AmaZix Team - BABB SCAMMERS (Amazix reviews).

[MrLitex]

Prehistory:
I started participating in the subscription bounty campaign of the BABB project (one of the Amazis Team projects) from January 27th and everything was fine until the moment when the bounty program ended. During the spreadsheet count, I noticed a dozen violations, recorded them, and reported to AmaZix Team. After that-I was blocked in both telegram groups of the BABB project. I wrote from another telegram account and the problem and I was again blocked. Well - I thought. I created a new telegram account and joined the group and then posted my complaint and I was not blocked, but simply excluded from the signature bounty program allegedly for "multiple account abuser , same as eth address and telegram username as 353". Surprising, given the fact that this account does not belong to me.
I wrote one of the, Huh, who blocked me still hoping to solve the problem peacefully and personally. But received only denial of, threats and not listening me.
Someone used my telegram username and my Ethereum wallet-to annoy me, apparently one of those who received a negative rating of trust because of my reports, which I quite often do (Look at Sent feedback -> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1082933)

Screenshots:

http://telegra.ph/file/8c93eb64ad98780bd12f3.png

http://telegra.ph/file/3dec7dd64849f5fef3f11.png


AmaZix violations in the subscription campaign-for which I was blocked:

User ALMAZ76 (#99) have negative trust - stakes were included (signature bounty).
"4. Users with negative trust will not be accepted"

User queennathalia (#19) not wearning - - stakes were included (signature bounty).
Proof: http://archive.li/ube9X

User Serco (#67) not wearning - - stakes were included (signature bounty).
Proof: http://www.freezepage.com/1519830047XEINPTMJKR

User Garant581 (#65) not wearning - - stakes were included (signature bounty).
Proof: http://www.freezepage.com/1519830065XCIQCLGSFL

User andi650 (#76) not wearning - - stakes were included (signature bounty).
Proof: http://www.freezepage.com/1519830080TRWEXQFBMG

User indo1 (#96) not wearning - - stakes were included (signature bounty).
Proof: http://www.freezepage.com/1519830154KVQGJOLXJR

User ainunfm (#91) not wearning - - stakes were included (signature bounty).
Proof: http://www.freezepage.com/1519830205CHHYHAOMAS

User cryptoholder2018 (#97) not wearning - - stakes were included (signature bounty).
Proof: http://www.freezepage.com/1519830269NUUJIYSFEN

User Renu kapoor (#105) not wearning - - stakes were included (signature bounty).
Proof: http://www.freezepage.com/1519830427MNRCBRQUVU

User vascrs11 (#114) not wearning - - stakes were included (signature bounty).
Proof: http://www.freezepage.com/1519830557SNVRAHLHDK

User decoder88 (#120) not wearning - - stakes were included (signature bounty).
Proof: http://www.freezepage.com/1519830658FJCHREVFQC

User Granslam (#125) not wearning - - stakes were included (signature bounty).
Proof: http://www.freezepage.com/1519830732DHCBHBOJQG

User neerajmittal (#133) not wearning - - stakes were included (signature bounty).
Proof: http://www.freezepage.com/1519830784KOUXOVTGWY

User HichemFetoui (#141) not wearning - - stakes were included (signature bounty).
Proof: http://www.freezepage.com/1519830862JUCECBHMWU

User Arabictranslators (#165) not wearning - - stakes were included (signature bounty).
Proof: http://www.freezepage.com/1519830990GJKNLCTMLX

User Nyenyepogi (#169) not wearning - - stakes were included (signature bounty).
Proof: http://www.freezepage.com/1519831063URCTCFTJDX

User Vermilion- (#196) not wearning - - stakes were included (signature bounty).
Proof: http://www.freezepage.com/1519831166USGNLKYQOZ

User judas (#270) not wearning - - stakes were included (signature bounty).
Proof: http://www.freezepage.com/1519831459ZHUVDMNPLK

User dogaatac (#268) not wearning - - stakes were included (signature bounty).
Proof: http://www.freezepage.com/1519831480ISKCVKXORC

User tuansemazi (#291) not wearning - - stakes were included (signature bounty).
Proof: http://www.freezepage.com/1519831545IUKCEEXVYO

User namistyk (#301) not wearning - - stakes were included (signature bounty).
Proof: http://www.freezepage.com/1519831606MCYEZENLFI

User thjnh0902 (#333) not wearning - - stakes were included (signature bounty).
Proof: http://www.freezepage.com/1519831720BKIQTMRWMY

