Bitcoin Forum
March 28, 2024, 10:06:18 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 26.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 [161] 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 ... 294 »
  Print  
Author Topic: HoboNickels - HBN - High Fast Stake - Version 2.0! More Secure, Less Intensive  (Read 478540 times)
cryptmebro
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 786
Merit: 1000


View Profile
September 25, 2015, 04:45:35 AM
 #3201


My dick is rock hard now
1711620378
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1711620378

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1711620378
Reply with quote  #2

1711620378
Report to moderator
Once a transaction has 6 confirmations, it is extremely unlikely that an attacker without at least 50% of the network's computation power would be able to reverse it.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1711620378
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1711620378

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1711620378
Reply with quote  #2

1711620378
Report to moderator
1711620378
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1711620378

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1711620378
Reply with quote  #2

1711620378
Report to moderator
HCLivess
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2114
Merit: 1090


=== NODE IS OK! ==


View Profile WWW
September 25, 2015, 07:29:50 AM
 #3202

If this is true http://www.coindesk.com/world-economic-forum-governments-blockchain/
Then HBN is one of the best investments for years to come

HCLivess
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2114
Merit: 1090


=== NODE IS OK! ==


View Profile WWW
September 25, 2015, 07:36:15 AM
 #3203

is cryptsy the only exchange place ?

We got delisted from c-cex? Lol
HBN was 10th most traded coin on cryptsy just recently. Exchanges these days...

Tranz (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1540
Merit: 1052


May the force bit with you.


View Profile
September 26, 2015, 01:18:05 AM
 #3204

I would like to hear what Tranz has to say.

I have thought about this(coin swap) for about 1/10 of a second. Not a good idea for so many reasons.

Instead I think we can begin to shrink the memory and CPU usage to be a little bit more reasonable. BTC for me can use anywhere from 1.5 gigs to 300megs of memory, it tends to come and go.  If we can isolate the memory changes for the block chain and the wallet it could help out.   Also there have been some helpful changes to the staking algo curtsy of pressTab in HYP. I think we can utilize some this as well.

Just need the thing more precious then crypto, money or much else... TIME......

HBN: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=303749.0 hobonickels.info
Personal Donations: F1TranzWqFGZyFeTMu6iLbtTQgdXuJPsiL
Donations to the HBN Fund: EhbNfund4PrRFLHMxsnbGLhP25hizJGHEE or 1LVFtCX4a83dMLjd8S7imKKKC58QaG83kw
kiklo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000



View Profile
September 26, 2015, 06:00:05 AM
 #3205

Two Different Possible ideas to remove blockchain bloat in the future.

Understandable implementation would be way way in the future.

But here they are
1. http://cryptonite.info/wiki/index.php?title=Mini-blockchain_scheme
(Not sure if this one is even possible for a PoS coin)

2. Running Genesis Block Theory
If I understand this, it would have to be set up so that it would be created every so many blocks... Like every 1-million blocks. So when the 1,000,001 block arrives it has code that automatically pulls in the information required. Then after 1,000 more blocks go by, the 1,000,001 block becomes block 1.
What you would do is parse all the addresses of the current chain in a snapshot, then a new genesis Block would be created with 100% premine and all the Coins sent to the addresses of the previous chain. You guys should talk to SuperClam from CLAMS, he would be able to give you a better idea about it but you will need to look into the znort Blockparser https://github.com/znort987/blockparser and the sidecoin project https://github.com/AugurProject/sidecoin


 Cool

FYI:
Credit to Crestington for refining the idea with the blockparser info.
niktitan132
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1036
Merit: 1000



View Profile
September 26, 2015, 07:26:43 AM
 #3206

Deposit on cryptsy not working?I click generate new hbn adress,and get error,please try again Huh Huh
presstab
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000


Blockchain Developer


View Profile
September 26, 2015, 05:59:19 PM
 #3207

I would like to hear what Tranz has to say.

I have thought about this(coin swap) for about 1/10 of a second. Not a good idea for so many reasons.

Instead I think we can begin to shrink the memory and CPU usage to be a little bit more reasonable. BTC for me can use anywhere from 1.5 gigs to 300megs of memory, it tends to come and go.  If we can isolate the memory changes for the block chain and the wallet it could help out.   Also there have been some helpful changes to the staking algo curtsy of pressTab in HYP. I think we can utilize some this as well.

Just need the thing more precious then crypto, money or much else... TIME......

From what I understand, one of the primary causes of the high RAM usage in these larger/older chains is that the unspent outputs are stored in RAM. I wonder if it would be worthwhile to tweak the code so that perhaps only the last 6 months worth of outputs are stored in the ram and the rest stored on disk, or something like that? I wonder what bitcoin has done in this regard.

