♣♦♥♠ [Bitcoin Gambling/Casino Review Site] - BitcoinGamblingReview.com ♣♦♥♠

[PocketRocketsCasino]

Very nicely designed site.

I will get in touch with you to see if possible to get a review of Pocket Rockets Casino on the poker review site.
I'm still going to be a bit off with the casino section of the site though.

[1714172749]

1714172749

[1714172749]

1714172749

[1714172749]

1714172749

[1714172749]

1714172749

[IamRichard]

Glad to see the site up! Looks great. We saw our review and we have some comments.

We do publish House Edge. Expected Return is the counterpart to House Edge, so if Video Poker has an expected return of 99.75%, the House Edge is .25%. Sorry for any confusion, it might be helpful if we added an extra line in our Expected Return pop-up to clarify.

Our look is designed to be retro, we're specifically trying to replicate the great experience we had with old school machines in Las Vegas and dive bars. We break the mold of a standard casino, and our players love it.

We don't give out any promotions because our House Edge is so low and margins so thin that bonuses and promotions aren't a feasible marketing strategy for us. Players are going to have the best shot winning big with a casino with a low house edge rather than a casino that has unpublished rates but gives out great promotions and comps. We see a lack of promotions as being a positive for the player.

Other notes about BitcoinVideoCasino: We offer a great android app for Video Poker, Slots, and Blackjack. Our API is freely available, and we offer autoplay and progressive jackpots on all games. Our registration system is automatic, and requires no personal information from players.

Anonymity and player security would be a good metric to review casinos on, as Bitcoin users are passionate about security and privacy. We're pro-privacy and proud of it.

Has been updated. I will add the privacy and security section to all the sites at some time in the future

[Micon]

Hello,

[Note my obvious bias as the long time SealsWithClubs site pro & affiliate manager]

IMO there is no way that Satoshi Poker should get a rating higher than SealsWithClubs [4.5 satoshi vs. 4.4 SwC]  This really disappoints me because I thought that finally there was a "real" bitcoin gambling list that I could reference as a player.  Here is the quote:

"The player traffic experienced by Satoshi Poker is comparable to that of Seals With Clubs. During our tests of the site, we found that there were over 200 players online"

This is simply untrue and poor due diligence by BitcoinGamblingReview.  I understand the point of the project is to SEO the site and sell advertising.  It is a fine model, so long as IamRichard sticks to his guns of "Honest Bitcoin Casino Reviews."  In this case, it was a simple trick from SP to display a large number of "connected" players similar to SwC on their website so anyone glancing at the site would think they are a major player and not a complete ghost town.  A quick view of http://www.pokerscout.com/ or a quick launch of both poker clients would have told the tale:



Both clients are sorted by # of players sitting.  SP has 1, single, solitary player waiting for micro-limit hold'em action.  SwC right now has over 100+ real money bitcoin poker players at 17 cash tables with 14 of those tables having more than 5 players.  Simply put, we are the only place for bitcoin poker action and there is no close 2nd place at this time.  You could play a wide range of limits and tournaments at SwC all day today or sit alone on SP.  I am extremely proud of the hard working team that makes SealsWithClubs.  Tireless hours are spent constantly improving the site and managing a large player base to provide low-rake bitcoin poker you can trust.  Our site started with Freemoney sitting alone at the SwC tables in 2011 waiting for anyone willing to play for bitcoins.  A small group of highly motivated humans have built the site starting from that one man's humble first step - so when I see reviews like this I am so angry that a small trick from a competitor has lead to gross misinformation being published.

Usually do not feel compelled to comment on such things, but this review site is extremely well designed and I think it will eventually rank high on google - so I could not stand idly by this time.

BitcoinGamblingReview - please stick true to your name and do proper due diligence on all bitcoin gambling businesses before posting reviews.

