Tranz (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1052
May the force bit with you.
|
|
April 09, 2014, 02:30:17 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You get merit points when someone likes your post enough to give you some. And for every 2 merit points you receive, you can send 1 merit point to someone else!
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
unick
|
|
April 09, 2014, 06:34:32 AM |
|
Mac Wallet is also updated with OpenSSL 1.0.1g. get the download link from the discussion link above
|
|
|
|
Majormax
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2534
Merit: 1129
|
|
April 09, 2014, 11:38:00 AM |
|
I have that up and running now , staking well ! One comment: The Coin Control time seems to be in UTC , whereas Transaction times are set to local clock. Is that a deliberate feature ?
|
|
|
|
solarion
|
|
April 09, 2014, 11:39:06 AM |
|
Thanks guys. It's comforting to see such great support from the hbn devs.
|
|
|
|
Oto3
Member
Offline
Activity: 195
Merit: 10
|
|
April 09, 2014, 11:55:51 AM |
|
1.4 running fine. I just wish the startup time was faster. Loading block index takes forever.
|
|
|
|
Majormax
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2534
Merit: 1129
|
|
April 09, 2014, 12:01:23 PM |
|
1.4 running fine. I just wish the startup time was faster. Loading block index takes forever.
All PoS coins are slow startups. HBN has a lot of extra wallet features,and that is worth the wait. Moral here : Shut the wallet down less often: leave it running as much as possible.
|
|
|
|
z0rr0
|
|
April 09, 2014, 02:41:56 PM |
|
1.4 running fine too, and I think the start of the client was a bit faster then with 1.3.1 (or may be I'm just want it so ) Love all the new things, these buttons and the full info by getmininginfo command.
|
|
|
|
presstab
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000
Blockchain Developer
|
|
April 09, 2014, 02:55:52 PM |
|
1.4 running fine. I just wish the startup time was faster. Loading block index takes forever.
Not really a great way to fix this yet unless a new wallet is made that doesn't have to load the block chain. 30 second blocks makes the chain grow quickly. Indexing the chain can take some time.
|
|
|
|
alibabacool
|
|
April 09, 2014, 03:37:43 PM |
|
Hi Tranz! Thanks for update! Works great.
|
|
|
|
z0rr0
|
|
April 09, 2014, 05:20:59 PM |
|
I've made a quick calculation using http://hbn.blockx.info block explorer with data just for 1 hour of HBN blockchain live, and got the result of 93 PoS and 45 PoW blocks per hour, nice 2/1 relation. Of course it needs far more data to analysis, but still interesting picture I think. Edit: what a huge spike of PoS diff https://scrypt.io/graphs/hbninfo_posdiff-week.png
|
|
|
|
presstab
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000
Blockchain Developer
|
|
April 09, 2014, 06:44:18 PM |
|
I've made a quick calculation using http://hbn.blockx.info block explorer with data just for 1 hour of HBN blockchain live, and got the result of 93 PoS and 45 PoW blocks per hour, nice 2/1 relation. Of course it needs far more data to analysis, but still interesting picture I think. Edit: what a huge spike of PoS diff https://scrypt.io/graphs/hbninfo_posdiff-week.pngInteresting... Also seeing the difference in average money supply added from PoS vs PoW would be interesting.
|
|
|
|
digital7
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 55
Merit: 0
|
|
April 09, 2014, 06:54:02 PM |
|
Great news and a big thank you to Tranz for taking the lead with HBN!
|
|
|
|
Tranz (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1052
May the force bit with you.
|
|
April 09, 2014, 09:27:20 PM |
|
1.4 running fine. I just wish the startup time was faster. Loading block index takes forever.
Yes I have been thinking of more ways to speed it up. Such as compiling with 64 bit(may help) and/or threading the init load. Difficulties arrise on both.
|
|
|
|
Oto3
Member
Offline
Activity: 195
Merit: 10
|
|
April 09, 2014, 09:41:10 PM |
|
1.4 running fine. I just wish the startup time was faster. Loading block index takes forever.
Yes I have been thinking of more ways to speed it up. Such as compiling with 64 bit(may help) and/or threading the init load. Difficulties arrise on both. Maybe consider adding progress bar. Users are more willing to wait if they know how long they have to wait.
|
|
|
|
scryptographer
|
|
April 09, 2014, 11:12:38 PM |
|
1.4 running fine. I just wish the startup time was faster. Loading block index takes forever.
Yes I have been thinking of more ways to speed it up. Such as compiling with 64 bit(may help) and/or threading the init load. Difficulties arrise on both. Perhaps take a look at what PHS is doing? One of the more recent updates to the PHS client lowered loading time significantly. For comparison PHS load time: 14s HBN load time: 281s
|
|
|
|
Tranz (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1052
May the force bit with you.
|
|
April 09, 2014, 11:34:23 PM |
|
1.4 running fine. I just wish the startup time was faster. Loading block index takes forever.
Yes I have been thinking of more ways to speed it up. Such as compiling with 64 bit(may help) and/or threading the init load. Difficulties arrise on both. Perhaps take a look at what PHS is doing? One of the more recent updates to the PHS client lowered loading time significantly. For comparison PHS load time: 14s HBN load time: 281s The code is very close, and comes from NVC's fast start. PHS is at block ~200,000, HBN is approaching 750,000. So PHS will also slow as time goes. However I will take another look at sometime and see if I missed something.
|
|
|
|
scryptographer
|
|
April 09, 2014, 11:46:29 PM |
|
1.4 running fine. I just wish the startup time was faster. Loading block index takes forever.
Yes I have been thinking of more ways to speed it up. Such as compiling with 64 bit(may help) and/or threading the init load. Difficulties arrise on both. Perhaps take a look at what PHS is doing? One of the more recent updates to the PHS client lowered loading time significantly. For comparison PHS load time: 14s HBN load time: 281s The code is very close, and comes from NVC's fast start. PHS is at block ~200,000, HBN is approaching 750,000. So PHS will also slow as time goes. However I will take another look at sometime and see if I missed something. Didn't think of the vast difference in block count. Appreciate all the work you put into this coin.
|
|
|
|
broken_pixel
|
|
April 10, 2014, 12:39:31 AM |
|
Thanks for the update Tranz, good stuff man.
|
GA-990FXA-UD5, 1x 7970L, 2x S1, AX1200i, RIVBE, 2x R290x, NEX1500, BTC: 1G9cQix8bMgh35MQ9wY3Rb9yNSSCtnoRmK, DGC: DFo9FcKYsutv9Vx5c5xUzkrt7VJdECZWTM, LTC: LaAN33aktPGaimN5ALL9kjHjuJekfmKfTh
|
|
|
Tranz (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1052
May the force bit with you.
|
|
April 10, 2014, 12:52:04 AM |
|
Acutally I just found the issue.
1 line.
READWRITE(blockHash);
I will be testing this over the next few days and then re-releasing 1.4.0.1. I think it might be it!
|
|
|
|
presstab
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000
Blockchain Developer
|
|
April 10, 2014, 01:44:06 AM |
|
Acutally I just found the issue.
1 line.
READWRITE(blockHash);
I will be testing this over the next few days and then re-releasing 1.4.0.1. I think it might be it!
Yes!!
|
|
|
|
|