Projects I Contribute To: libzerocoin | Veil | PIVX | HyperStake | Crown | SaluS
forzendiablo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1526
Merit: 1000


the grandpa of cryptos


View Profile
September 27, 2015, 04:13:18 AM
 #3208

Deposit on cryptsy not working?I click generate new hbn adress,and get error,please try again Huh Huh


to mek it works just fine. sold some HBN now

yolo
kiklo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000



View Profile
September 27, 2015, 06:26:36 AM
 #3209

I would like to hear what Tranz has to say.

I have thought about this(coin swap) for about 1/10 of a second. Not a good idea for so many reasons.

Instead I think we can begin to shrink the memory and CPU usage to be a little bit more reasonable. BTC for me can use anywhere from 1.5 gigs to 300megs of memory, it tends to come and go.  If we can isolate the memory changes for the block chain and the wallet it could help out.   Also there have been some helpful changes to the staking algo curtsy of pressTab in HYP. I think we can utilize some this as well.

Just need the thing more precious then crypto, money or much else... TIME......

From what I understand, one of the primary causes of the high RAM usage in these larger/older chains is that the unspent outputs are stored in RAM. I wonder if it would be worthwhile to tweak the code so that perhaps only the last 6 months worth of outputs are stored in the ram and the rest stored on disk, or something like that? I wonder what bitcoin has done in this regard.

This is from a Monero reference:
https://bitcointa.lk/threads/ann-mro-monero-a-coin-with-strong-privacy-based-on-cryptonote-technology.304375/page-887

In the original cryptonote reference implementation the whole blockchain is stored in RAM. Bitcoin and Bitcoin-clone coins store it on disk, in a database. As time goes on and it gets larger, having it all in RAM becomes more of a problem.
We have implemented the ability to store the blockchain in a database instead of RAM and LMDB is an open source database package we are using for the first implementation.
tldr: very reduced memory usage


I believe this is the company they are talking about:
Symas Lightning Memory-Mapped Database (LMDB)
http://symas.com/mdb/

 Cool
mind808crime
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 203
Merit: 100


View Profile
September 28, 2015, 01:25:13 AM
 #3210

Dumb question but a don't see a posting for this.  Does the bootstrap go into apps/roaming and if so why does it freeze?
jasonhopper2412
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 107
Merit: 10


View Profile
September 28, 2015, 01:28:56 AM
 #3211

Dumb question but a don't see a posting for this.  Does the bootstrap go into apps/roaming and if so why does it freeze?
Ha thanks man! I was just about to ask this same question. ;-)

Pay me to advertise here suckas.....
Biomech
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1372
Merit: 1022


Anarchy is not chaos.


View Profile
September 28, 2015, 02:04:51 AM
 #3212

Dumb question but a don't see a posting for this.  Does the bootstrap go into apps/roaming and if so why does it freeze?

It goes in the data directory, which would be .hobonickels in linux, appdata/roaming/hobonickels in windows, and I'm not sure what it is in OSX. It will appear to freeze for a while, it's actually indexing. I've never bootstrapped hobonickels, but expect a few hours to get in sync with a bootstrap on pretty much any coin.
jasonhopper2412
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 107
Merit: 10


View Profile
September 28, 2015, 02:11:57 AM
 #3213

Dumb question but a don't see a posting for this.  Does the bootstrap go into apps/roaming and if so why does it freeze?

It goes in the data directory, which would be .hobonickels in linux, appdata/roaming/hobonickels in windows, and I'm not sure what it is in OSX. It will appear to freeze for a while, it's actually indexing. I've never bootstrapped hobonickels, but expect a few hours to get in sync with a bootstrap on pretty much any coin.
Ah OK. I did do it correctly and it was simply loading a long time and not froze. Thanks man.

Pay me to advertise here suckas.....
presstab
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000


Blockchain Developer


View Profile
September 28, 2015, 02:29:58 AM
 #3214

I would like to hear what Tranz has to say.

I have thought about this(coin swap) for about 1/10 of a second. Not a good idea for so many reasons.

Instead I think we can begin to shrink the memory and CPU usage to be a little bit more reasonable. BTC for me can use anywhere from 1.5 gigs to 300megs of memory, it tends to come and go.  If we can isolate the memory changes for the block chain and the wallet it could help out.   Also there have been some helpful changes to the staking algo curtsy of pressTab in HYP. I think we can utilize some this as well.