[IamRichard]

Hello,

[Note my obvious bias as the long time SealsWithClubs site pro & affiliate manager]

IMO there is no way that Satoshi Poker should get a rating higher than SealsWithClubs [4.5 satoshi vs. 4.4 SwC]  This really disappoints me because I thought that finally there was a "real" bitcoin gambling list that I could reference as a player.  Here is the quote:

"The player traffic experienced by Satoshi Poker is comparable to that of Seals With Clubs. During our tests of the site, we found that there were over 200 players online"

This is simply untrue and poor due diligence by BitcoinGamblingReview.  I understand the point of the project is to SEO the site and sell advertising.  It is a fine model, so long as IamRichard sticks to his guns of "Honest Bitcoin Casino Reviews."  In this case, it was a simple trick from SP to display a large number of "connected" players similar to SwC on their website so anyone glancing at the site would think they are a major player and not a complete ghost town.  A quick view of http://www.pokerscout.com/ or a quick launch of both poker clients would have told the tale:



Both clients are sorted by # of players sitting.  SP has 1, single, solitary player waiting for micro-limit hold'em action.  SwC right now has over 100+ real money bitcoin poker players at 17 cash tables with 14 of those tables having more than 5 players.  Simply put, we are the only place for bitcoin poker action and there is no close 2nd place at this time.  You could play a wide range of limits and tournaments at SwC all day today or sit alone on SP.  I am extremely proud of the hard working team that makes SealsWithClubs.  Tireless hours are spent constantly improving the site and managing a large player base to provide low-rake bitcoin poker you can trust.  Our site started with Freemoney sitting alone at the SwC tables in 2011 waiting for anyone willing to play for bitcoins.  A small group of highly motivated humans have built the site starting from that one man's humble first step - so when I see reviews like this I am so angry that a small trick from a competitor has lead to gross misinformation being published.

Usually do not feel compelled to comment on such things, but this review site is extremely well designed and I think it will eventually rank high on google - so I could not stand idly by this time.

BitcoinGamblingReview - please stick true to your name and do proper due diligence on all bitcoin gambling businesses before posting reviews.

Lol i think you have the wrong site. I do cover poker sites on bitcoingamblingreview.com. Furthermore, the pokersite Bitcoinpokeruniverse.com does not rate the site on a 5 star rating scale.

Please check your facts again. I really have no idea what you are talking about  Maybe you are referring to the other "new" review site that just popped up.

[casinobitco]

Hello,

[Note my obvious bias as the long time SealsWithClubs site pro & affiliate manager]

IMO there is no way that Satoshi Poker should get a rating higher than SealsWithClubs [4.5 satoshi vs. 4.4 SwC]  This really disappoints me because I thought that finally there was a "real" bitcoin gambling list that I could reference as a player.  Here is the quote:

"The player traffic experienced by Satoshi Poker is comparable to that of Seals With Clubs. During our tests of the site, we found that there were over 200 players online"

This is simply untrue and poor due diligence by BitcoinGamblingReview.  I understand the point of the project is to SEO the site and sell advertising.  It is a fine model, so long as IamRichard sticks to his guns of "Honest Bitcoin Casino Reviews."  In this case, it was a simple trick from SP to display a large number of "connected" players similar to SwC on their website so anyone glancing at the site would think they are a major player and not a complete ghost town.  A quick view of http://www.pokerscout.com/ or a quick launch of both poker clients would have told the tale:



Both clients are sorted by # of players sitting.  SP has 1, single, solitary player waiting for micro-limit hold'em action.  SwC right now has over 100+ real money bitcoin poker players at 17 cash tables with 14 of those tables having more than 5 players.  Simply put, we are the only place for bitcoin poker action and there is no close 2nd place at this time.  You could play a wide range of limits and tournaments at SwC all day today or sit alone on SP.  I am extremely proud of the hard working team that makes SealsWithClubs.  Tireless hours are spent constantly improving the site and managing a large player base to provide low-rake bitcoin poker you can trust.  Our site started with Freemoney sitting alone at the SwC tables in 2011 waiting for anyone willing to play for bitcoins.  A small group of highly motivated humans have built the site starting from that one man's humble first step - so when I see reviews like this I am so angry that a small trick from a competitor has lead to gross misinformation being published.

Usually do not feel compelled to comment on such things, but this review site is extremely well designed and I think it will eventually rank high on google - so I could not stand idly by this time.

