.


I really want to get a 270 and see if I can get 700KH/s, because its almost 100 USD cheaper

270x is a 7870 ghz card...you won't get more than 350-400 with it.

280X is a 7970.
RandomQ
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 826
Merit: 500



View Profile
October 31, 2013, 04:41:57 AM
 #167

Some power consumption numbers

6 Core AMD CPU
SSD drive
Watercooled GPU and 1 80mm fan
2 monitors hooked up

167 Watts at idle
415 Watts @761Kh/s @1085/1500

Wipeout2097
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 840
Merit: 255


SportsIcon - Connect With Your Sports Heroes


View Profile
October 31, 2013, 04:47:43 AM
 #168

The card as it is now ($550, 300W, 95ºC, stock cooler) is a bad deal for mining. Better get 7990, 7950 or 280x

███████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
██▀       ▀█       ▀████████████        ▀█         █▀       ▀██
██   ▀██▄▄▄█   ██   ████████████   ███   ████   ████   ▀██▄▄▄██
███▄     ▀██       ▄████████████       ▄█████   █████▄     ▀███
██▀▀▀██▄   █   █████████████████   █▄  ▀█████   ████▀▀▀██▄   ██
██▄       ▄█   █████████████████   ██▄  ▀████   ████▄       ▄██
███████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
██       ██▀      ▀█████████████    ▀██   █████████████████████
████   ███   ▄██▄   ████████████     ▀█   █████████████████████
████   ███   ████████   ████   █   ▄  ▀   █████████████████████
████   ███   ▀██▀   █   ████   █   █▄     █████████████████████
██       ██▄      ▄███        ██   ██▄    █████████████████████
███████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
██████████████
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██████████████
████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████                                                             ████████████████████████████████████████████████
.
.
.

████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████          ████████████████                                 ██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
██████████████
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██████████████
███████
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
███████
███████
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
███████
►►  Powered by
BOUNTY
DETECTIVE
ivanlabrie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 812
Merit: 1000



View Profile
October 31, 2013, 05:30:25 AM
 #169

The card as it is now ($550, 300W, 95ºC, stock cooler) is a bad deal for mining. Better get 7990, 7950 or 280x

Who said it's bad that it runs at 95c? It's a safe temp for those chips...
As far as power draw, the guy who posted results reported 270w+- for 900kh/s, which is pretty decent imho.
The 290 non x should draw even less power and run cooler since it sports less SPs, and will probably overclock more. If you undervolt a bit you should be set with a par of em, at 400usd.
Samir_H
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 83
Merit: 10


View Profile
October 31, 2013, 09:42:00 AM
 #170

I read somewhere about flashing 290 with 290X bios, that could be interesting if it's possible...
l3jmr
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 99
Merit: 10


View Profile
October 31, 2013, 10:43:59 AM
 #171

I read somewhere about flashing 290 with 290X bios, that could be interesting if it's possible...
That's probably just pure speculation...how can someone know that already Cheesy It could happen tho, we have seen it in the past. R9800->R9800 pro or 6950->6970 comes to mind.

⚫ ⚫ ⚫  Listen to the weekly altcoinsidekick.com podcast to understand what cryptocurrency is really all about.  ⚫ ⚫ ⚫
AltcoinSidekick.com - CRYPTO Blog | Podcasts | Videos | Tools  ▬▬▬ ■
ivanlabrie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 812
Merit: 1000



View Profile
October 31, 2013, 10:52:27 AM
 #172

I read somewhere about flashing 290 with 290X bios, that could be interesting if it's possible...
That's probably just pure speculation...how can someone know that already Cheesy It could happen tho, we have seen it in the past. R9800->R9800 pro or 6950->6970 comes to mind.