User alpoahmo (#328) not wearning - - stakes were included (signature bounty).
Proof: http://www.freezepage.com/1519831755DUSEHDQDBP

User cool4y (#387) not wearning - - stakes were included (signature bounty).
Proof: http://www.freezepage.com/1519831942SMSFOGDEPR

User Alibaster (#393) not wearning - - stakes were included (signature bounty).
Proof: http://www.freezepage.com/1519832015ICJEFVLPWA

User dihan (#402) not wearning - - stakes were included (signature bounty).
Proof: http://www.freezepage.com/1519832067YHVRJDWWDD

User nxnqauff (#398) not wearning - - stakes were included (signature bounty).
Proof: http://www.freezepage.com/1519832104DLSQGGKHPU

User juiceannabel (#424) not wearning - - stakes were included (signature bounty).
Proof: http://www.freezepage.com/1519832214WRHXXLJSIY

User BountyGo (#423) not wearning - - stakes were included (signature bounty).
Proof: http://www.freezepage.com/1519832235OTJNOSEOZG

User jakfaronputra amin (#459) not wearning - - stakes were included (signature bounty).
Proof: http://www.freezepage.com/1519832335UPGZBTEDVH

User Dron Pelya (#499) not wearning - - stakes were included (signature bounty).
Proof: http://www.freezepage.com/1519832481XFJRZYDREL

I will correct my translation and Supplement this topic with new evidence of their fraud.

Russian thread:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3070451.msg31634810#msg31634810

[1715306737]

1715306737

[thehun]

Your excuse is very lame ("Someone used my telegram username and my Ethereum wallet-to annoy me", yeah right), you got caught and now you are throwing shit around and in denial.

All the people you list as "not wearing signature" removed it because at the date you took those captures we had already told them they could remove it (stakes were counted). So try better next time.

[MrLitex]

Your excuse is very lame ("Someone used my telegram username and my Ethereum wallet-to annoy me", yeah right), you got caught and now you are throwing shit around and in denial.

All the people you list as "not wearing signature" removed it because at the date you took those captures we had already told them they could remove it (stakes were counted). So try better next time.

There is no proof of this, except that any person could send the form and connect me even with Lauda or even Satoshi Nakamoto. The users had nothing to do with the BABB bounty. What is the logic of this fraud? Block yourself?
Try to justify your actions better next time..

[Shahrul09]

Hi there, let me get more info about this

One of the rules in bounty program participation is that you cant use multiple account to participate.
That is just abusing the bounty.
And as what i can see you also using a multiple telegram account

[Shahrul09]

[thehun]

Your excuse is very lame ("Someone used my telegram username and my Ethereum wallet-to annoy me", yeah right), you got caught and now you are throwing shit around and in denial.

All the people you list as "not wearing signature" removed it because at the date you took those captures we had already told them they could remove it (stakes were counted). So try better next time.

There is no proof of this, except that any person could send the form and connect me even with Lauda or even Satoshi Nakamoto. The users had nothing to do with the BABB bounty. What is the logic of this fraud? Block yourself?
Try to justify your actions better next time..

You must be a very bad person if you have so many enemies 

[MrLitex]

Thank you for duplicating the telegram message, but it is already posted in the first message.

[MrLitex]

Your excuse is very lame ("Someone used my telegram username and my Ethereum wallet-to annoy me", yeah right), you got caught and now you are throwing shit around and in denial.

All the people you list as "not wearing signature" removed it because at the date you took those captures we had already told them they could remove it (stakes were counted). So try better next time.

There is no proof of this, except that any person could send the form and connect me even with Lauda or even Satoshi Nakamoto. The users had nothing to do with the BABB bounty. What is the logic of this fraud? Block yourself?
Try to justify your actions better next time..

You must be a very bad person if you have so many enemies  

Because I sent a dozen complaints to a bunch of different people about what you were notified about:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1082933

And also I stand in the hate thread in the Russian-language topic on a par with Lauda, kiemnhieutien, killyou72, actmyname, johhnyUA, LoyceV, The Pharmacist, Lutpin:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2856805.0

[thehun]

Your excuse is very lame ("Someone used my telegram username and my Ethereum wallet-to annoy me", yeah right), you got caught and now you are throwing shit around and in denial.

All the people you list as "not wearing signature" removed it because at the date you took those captures we had already told them they could remove it (stakes were counted). So try better next time.

There is no proof of this, except that any person could send the form and connect me even with Lauda or even Satoshi Nakamoto. The users had nothing to do with the BABB bounty. What is the logic of this fraud? Block yourself?
Try to justify your actions better next time..