BitcoinGamblingReview - please stick true to your name and do proper due diligence on all bitcoin gambling businesses before posting reviews.

Lol i think you have the wrong site. I do cover poker sites on bitcoingamblingreview.com. Furthermore, the pokersite Bitcoinpokeruniverse.com does not rate the site on a 5 star rating scale.

Please check your facts again. I really have no idea what you are talking about  Maybe you are referring to the other "new" review site that just popped up.

+ 1, I was actually scratching my head on this one as well. Pretty "neat" that the new review site didn't add the ONLY Bitcoin Sportsbook and Provably Fair Casino in their review I guess?

You're doing a fine job - keep it up!

[aksplace]

Hello,

[Note my obvious bias as the long time SealsWithClubs site pro & affiliate manager]

IMO there is no way that Satoshi Poker should get a rating higher than SealsWithClubs [4.5 satoshi vs. 4.4 SwC]  This really disappoints me because I thought that finally there was a "real" bitcoin gambling list that I could reference as a player.  Here is the quote:

"The player traffic experienced by Satoshi Poker is comparable to that of Seals With Clubs. During our tests of the site, we found that there were over 200 players online"

This is simply untrue and poor due diligence by BitcoinGamblingReview.  I understand the point of the project is to SEO the site and sell advertising.  It is a fine model, so long as IamRichard sticks to his guns of "Honest Bitcoin Casino Reviews."  In this case, it was a simple trick from SP to display a large number of "connected" players similar to SwC on their website so anyone glancing at the site would think they are a major player and not a complete ghost town.  A quick view of http://www.pokerscout.com/ or a quick launch of both poker clients would have told the tale:



Both clients are sorted by # of players sitting.  SP has 1, single, solitary player waiting for micro-limit hold'em action.  SwC right now has over 100+ real money bitcoin poker players at 17 cash tables with 14 of those tables having more than 5 players.  Simply put, we are the only place for bitcoin poker action and there is no close 2nd place at this time.  You could play a wide range of limits and tournaments at SwC all day today or sit alone on SP.  I am extremely proud of the hard working team that makes SealsWithClubs.  Tireless hours are spent constantly improving the site and managing a large player base to provide low-rake bitcoin poker you can trust.  Our site started with Freemoney sitting alone at the SwC tables in 2011 waiting for anyone willing to play for bitcoins.  A small group of highly motivated humans have built the site starting from that one man's humble first step - so when I see reviews like this I am so angry that a small trick from a competitor has lead to gross misinformation being published.

Usually do not feel compelled to comment on such things, but this review site is extremely well designed and I think it will eventually rank high on google - so I could not stand idly by this time.

BitcoinGamblingReview - please stick true to your name and do proper due diligence on all bitcoin gambling businesses before posting reviews.

Lol i think you have the wrong site. I do cover poker sites on bitcoingamblingreview.com. Furthermore, the pokersite Bitcoinpokeruniverse.com does not rate the site on a 5 star rating scale.

Please check your facts again. I really have no idea what you are talking about   Maybe you are referring to the other "new" review site that just popped up.

clearly you didn't write the review that's okay I don't write all of the reviews we list.. But one thing I do know is Seals With Clubs does not have any major competitors at this point in time and any other bitcoin poker site has less than 25 active at anytime besides StrikeSaphire which they might have 50 or so at any given time you would have to get them to validate that.

[bit777]

Hello,

[Note my obvious bias as the long time SealsWithClubs site pro & affiliate manager]

IMO there is no way that Satoshi Poker should get a rating higher than SealsWithClubs [4.5 satoshi vs. 4.4 SwC]  This really disappoints me because I thought that finally there was a "real" bitcoin gambling list that I could reference as a player.  Here is the quote:

"The player traffic experienced by Satoshi Poker is comparable to that of Seals With Clubs. During our tests of the site, we found that there were over 200 players online"

