Bitcoin Forum
April 26, 2024, 05:00:22 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Crypto and old economy will continue to ignore each other?  (Read 97 times)
The_Local_Flow (OP)
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 65
Merit: 10

Fostering local exchanges worldwide


View Profile WWW
January 17, 2018, 12:34:48 AM
 #1

Goldman is setting up a Cryptocurrency Trading Desk. Ok it's old but... What will the prospects of this choice be?
Why did a group like Goldman make this choice? Will there be more attempts by banks and financial institutions to make bitcoin more institutionalized? What should we expect from all this? can the blockchain world continue to ignore the "real" global economic market and vice versa?
When the old economy approaches these issues it seems that the strategies they set up are always very cautious and vague. Do not they believe it enough or do they have any plans to enter into a forced collaboration in the future with the help of politics or some future strategy? You can not find sufficiently informed articles on this subject. Everyone suddenly seems to realize that the bitcoin price rises and falls and public information constantly sees the crypto traders as a group of madmen who risk everything for "non-real investments". But it is hard to believe that the old system does not have a plan to enter at the right time in all of this or that it's not realizing the potential of the blockchain. Why this delay? What are they waiting for? Is the global crypto market strong enough to undergo future interference by the great powers? (I remind you that at the minimum announcement from China, the market suffers big repercussions)

Localflow
fostering local exchanges worldwide
Telegram
1714107622
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714107622

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714107622
Reply with quote  #2

1714107622
Report to moderator
1714107622
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714107622

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714107622
Reply with quote  #2

1714107622
Report to moderator
Even in the event that an attacker gains more than 50% of the network's computational power, only transactions sent by the attacker could be reversed or double-spent. The network would not be destroyed.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714107622
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714107622

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714107622
Reply with quote  #2

1714107622
Report to moderator
Pintasak
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 140
Merit: 10


View Profile
March 09, 2018, 02:52:43 AM
 #2

Goldman is setting up a Cryptocurrency Trading Desk. Ok it's old but... What will the prospects of this choice be?
Why did a group like Goldman make this choice? Will there be more attempts by banks and financial institutions to make bitcoin more institutionalized? What should we expect from all this? can the blockchain world continue to ignore the "real" global economic market and vice versa?
When the old economy approaches these issues it seems that the strategies they set up are always very cautious and vague. Do not they believe it enough or do they have any plans to enter into a forced collaboration in the future with the help of politics or some future strategy? You can not find sufficiently informed articles on this subject. Everyone suddenly seems to realize that the bitcoin price rises and falls and public information constantly sees the crypto traders as a group of madmen who risk everything for "non-real investments". But it is hard to believe that the old system does not have a plan to enter at the right time in all of this or that it's not realizing the potential of the blockchain. Why this delay? What are they waiting for? Is the global crypto market strong enough to undergo future interference by the great powers? (I remind you that at the minimum announcement from China, the market suffers big repercussions)
No i dont think so..it will continue and made each more suffecient and the sytsem will always be at its highest good investment into the cryptomarket and it getting more relevant

Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!