You must be a very bad person if you have so many enemies  

Because I sent a dozen complaints to a bunch of different people about what you were notified about:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1082933

And also I stand in the hate thread in the Russian-language topic on a par with Lauda, kiemnhieutien, killyou72, actmyname, johhnyUA, LoyceV, The Pharmacist, Lutpin:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2856805.0

So only others should be banned for using multiple accounts, not yourself? By reporting other people you expect to get a "get out of jail free" card?

[MrLitex]

Your excuse is very lame ("Someone used my telegram username and my Ethereum wallet-to annoy me", yeah right), you got caught and now you are throwing shit around and in denial.

All the people you list as "not wearing signature" removed it because at the date you took those captures we had already told them they could remove it (stakes were counted). So try better next time.

There is no proof of this, except that any person could send the form and connect me even with Lauda or even Satoshi Nakamoto. The users had nothing to do with the BABB bounty. What is the logic of this fraud? Block yourself?
Try to justify your actions better next time..

You must be a very bad person if you have so many enemies  

Because I sent a dozen complaints to a bunch of different people about what you were notified about:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1082933

And also I stand in the hate thread in the Russian-language topic on a par with Lauda, kiemnhieutien, killyou72, actmyname, johhnyUA, LoyceV, The Pharmacist, Lutpin:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2856805.0

So only others should be banned for using multiple accounts, not yourself? By reporting other people you expect to get a "get out of jail free" card?

Before you accuse me of anything - provide proof. In your forms there is no proof of authentication - anyone can use any other people's data with impunity and do mucks to people. As I said on this logic, I can connect you with anyone.

[bazar111]

In Russia we call such people the "six" =)

[Lauda]

OP is right with his statement that anyone can do this in order to sabotage you. Did this happen here? Possibly. Unless AmaZix has actual proof of OP being the owner of that other account[1], they are at fault here.
[1] Why would someone who is reporting others for account farming, use the same/similar method in order to farm in the same bounty? Use your head (@AmaZix team).
P.S. OP, you should prepare a list of AmaZix bitcointalk accounts.

[MrLitex]

Update!
I contacted the representative of BABB and describe the situation by attaching links.

Proof:



Additionally!
I wrote in the thread "Known Alts of any-one - A User Generated List Mk III (2018 Q1)" with a request to check my "connection" with johhnyUA.

Proof:

Hello! I actively post from time to time reports about multi-accounts (example Sent feedback: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1082933)
Amazix accused me of being a multi-account johhnyUA(https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=623643) (who is also involved in such activities, example: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2896910.msg31272972#msg31272972).

Please check me and his connection with us.

It would be very cool if someone could confirm the lack of connection between us in this topic:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3070391.msg31633850#msg31633850

[griffoninvest]

OP is right with his statement that anyone can do this in order to sabotage you. Did this happen here? Possibly. Unless AmaZix has actual proof of OP being the owner of that other account[1], they are at fault here.
[1] Why would someone who is reporting others for account farming, use the same/similar method in order to farm in the same bounty? Use your head (@AmaZix team).
P.S. OP, you should prepare a list of AmaZix bitcointalk accounts.

Hey

All my unique and readable articles were rejected. They paid for unavailable articles in the Medium.

This is very bad translation and his the author received an award.
https://steemit.com/babb/@margo123/ypnxm-babb

[Lauda]

Hey

All my unique and readable articles were rejected. They paid for unavailable articles in the Medium.

This is very bad translation and his the author received an award.
https://steemit.com/babb/@margo123/ypnxm-babb

Your case is only remotely related, and thus it should have a thread of its own. Summarize and present evidence in a new thread in this section: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=129.0. Don't forget this:

P.S. OP, you should prepare a list of AmaZix bitcointalk accounts.

Else we won't know who to tag.

[Shahrul09]

Update!
I contacted the representative of BABB and describe the situation by attaching links.

Proof:



Additionally!
I wrote in the thread "Known Alts of any-one - A User Generated List Mk III (2018 Q1)" with a request to check my "connection" with johhnyUA.

Proof:

Hello! I actively post from time to time reports about multi-accounts (example Sent feedback: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1082933)
Amazix accused me of being a multi-account johhnyUA(https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=623643) (who is also involved in such activities, example: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2896910.msg31272972#msg31272972).

Please check me and his connection with us.

It would be very cool if someone could confirm the lack of connection between us in this topic:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3070391.msg31633850#msg31633850

As what have been offered and written in your pm with one of our mod up there.