This is simply untrue and poor due diligence by BitcoinGamblingReview.  I understand the point of the project is to SEO the site and sell advertising.  It is a fine model, so long as IamRichard sticks to his guns of "Honest Bitcoin Casino Reviews."  In this case, it was a simple trick from SP to display a large number of "connected" players similar to SwC on their website so anyone glancing at the site would think they are a major player and not a complete ghost town.  A quick view of http://www.pokerscout.com/ or a quick launch of both poker clients would have told the tale:



Both clients are sorted by # of players sitting.  SP has 1, single, solitary player waiting for micro-limit hold'em action.  SwC right now has over 100+ real money bitcoin poker players at 17 cash tables with 14 of those tables having more than 5 players.  Simply put, we are the only place for bitcoin poker action and there is no close 2nd place at this time.  You could play a wide range of limits and tournaments at SwC all day today or sit alone on SP.  I am extremely proud of the hard working team that makes SealsWithClubs.  Tireless hours are spent constantly improving the site and managing a large player base to provide low-rake bitcoin poker you can trust.  Our site started with Freemoney sitting alone at the SwC tables in 2011 waiting for anyone willing to play for bitcoins.  A small group of highly motivated humans have built the site starting from that one man's humble first step - so when I see reviews like this I am so angry that a small trick from a competitor has lead to gross misinformation being published.

Usually do not feel compelled to comment on such things, but this review site is extremely well designed and I think it will eventually rank high on google - so I could not stand idly by this time.

BitcoinGamblingReview - please stick true to your name and do proper due diligence on all bitcoin gambling businesses before posting reviews.

Lol i think you have the wrong site. I do cover poker sites on bitcoingamblingreview.com. Furthermore, the pokersite Bitcoinpokeruniverse.com does not rate the site on a 5 star rating scale.

Please check your facts again. I really have no idea what you are talking about   Maybe you are referring to the other "new" review site that just popped up.

clearly you didn't write the review that's okay I don't write all of the reviews we list.. But one thing I do know is Seals With Clubs does not have any major competitors at this point in time and any other bitcoin poker site has less than 25 active at anytime besides StrikeSaphire which they might have 50 or so at any given time you would have to get them to validate that.

Alan, don't try to hijack competitor threads. For more information on aksplace, please refer to https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=310568.0

[Micon]

1)  I'm a fucking idiot [said in Philly Seymore voice: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ft8Z5VPTHS0 ]

2)  yup wrong site / wrong thread / was reviewing the reviewers today to see where SwC stands / carry on / sorry

[IamRichard]

1)  I'm a fucking idiot [said in Philly Seymore voice: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ft8Z5VPTHS0 ]

2)  yup wrong site / wrong thread / was reviewing the reviewers today to see where SwC stands / carry on / sorry

 

PM sent out regarding changes in permalinks (noob mistake )

Averaging 50-70 uniques a day

[aksplace]

good job

Glad to see the site up! Looks great. We saw our review and we have some comments.

We do publish House Edge. Expected Return is the counterpart to House Edge, so if Video Poker has an expected return of 99.75%, the House Edge is .25%. Sorry for any confusion, it might be helpful if we added an extra line in our Expected Return pop-up to clarify.

Our look is designed to be retro, we're specifically trying to replicate the great experience we had with old school machines in Las Vegas and dive bars. We break the mold of a standard casino, and our players love it.

We don't give out any promotions because our House Edge is so low and margins so thin that bonuses and promotions aren't a feasible marketing strategy for us. Players are going to have the best shot winning big with a casino with a low house edge rather than a casino that has unpublished rates but gives out great promotions and comps. We see a lack of promotions as being a positive for the player.

Other notes about BitcoinVideoCasino: We offer a great android app for Video Poker, Slots, and Blackjack. Our API is freely available, and we offer autoplay and progressive jackpots on all games. Our registration system is automatic, and requires no personal information from players.

Anonymity and player security would be a good metric to review casinos on, as Bitcoin users are passionate about security and privacy. We're pro-privacy and proud of it.

Will update accordingly when I have the time

[IamRichard]

OP updated with new info.

Kind of messed up the SEO a bit because I had tons of 404 errors and noob permalinks

Anyhow, I updated a bunch of reviews and will start adding new ones.

As for the ratings of promotion of reviews. Even with a low house edge, try to create some type of incentive for players to play.

