[ANN][BTCZ] BitcoinZ - zkSNARKs 21b max POW-Zhash No-Premine No-Dev Tax

[X3nd3r]

Here are the poll results. 20% of voters support the idea that the community should be represented by one person, elected in democratic way.
He may be called a leader, manager ... But in fact that is a great hard job now to take responsibility for all the processes that are being run now around this project.
20% - without any preparation, and with blocked access to any of the community channels... That is almost half of 50% needed for majority.
 If one call me thief, liar, scam, troll it is only showing how interested in real development one is.Because all I put here are the ideas. I feel respectful for the community. And this is the main core of my motives to be here. When I was developer and learned the principles I noticed that bunch of people work against it.
Voting is the highest power in this community. Ignoring the will of community should be constitutionally blocked by leading to losing power automatically.
https://twitter.com/BartekHiLevel/status/1016287127741587456

You are really approaching this wrong as far as working with any developer/project.

How is a manager going to effectively motivate a group of developers and engineers that are doing work for free most of the time?

Is he going to be performing one on one with each developer and performance ratings every quarter? What is he going to do when a developer just leaves? Developers like to solve a problem and they will work on things that interest them. The manager would add nothing to this side of project except for anger people.

Sounds like you really just want a single person to be the FACE(Steve Jobs type) of BitcoinZ for marketing purposes which seems wrong for a coin that has privacy built into it and against my idea of decentralization. I voted NO for your tweet when I came across the link on here.

Can you come up with an idea that is not centralized and controlling like the one you are proposing.

[1611478689]

1611478689

[1611478689]

1611478689

[1611478689]

1611478689

[1611478689]

1611478689

[eksys]

Here are the poll results. 20% of voters support the idea that the community should be represented by one person, elected in democratic way.
He may be called a leader, manager ... But in fact that is a great hard job now to take responsibility for all the processes that are being run now around this project.
20% - without any preparation, and with blocked access to any of the community channels... That is almost half of 50% needed for majority.
 If one call me thief, liar, scam, troll it is only showing how interested in real development one is.Because all I put here are the ideas. I feel respectful for the community. And this is the main core of my motives to be here. When I was developer and learned the principles I noticed that bunch of people work against it.
Voting is the highest power in this community. Ignoring the will of community should be constitutionally blocked by leading to losing power automatically.
https://twitter.com/BartekHiLevel/status/1016287127741587456

You are really approaching this wrong as far as working with any developer/project.

How is a manager going to effectively motivate a group of developers and engineers that are doing work for free most of the time?

Is he going to be performing one on one with each developer and performance ratings every quarter? What is he going to do when a developer just leaves? Developers like to solve a problem and they will work on things that interest them. The manager would add nothing to this side of project except for anger people.

Sounds like you really just want a single person to be the FACE(Steve Jobs type) of BitcoinZ for marketing purposes which seems wrong for a coin that has privacy built into it and against my idea of decentralization. I voted NO for your tweet when I came across the link on here.

Can you come up with an idea that is not centralized and controlling like the one you are proposing.

Decentralized project and the appointment of a leader, this is a contradiction.

But there are issues that need to be resolved quickly and responsibly. For example, if there are technical problems, any user should understand where he can get a quick response, and understand that he is not alone with his problem.

Therefore, the project should be understandable to any user who will go to the project site and find the right links to competent communities.

[X3nd3r]

Here are the poll results. 20% of voters support the idea that the community should be represented by one person, elected in democratic way.
He may be called a leader, manager ... But in fact that is a great hard job now to take responsibility for all the processes that are being run now around this project.
20% - without any preparation, and with blocked access to any of the community channels... That is almost half of 50% needed for majority.
 If one call me thief, liar, scam, troll it is only showing how interested in real development one is.Because all I put here are the ideas. I feel respectful for the community. And this is the main core of my motives to be here. When I was developer and learned the principles I noticed that bunch of people work against it.
Voting is the highest power in this community. Ignoring the will of community should be constitutionally blocked by leading to losing power automatically.
https://twitter.com/BartekHiLevel/status/1016287127741587456

You are really approaching this wrong as far as working with any developer/project.

How is a manager going to effectively motivate a group of developers and engineers that are doing work for free most of the time?

Is he going to be performing one on one with each developer and performance ratings every quarter? What is he going to do when a developer just leaves? Developers like to solve a problem and they will work on things that interest them. The manager would add nothing to this side of project except for anger people.

Sounds like you really just want a single person to be the FACE(Steve Jobs type) of BitcoinZ for marketing purposes which seems wrong for a coin that has privacy built into it and against my idea of decentralization. I voted NO for your tweet when I came across the link on here.

Can you come up with an idea that is not centralized and controlling like the one you are proposing.

Decentralized project and the appointment of a leader, this is a contradiction.

