i am brand new to this project and as so i wanted to understand about the project...so.....
i read this thread..... did get much other than they are having a airdrop...
went to their white paper and started giving it a quick skimmin and then i ran into page 15
and after reading titles only the first thing that came to a loud skkkreeccching halt was"""
Penalties
As tokenholders get reward for their participation, they could also be punished for making
wrong decisions, especially in non-skilled based disputes. As said, that job is easy, but
takes responsibility. This can be solved in 2 ways, and both should be tested:
• introducing deposit voters should pay for participation in non-skilled based dispute
which they eventually can lose
• reducing reward for next successful vote(s)
Also if tokenholder collects 3 negative votes, he will be permanently banned from
disputes.
Skill based disputes will definitely not include deposit and usage of it for penalty, but
reducing reward idea can influence voters to be more responsible. Also, it downgrades
voter’s skill points. More restrictive penalty is under consideration. Main focus here is to
discourage voters which are not sure in their potential decision, but rather gamble.
"""
did i miss something here?
how about i have nothing to do with this project and at least i wont have to undergo scrutiny of bag holders here!
Ciao Ciao
Yes, I think you missed something there.
Non-skilled based are very binary, they are either-or situations. For example, it is very easy to conclude that a client or worker disapeared.
We want to discourage making the wrong decision in these simple disputes because consensus should be easily formed.
Also, you should note the word 'may' in there. The first version would most likely not have a dispute settle make a desposit.
Settling disputes in a decentralized platoforms can be quite tricky and we believe that a lot of theory and current solutions that are theory based will fall under water once they reach the customer.
Please be sure that a lot of thought went into designing our dispute system.
I hope that clears that for you. You didn't even point out the issue you had with what you quoted.