I guess AMD learned from those mistakes...
Klubknuckle
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 285
Merit: 250


View Profile
October 31, 2013, 12:29:40 PM
 #173

The card as it is now ($550, 300W, 95ºC, stock cooler) is a bad deal for mining. Better get 7990, 7950 or 280x

Who said it's bad that it runs at 95c? It's a safe temp for those chips...
As far as power draw, the guy who posted results reported 270w+- for 900kh/s, which is pretty decent imho.
The 290 non x should draw even less power and run cooler since it sports less SPs, and will probably overclock more. If you undervolt a bit you should be set with a par of em, at 400usd.

Wow, 270w is really good for that hash. Might get few if Alt-coin price go up...

Radelderth
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 202
Merit: 100


View Profile
November 01, 2013, 12:50:40 AM
 #174

I read somewhere about flashing 290 with 290X bios, that could be interesting if it's possible...

Are they using the same chips?

ivanlabrie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 812
Merit: 1000



View Profile
November 01, 2013, 01:17:53 AM
 #175

I read somewhere about flashing 290 with 290X bios, that could be interesting if it's possible...

Are they using the same chips?

Not the same chip, laser cut probably...AMD won't make the same mistake again.
coin@coin
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1722
Merit: 1000



View Profile
November 01, 2013, 01:42:55 AM
 #176


Thanks for sharing, looks like I will pass until the price of the GPU drop..

I got a 280X and I'm able to get ~740KH/s @ 1100/1500, I love this card and I want to order 10 more!
Running @80C at maybe 30DB, its almost silent.


I really want to get a 270 and see if I can get 700KH/s, because its almost 100 USD cheaper

Which one did you get?

I tried MSI TwinFroz OC Gaming (which failed after a week of mining) and HIS IceQ X2 Boost. Both freshly released 280X.

- MSI was silent and performed around 700KH/s at stock 1000/1500 with temp 80/81 C, really like this card, compact
- IceQ same performance at 1000/1500, silent but at a max of 68/71 C (+1 from me), only thing it's huge at 31cm length, but solid and hopefully long lasting

Haven't overclocked nor undervolted yet but if anyone could post their CGMiner settings for the same kinda cards maybe of help, I'm sure I can squeeze a little more out of them. I use

Code:
-I 13 -g 2 -w 256 --shaders 2048

Looking forward to see price and availability of 290 and 280 non X versions but as per the 290X it's a nono cos of the noise that thing makes!
JessicaSe
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 840
Merit: 1000



View Profile
November 01, 2013, 01:52:28 AM
 #177

The card as it is now ($550, 300W, 95ºC, stock cooler) is a bad deal for mining. Better get 7990, 7950 or 280x

Where did you see 95C? I don't think with nice settings it would go that high right?
pontiacg5
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 364
Merit: 250



View Profile
November 01, 2013, 01:59:15 AM
 #178


Thanks for sharing, looks like I will pass until the price of the GPU drop..

I got a 280X and I'm able to get ~740KH/s @ 1100/1500, I love this card and I want to order 10 more!
Running @80C at maybe 30DB, its almost silent.


I really want to get a 270 and see if I can get 700KH/s, because its almost 100 USD cheaper

Which one did you get?

I tried MSI TwinFroz OC Gaming (which failed after a week of mining) and HIS IceQ X2 Boost. Both freshly released 280X.

- MSI was silent and performed around 700KH/s at stock 1000/1500 with temp 80/81 C, really like this card, compact
- IceQ same performance at 1000/1500, silent but at a max of 68/71 C (+1 from me), only thing it's huge at 31cm length, but solid and hopefully long lasting

Haven't overclocked nor undervolted yet but if anyone could post their CGMiner settings for the same kinda cards maybe of help, I'm sure I can squeeze a little more out of them. I use

Code:
-I 13 -g 2 -w 256 --shaders 2048

Looking forward to see price and availability of 290 and 280 non X versions but as per the 290X it's a nono cos of the noise that thing makes!

I have two sapphire dual-x 280x cards, both manage right around 750kh/s with these settings.

-setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
-setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
cgminer --scrypt -o stratum+tcp:// -u  -p  -I 13 --shaders 2048 --thread-concurrency 8192 --worksize 256 -g 2 --lookup-gap 2 --gpu-engine 1080 --gpu-memclock 1500


Please DO NOT send me private messages asking for help setting up GPU miners. I will not respond!!!
Wipeout2097
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 840
Merit: 255


SportsIcon - Connect With Your Sports Heroes


View Profile
November 01, 2013, 03:22:47 AM
 #179

Who said it's bad that it runs at 95c? It's a safe temp for those chips...
otoh, who said it is safe? The company releasing a card with crappy cooler and wants to sell hardware? It's up to the end user to determine if he wants to keep at 95ºC a piece of hardware that costs him $550.
Quote
As far as power draw, the guy who posted results reported 270w+- for 900kh/s, which is pretty decent imho.
900 Kh/s at 270w is indeed decent. What is not is getting 900 Kh/s at 270W after paying $550. Compare with getting 750 Kh/s at $275 and ~180W out of the 280x or 650 Kh/s for $200 out of the 7950.

███████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
██▀       ▀█       ▀████████████        ▀█         █▀       ▀██
██   ▀██▄▄▄█   ██   ████████████   ███   ████   ████   ▀██▄▄▄██
███▄     ▀██       ▄████████████       ▄█████   █████▄     ▀███
██▀▀▀██▄   █   █████████████████   █▄  ▀█████   ████▀▀▀██▄   ██
██▄       ▄█   █████████████████   ██▄  ▀████   ████▄       ▄██
███████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
██       ██▀      ▀█████████████    ▀██   █████████████████████
████   ███   ▄██▄   ████████████     ▀█   █████████████████████
████   ███   ████████   ████   █   ▄  ▀   █████████████████████
████   ███   ▀██▀   █   ████   █   █▄     █████████████████████
██       ██▄      ▄███        ██   ██▄    █████████████████████
███████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
██████████████
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██████████████
████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████                                                             ████████████████████████████████████████████████
.
.
.

████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████          ████████████████                                 ██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
██████████████
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██████████████
███████
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
███████
███████
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
███████
►►  Powered by
BOUNTY
DETECTIVE
Golph
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 153
Merit: 100


View Profile
November 01, 2013, 03:53:03 AM
 #180


Thanks for sharing, looks like I will pass until the price of the GPU drop..

I got a 280X and I'm able to get ~740KH/s @ 1100/1500, I love this card and I want to order 10 more!
Running @80C at maybe 30DB, its almost silent.


I really want to get a 270 and see if I can get 700KH/s, because its almost 100 USD cheaper

Which one did you get?

I tried MSI TwinFroz OC Gaming (which failed after a week of mining) and HIS IceQ X2 Boost. Both freshly released 280X.

- MSI was silent and performed around 700KH/s at stock 1000/1500 with temp 80/81 C, really like this card, compact
- IceQ same performance at 1000/1500, silent but at a max of 68/71 C (+1 from me), only thing it's huge at 31cm length, but solid and hopefully long lasting

Haven't overclocked nor undervolted yet but if anyone could post their CGMiner settings for the same kinda cards maybe of help, I'm sure I can squeeze a little more out of them. I use

Code:
-I 13 -g 2 -w 256 --shaders 2048

Looking forward to see price and availability of 290 and 280 non X versions but as per the 290X it's a nono cos of the noise that thing makes!

I have two sapphire dual-x 280x cards, both manage right around 750kh/s with these settings.

-setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
-setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
cgminer --scrypt -o stratum+tcp:// -u  -p  -I 13 --shaders 2048 --thread-concurrency 8192 --worksize 256 -g 2 --lookup-gap 2 --gpu-engine 1080 --gpu-memclock 1500



Nice, and do you have to have a have a watt tester?

Get Daily Free SIGNs before too late. SyeED5YaZeVPows6Zx9z1hJ7twNJrKLrJB
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!