Just need the thing more precious then crypto, money or much else... TIME......

From what I understand, one of the primary causes of the high RAM usage in these larger/older chains is that the unspent outputs are stored in RAM. I wonder if it would be worthwhile to tweak the code so that perhaps only the last 6 months worth of outputs are stored in the ram and the rest stored on disk, or something like that? I wonder what bitcoin has done in this regard.

This is from a Monero reference:
https://bitcointa.lk/threads/ann-mro-monero-a-coin-with-strong-privacy-based-on-cryptonote-technology.304375/page-887

In the original cryptonote reference implementation the whole blockchain is stored in RAM. Bitcoin and Bitcoin-clone coins store it on disk, in a database. As time goes on and it gets larger, having it all in RAM becomes more of a problem.
We have implemented the ability to store the blockchain in a database instead of RAM and LMDB is an open source database package we are using for the first implementation.
tldr: very reduced memory usage


I believe this is the company they are talking about:
Symas Lightning Memory-Mapped Database (LMDB)
http://symas.com/mdb/

 Cool

Im talking about the utxo mempool not the blockchain itself.

Projects I Contribute To: libzerocoin | Veil | PIVX | HyperStake | Crown | SaluS
kiklo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000



View Profile
September 28, 2015, 05:53:19 AM
 #3215

Im talking about the utxo mempool not the blockchain itself.
Sorry,
my bad.

 Cool
HCLivess
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2114
Merit: 1090


=== NODE IS OK! ==


View Profile WWW
September 29, 2015, 08:01:27 AM
 #3216

I would like to hear what Tranz has to say.

I have thought about this(coin swap) for about 1/10 of a second. Not a good idea for so many reasons.

Instead I think we can begin to shrink the memory and CPU usage to be a little bit more reasonable. BTC for me can use anywhere from 1.5 gigs to 300megs of memory, it tends to come and go.  If we can isolate the memory changes for the block chain and the wallet it could help out.   Also there have been some helpful changes to the staking algo curtsy of pressTab in HYP. I think we can utilize some this as well.

Just need the thing more precious then crypto, money or much else... TIME......

From what I understand, one of the primary causes of the high RAM usage in these larger/older chains is that the unspent outputs are stored in RAM. I wonder if it would be worthwhile to tweak the code so that perhaps only the last 6 months worth of outputs are stored in the ram and the rest stored on disk, or something like that? I wonder what bitcoin has done in this regard.

This is from a Monero reference:
https://bitcointa.lk/threads/ann-mro-monero-a-coin-with-strong-privacy-based-on-cryptonote-technology.304375/page-887

In the original cryptonote reference implementation the whole blockchain is stored in RAM. Bitcoin and Bitcoin-clone coins store it on disk, in a database. As time goes on and it gets larger, having it all in RAM becomes more of a problem.
We have implemented the ability to store the blockchain in a database instead of RAM and LMDB is an open source database package we are using for the first implementation.
tldr: very reduced memory usage


I believe this is the company they are talking about:
Symas Lightning Memory-Mapped Database (LMDB)
http://symas.com/mdb/

 Cool

Im talking about the utxo mempool not the blockchain itself.

codebase is different here, implementation of btc-based solutions would be easier

B3dr0ck
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 154
Merit: 10


View Profile
September 30, 2015, 04:23:04 PM
 #3217

Wallet is displaying

WARNING: Checkpoint is too old.  Wait for block chain to download, or notify developers.

What is this, and what needs to be done?
vancefox
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1033
Merit: 1005



View Profile
September 30, 2015, 11:44:55 PM
 #3218



Over 1GB now...  I know a solution is being pondered, but this one wallet takes over 1/16 of my memory now... and growing.

This space not for rent...
vancefox
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1033
Merit: 1005



View Profile
September 30, 2015, 11:47:31 PM
 #3219

Wallet is displaying

WARNING: Checkpoint is too old.  Wait for block chain to download, or notify developers.

What is this, and what needs to be done?

The checkpoint notice itself is not a problem.  With that said:

Verify you have the correct and most up to date wallet.  Verify you're on the correct and most up to date chain (highest block should help with this).

Follow OP on page 1 for the wallet download if not.  Do not download any wallets in replies or not posted by the dev.

Worst case scenario, resync the blockchain.  But only do this is you see an adverse effect.

This space not for rent...
B3dr0ck
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 154
Merit: 10


View Profile
October 01, 2015, 02:54:08 AM
 #3220

QT version 5.2.0 - that the latest?

How can I tell what Blockchain I'm on?
Pages: « 1 ... 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 [161] 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 ... 294 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!