But there are issues that need to be resolved quickly and responsibly. For example, if there are technical problems, any user should understand where he can get a quick response, and understand that he is not alone with his problem.

Therefore, the project should be understandable to any user who will go to the project site and find the right links to competent communities.

On the very first page of this post they put an area called "connect with us" which has all the social media options to connect with the community. Discord, Slack and telegram would be the ideal place if you are having a problem I expect as it can function as a support chat and has for many people.

I could see a knowledge base website being helpful here as well for the long term so people could search it before just dropping into the chats saying they have a problem.

[igotek]

i see 2.18 kh/s on miner software. but i see 0 sol/s on the pool.
I see accepted shares on the miner. What is wrong ?

https://bitcoinz.axepool.com/workers/t1crKTRk3XBkbpBQ5wPTLS8KtneNh5RE6bR

[yeyz20171031]

Today, the blockchain industry is shaped by disruptive technology and consumer expectations of simplicity and comfort.Bitcoin hopes to bring something valuable to the world.

[NimaV]

I can't send Bitcoinz from my GUI wallet, I can only receive coins. it gives me this error for no reason: " check if all parameters are correct" what should I do? 

[Trafo]

i see 2.18 kh/s on miner software. but i see 0 sol/s on the pool.
I see accepted shares on the miner. What is wrong ?

https://bitcoinz.axepool.com/workers/t1crKTRk3XBkbpBQ5wPTLS8KtneNh5RE6bR

It might be wise to change the pool.

I would recommend Equipool: https://equipool.1ds.us/
Here is the list of pools that donate to the BitcoinZ Community: https://forum.btcz.rocks/t/pools-that-love-the-bitcoinz-community/51


--------------------------
BitcoinZ: https://btcz.rocks/
Thank you for BTCZ tips: t1QLuHkEigtkEtsLxENCosJ1YaKHzB2keH7

[Easteregg69]

Todays slow. "Yaahahhah"...

KIDS REACT TO NIRVANA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e6QImzM9Ayk

It's weird ehhehee..

And then they go "Eeeek eat you cancer. I don't know what that mean. -- And dirty wings ?"


This is really rock'n roll. (Stole that one(Picture of a Tuborg)).

WTF? Kids is saving your ass these days.

Beavis and Butt head Laughing Supercut
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A6j4ZClZIyY


Off topic as all ways.

PS: About Martin and the 2.49 BTC he bought a long time ago. He don't know how to install a wallet.. (And he obviously hates idiots. Count yourself in if you try to teach him something).

Five Finger Death Punch - House Of The Rising Sun
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sXYIxJScSik

You can have it on Hammond. Thomas. Late for that last supper.

Mike Reed plays "House of the Rising Sun" on the Hammond Organ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aqOSowdUE8Y

Monkey Drummer - Chris Cunningham + Aphex Twin (Monkey Human. Mostly "robot").
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u1ZGIrNf71Q

Last one i scrazyyyyy. It plays the i-had (Hi-hat)  with its dick!

One word. A long one. "computerization".

[Easteregg69]

i see 2.18 kh/s on miner software. but i see 0 sol/s on the pool.
I see accepted shares on the miner. What is wrong ?

https://bitcoinz.axepool.com/workers/t1crKTRk3XBkbpBQ5wPTLS8KtneNh5RE6bR

It might be wise to change the pool.

I would recommend Equipool: https://equipool.1ds.us/
Here is the list of pools that donate to the BitcoinZ Community: https://forum.btcz.rocks/t/pools-that-love-the-bitcoinz-community/51

igotek, our eng support telegram group -> https://t.me/joinchat/CtS-F0_g1WPcNS-QnFiTSg

Trafo, Actually, our pool is also to be recommended list and also donating to the community. So I ask you not to bring discord into the community.

Better stay under the radar.. Spend some doe on BSTY. (And it went from 220 to 275. Thank you gents and genies. I will hold mine.)

[Trafo]

i see 2.18 kh/s on miner software. but i see 0 sol/s on the pool.
I see accepted shares on the miner. What is wrong ?

https://bitcoinz.axepool.com/workers/t1crKTRk3XBkbpBQ5wPTLS8KtneNh5RE6bR

It might be wise to change the pool.

I would recommend Equipool: https://equipool.1ds.us/
Here is the list of pools that donate to the BitcoinZ Community: https://forum.btcz.rocks/t/pools-that-love-the-bitcoinz-community/51

igotek, our eng support telegram group -> https://t.me/joinchat/CtS-F0_g1WPcNS-QnFiTSg

Trafo, Actually, our pool is also to be recommended list and also donating to the community. So I ask you not to bring discord into the community.

Got it. It was not my intention, only an advice.
Everyone has the choice and freedom to choose the pool which fits him/her the best.


