Bounty and too many participants

[vebby]

if in a bounty there are so many participants, I think you should see the total supply first. If the total supply for bounty is large, then it's okay to stay followed. And pray just hope bounty run tight, so only really competent participants who will pass until the final stage bounty. Meanwhile, if the total supply is a little, I think it is better to just leave it and look for other bounty. Other good projects are plenty, so do not worry.

[yujli]

Given that I see a lot of rich people choose to not drop, because they have found that make up more simple, telegraphic transfer, sets a rich and Twitter is now a lot of people are doing fine major case, and according to the richness of the highlight is that we need a direction, keep in mind the ultimate goal in order to maintain and harmful exchange and confidential strategic distance, this is very fierce.

[CryptoAllDay]

When there are too many bounty participants, it might be a good idea to use your time on one where the split of the allocated tokens is more favorable.  So not only do the amount of participants matter, but what percentage is being distributed for those total participants.  For example: 5% of 200K tokens being split 10000 ways is the same as 5% of 100K tokens being split between 5000 people.

[Semen89]

At the moment, this is still a big problem, since a lot of people and as a fact all will get very little for all the work that they have done and I think it's not fair

[NathanJB]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

Let's better give that to the bounty managers themselves or the moderators of this forum. As for me, I do not really look at the popularity of the bounty managers. I look at the specific projects. I do not even consider the manager to be the basis of my bounty participation. After all, even the most popular bounty managers have projects that are either scam or clear failure. 

[ADEMNL]

Bounty campaigns just need to make a limit on the number of participants based on their budget. What would people, on average, receive at least $ 30 per week.

[whatthesith]

Bounty companies just need to make a limit on the number of participants based on their budget. What would people, on average, receive at least $ 30 per week.

That is true, this I said in the first post .
But it should be more than 30$ per week  .

[Aris novianto]

Bounty is too many participants, it resulted in our income decreases and also our income is decreasing, bounty project followers are a lot.

[tuvic01]

Yes I think there should be some regulations to sieve participants but also that doesn't mean we should shut out new participants in doing bounties, there are a lot of bounty campaign that is available only to junior members above which in my opinion already sieve out the newbies and so reward can be abundant for the few participants 

[holderman]

Before participating the bounty campaigns you had better search and check the number of participants. Because the less people join , the more people get profit.

[virtiklo]

Now bounties are very popular.  And many people participate in the bounty.  Some managers limit the maximum number of participants and this is good.

[Myraidcoins]

A large number of participants in bounty campaigns became a really big problem. I do not understand why bounty managers do not limit it to at least some adequate figures.

[olumyd]

A large number of participants in bounty campaigns became a really big problem. I do not understand why bounty managers do not limit it to at least some adequate figures.

I think it's because they want to have the maximum effect for the campaign - more campaign participants results into more publicity. The campaign is more about the project and not the bounty hunter.

[Krabat]

The problem is not only this. a large number of participants is not the worst. Much worse is that projects often deceive their participants. Very often people who participate in the bounty do not get anything in the end.

[zaluzi kroos]

Yes with the campaign participants who often soar automatically can reduce the results obtained later so we should be able to join as soon as possible if we want to continue to gain an advantage.

[arkaasay]

Too many participants? I have to disagree with you, Actually, there is a bounty campaign that limits their participants. Of course, many of the participants are very good at promoting brands, their products.

[yeeyeyaya]

More and more prize hunters mean the world of crypto is widespread and the community participates. I also do not think it's a problem because too many campaigns are popping up every day.

[Babyjamz3026]

I disagree with you. Sure, more people coming to participate in Bounty. If the community will continue to grow quickly in the future, Bounties will create new rules, where old participants could continue their work with a high reward, while newcomers would need to gain more experience before getting high rewards.

[rozenkreitzer]

I also think that recently the number of participants in projects has increased very much. It seems to me that this has a very strong effect on the potential profit of each participant.

[kb24mvp]

I think they should limit the number of participants, and the grading should be more serious. I see a lot of scoring bounty alike, though there are those who do not do or leave midway!