Lastly, ours reviews are completely unbiased. We can't be bought (unless you want to buy the entire site!)

[b!z]

Imitation is the best form of flattery.

The site is looking great, but I think you should fix the resolution or size on some of the images.

[IamRichard]

Imitation is the best form of flattery.

The site is looking great, but I think you should fix the resolution or size on some of the images.

No big deal. I threw up this site to test a bunch of new SEO techniques that I haven't had a chance to test. I am not really here to compete for forum traffic, I am making it to grab organic traffic plus, organic traffic converts a lot more! (for potential advertisers)

Not sure on the images, you mean images on the posts? I don't want to design banners for sites :S

Not sure why you don't reply to me on skype, I offered you the site lol for a pretty reasonable price and I will continue with the SEO.

Anyhow I will continue improving this site until I reach the top of Google. I'd say 3 months at my rate.
Bitcoinpokeruniverse.com is already ranking #6 for bitcoin poker and I'm only toying with that site.

But you should state your "un-biased" affiliation with a gambling site

[b!z]

Imitation is the best form of flattery.

The site is looking great, but I think you should fix the resolution or size on some of the images.

No big deal. I threw up this site to test a bunch of new SEO techniques that I haven't had a chance to test. I am not really here to compete for forum traffic, I am making it to grab organic traffic plus, organic traffic converts a lot more! (for potential advertisers)

Not sure on the images, you mean images on the posts? I don't want to design banners for sites :S

Not sure why you don't reply to me on skype, I offered you the site lol for a pretty reasonable price and I will continue with the SEO.

Anyhow I will continue improving this site until I reach the top of Google. I'd say 3 months at my rate.
Bitcoinpokeruniverse.com is already ranking #6 for bitcoin poker and I'm only toying with that site.

But you should state your "un-biased" affiliation with a gambling site

I haven't checked my skype messages for a while, sorry about that. I'll make sure to login more often.

Which gambling site are you referring to? We are not affiliated with any companies. If you feel a review on Bitcoin Reviewer is unfair, or biased, please let me know. Thanks!

[IamRichard]

Imitation is the best form of flattery.

The site is looking great, but I think you should fix the resolution or size on some of the images.

No big deal. I threw up this site to test a bunch of new SEO techniques that I haven't had a chance to test. I am not really here to compete for forum traffic, I am making it to grab organic traffic plus, organic traffic converts a lot more! (for potential advertisers)

Not sure on the images, you mean images on the posts? I don't want to design banners for sites :S

Not sure why you don't reply to me on skype, I offered you the site lol for a pretty reasonable price and I will continue with the SEO.

Anyhow I will continue improving this site until I reach the top of Google. I'd say 3 months at my rate.
Bitcoinpokeruniverse.com is already ranking #6 for bitcoin poker and I'm only toying with that site.

But you should state your "un-biased" affiliation with a gambling site

I haven't checked my skype messages for a while, sorry about that. I'll make sure to login more often.

Which gambling site are you referring to? We are not affiliated with any companies. If you feel a review on Bitcoin Reviewer is unfair, or biased, please let me know. Thanks!

No Problem.

Added Scam Complaints/Accusations to website!

[Hfleer]

IMO this is a poorly done review site.  I've visited most if not all of the sites reviewed, and you would not be able to convince me this site is unbiased.  I think we see this trend in review sites as a common occurence.

[IamRichard]

IMO this is a poorly done review site.  I've visited most if not all of the sites reviewed, and you would not be able to convince me this site is unbiased.  I think we see this trend in review sites as a common occurence.

Sure thats fine. Draw your own conclusion.

Would you like to write the objective reviews? I would gladly post them.

Actually on second thought. I will even pay you 0.05 BTC for each 300 word review.

[IamRichard]

Getting some slow organic traffic. Though the keywords have slipped a bit

[IamRichard]

Advertising slot for Nov22-Dec22 Taken

OP updated

[IamRichard]

We accept guest blogs. 400 words minimum of high quality content

Free for most sites, some will have to pay a fee. Blog will sit on homepage for a week or so.