We putting you in a temporary banned period until we investigate the matter further into details

It is the basic stuff we did when we found user that using a multiple accounts in the spreadsheet.

But you instantaenously taking the matter into your own hand by opening a thread that try to defame us.

As what we said, we will investigate it, we can solve this nicely, but it will take time. So i dont think this thread even neccessary and putting up the heading ‘scammer’ is appropriate

[MrLitex]

Update!
I contacted the representative of BABB and describe the situation by attaching links.

Proof:



Additionally!
I wrote in the thread "Known Alts of any-one - A User Generated List Mk III (2018 Q1)" with a request to check my "connection" with johhnyUA.

Proof:

Hello! I actively post from time to time reports about multi-accounts (example Sent feedback: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1082933)
Amazix accused me of being a multi-account johhnyUA(https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=623643) (who is also involved in such activities, example: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2896910.msg31272972#msg31272972).

Please check me and his connection with us.

It would be very cool if someone could confirm the lack of connection between us in this topic:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3070391.msg31633850#msg31633850

As what have been offered and written in your pm with one of our mod up there.

We putting you in a temporary banned period until we investigate the matter further into details

It is the basic stuff we did when we found user that using a multiple accounts in the spreadsheet.

But you instantaenously taking the matter into your own hand by opening a thread that try to defame us.

As what we said, we will investigate it, we can solve this nicely, but it will take time. So i dont think this thread even neccessary and putting up the heading ‘scammer’ is appropriate

I will close this thread - if the problem is solved positively. At the moment, all your words do not correspond to reality.

[Lauda]

But you instantaenously taking the matter into your own hand by opening a thread that try to defame us.

Making nonsensical statements won't make OP look like they're shady; rather, it will make you guys look worse. A known tactic that no longer works, at least not with me.

So i dont think this thread even neccessary and putting up the heading ‘scammer’ is appropriate

If you unrightfully deny payment for the work that he/she did, then the heading is very much appropriate.

[Shahrul09]

But you instantaenously taking the matter into your own hand by opening a thread that try to defame us.

Making nonsensical statements won't make OP look like they're shady; rather, it will make you guys look worse. A known tactic that no longer works, at least not with me.

So i dont think this thread even neccessary and putting up the heading ‘scammer’ is appropriate

If you unrightfully deny payment for the work that he/she did, then the heading is very much appropriate.

Our bounty program have rules. One of it multiple account is not allowed.
Once this thing happen and we do have the screenshoot etc, we will put it onhold and investigate.
It just only happen few hours back. It takes time to check it in details.

And like you wrote up there.
There is a possibility user might use it to sabotage OP, but there is a possibility it isn't.

And the distribution for bounty is not begin yet until we close the complaint period.
This is not our first bounty program and we never reject any complaint. We will investigate it first
And fix the problem if deem necessary.

And if you want to call my statement as nonsensical. Feel free to do it.  
It wasnt nonsense as we offer it in the pm with him up there in the screenshot
 

[thehun]

Hey

All my unique and readable articles were rejected. They paid for unavailable articles in the Medium.

This is very bad translation and his the author received an award.
https://steemit.com/babb/@margo123/ypnxm-babb

Your case is only remotely related, and thus it should have a thread of its own. Summarize and present evidence in a new thread in this section: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=129.0. Don't forget this:

P.S. OP, you should prepare a list of AmaZix bitcointalk accounts.

Else we won't know who to tag.

I tend not to believe very much in conspiracy theories, but I will admit that you are right in that it is POSSIBLE (although in my opinion remotely) that it is how the OP says.

We see people submitting duplicate data (same Bitcointalk/Twitter/Facebook/Telegram account with all other data being different) to bounties all the time. I could give you dozens of examples. The usual procedure is to remove these people and carry on. Normally they get the hint and that's the end of the story.

As my colleague said we will investigate the matter further and come back with an answer very soon.

[MrLitex]

After creating the topic, publishing information and giving publicity to all this - Amazix recognized most likely that they were wrong and counted my shares, although unfortunately, at the moment, along with the person whom they have "linked" with me to this day we are in their black list.
I hope I'll disappear from there, or at least they will change the reason for "do not respect Amazix" - that was fair.
Also I hope they will remove from there a completely innocent person at all (johhnyUA)

Screenshot:


At the moment I will close this topic. After the reward for this campaign still goes to my wallet (I hope) I will rename this topic and ask the moderator to delete it.

P.S.
Many thanks to all those who were not indifferent and helped in solving this problem.