--------------------------
BitcoinZ: In Decentralization We Trust
Thank you for BTCZ tips: t1QLuHkEigtkEtsLxENCosJ1YaKHzB2keH7

[Brodika]

Nice to see it will stay like it has born, so PoW. I just hope the difficulty adjustement will make it always worth the miners keep the job go on.

[FollowWings]

I can't send Bitcoinz from my GUI wallet, I can only receive coins. it gives me this error for no reason: " check if all parameters are correct" what should I do? 

Send less then 10k Bro! Its a common issue at all wallets of all coins! You mining small amounts, you can send only small amounts. A work around if you transfer them in asap after you get them into another address.

[ljconstructionpa]

When does the block reward decrease? half?

[Overdrive5]

ZhashOS Release 2.02 is now available.

-Updated to EWBF 0.4

Improved performance for algo 144_5 and maxwell gpus,

Allows launching over 9 gpus in a single instance


-MD5: 241eccb117ad8e1a37850607021dcd5d  ZhashOS_r202.img.zip

https://mega.nz/#!ejBS1YxZ!gwQR1y0deZDLbj2KKIuIe8jVlgj2jDInuE2l90fXNYY

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4481713.msg40261859#msg40261859

[Trafo]

Perfect news Overdrive5! Thank you very much for your continuous support!


--------------------------
BitcoinZ: In Decentralization We Trust
Thank you for BTCZ tips: t1QLuHkEigtkEtsLxENCosJ1YaKHzB2keH7

[Trafo]

Here is the latet release of EWBF Cuda Equihash Miner v0.4: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4466962.0

EWBF v0.4 miner updates:
- Added new solver for Equihash 210,9. Available only with --algo aion (this solver is in beta status)
- Failover pools can now be specified via command-line arguments, just repeat the credentials set, but do not shuffle them (see Example below)
- Improved performance for algo 144,5 and maxwell gpus
- Fixed launching of devices

Expected performance on Zhash (144,5) ~2.0GB vram:
- 1050ti    ~15 S/s  
- 1060      ~23 S/s
- 1070      ~34 S/s
- 1080      ~38 S/s
- 1080ti    ~56 S/s

Available here:
Linux:      https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1jUhXYysli_x6MH_wQ9lY07c68Ze7WM8g
Windows: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1anfDRDVc_Fs_NceuZNuDK8HWZgcCdM3A

Greatful thanks EWBF!


--------------------------
BitcoinZ: Kaizen, a long-term commitment to continuous improvement
Thank you for BTCZ tips: t1QLuHkEigtkEtsLxENCosJ1YaKHzB2keH7

[Trafo]

Hey Developers!

Do you know what should those guys do who still have their old BTCZ coins on C-CEX exchange?
Is their any way to force C-CEX to upgrade its wallet, or that was only possible before we hit block 160 000, before Zhash algo fork has happened?

How could we help for those mates? How could they claim back their coins from C-CEX?
Could they withdraw these from C-CEX to old BTCZ wallets? Or they have lost all the old BTCZ what they have hold on C-CEX?

Any help or answer would be greatly appreciated!


--------------------------
BitcoinZ: Keep moving forward
Thank you for BTCZ tips: t1QLuHkEigtkEtsLxENCosJ1YaKHzB2keH7

 

[Trafo]

When does the block reward decrease? half?

It is stated in the Community Paper of BitcoinZ (p.4): https://drive.google.com/file/d/1aLuEcyHNKq215X4am2YQNXfQmPnV1pTt/edit

"
The halving interval is set for block 840,000 and is estimated to occur in approximately 4 years from the Sept 9th, 2017 launch.

The approximate calculation can be completed by the following steps:

a.) Blocks Per Day = Seconds In A 24hr Day / Block Time = 1,440 / 2.5 = 576
b.) Blocks Per Year = Blocks Per Day x Days In Year = 576 x 365 = 210,240
c.) Halving Interval In Years = Halving Block Interval / Blocks Per Year = 840,000 / 210,240 = 3.99

So in approximately 3.99 years, the block reward will go from 12,500 to 6,250, in accordance with the consensus code Halving Interval set at the 840,000th block. At this point, BTCZ will have reached approximately half of its total supply, or approximately 10.5 billion.
"

Therefore BTCZ halving will happen about 3 years from now.


--------------------------
BitcoinZ: Your Financial Freedom
Thank you for BTCZ tips: t1QLuHkEigtkEtsLxENCosJ1YaKHzB2keH7

[plodoto]

Sick of BTCZ's shitty price? Be part of the solution! https://forum.btcz.rocks/t/most-powerful-marketing-trick-operation-clutter-for-btcz/690

[ljconstructionpa]

BTCZ ON C-CEX

1.  Do you think they will upgrade the wallet so we can transfer the coins or are btcz on ccex lost?
2.  If they upgrade do you think its a good opportunity to buy on ccex now?