Bounty and too many participants

[Dexit]

I think bounty managers must limit the campaign participants, if there is a limit then there will not be many campaign participants. It is the best solution, for example, look at the amon bounty..

[1713583933]

1713583933

[1713583933]

1713583933

[1713583933]

1713583933

[Sevaev]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

All reward activities must be limited by participants in order to provide a good reward for everyone. It's also a good idea to give the bounty hunter a rating for the project to choose the best fit for their company, but I can't imagine how it will work.

[Gummybear67]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

That would be a great idea however it's too dificult to implement since we don't have a specific standard to whom we can consider to call someone as a "best particpant".

[Mamaecrypto]

Your statment is true, however the number of icos and bounties have increased as well so one can participate in more bounties and if spread out payments could still be satisfactory. I find that there is still lots of room to make money from media bounties, translations and signatures. Twitter and facebook bounties always saturate and I never expect a high payment for those.

[sashasemenov]

Now i am doing the sparkster ico bounty. It is not really oversubscribed but preaty hard to do! Lot's of rules there. But who cares, the project is very good so i work hard too!

[Loran Lann]

I think that this is not a big problem! There are many campaigns that are not very popular, so they do not have a lot of participants, which will allow you to earn more tokens

[Verrader4]

well i have read this question or suggestion you may say many times in the past and no absolute answer comes to mind but, every new free lance work initially (in this case bounty hunting) has a heavy payoff which will reduce with growing time and it will saturate so people expecting previous payoffs should revise their expectation because too many people have realized the potential gain from bounty campaigns. Going with KYC might help but that raises doubts about privacy so there it goes. Everyone wants piece of that pie as they say.

[greydking]

I'm sure it's not a problem for the marketers of ico. Of course, many of the participants are very good at promoting their brand, product. That is very important in the success of the ico campaign. In other words, many people join the bounty and I'm sure many of them invest in that ico. I was one of them.

[Cedrick]

I think that this is not a big problem! There are many campaigns that are not very popular, so they do not have a lot of participants, which will allow you to earn more tokens

yup that is not a big problem cause bounties have allocated funds in every bounty, example the only tokens in signature is 750k tokens and the other is in the oher branch of bounties like facebook,twitter, and etc. if you really work hard for tat and you receive your tokens that is your prize and it doesn't mean that there's a lot participants in that certain campaign it doesn't mean that they divide the funds in equals.

[BestSSS]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

Yes, it really is and this has to be dealt with somehow - very many bounty hunters use bots and register with all bounty companies. I think they should be calculated like for example by IP and excluded from the companies. Many people earn dozens of accounts to earn money and as you said earnings will become less and less

[teskostecenje]

As the time goes, Many people learn about cryptocurrency, bitcoin and altcoins. Also they learn about it in the forum such as  Bitcointalk.org which is originally created to help people who is interested to learn about the topic. As they give information they also give rewards and contribution to everyone by posting Bounty Campaigns that's why many we have many participants in our bounty campaigns with a help of social media.

[Gunawan82]

Bounty is always open for everyone but in every bounty campaign limit participation can enroll i think.Participation are rapidly increasing so payment is less day by day.I think yes need regulation with bounty campaign and rules will be strict for spammer.

[gaponya]

Because of this, I left the social bond because it takes a lot of time but does not pay anything, so I stopped doing it!

[delltop]

This really has become a problem, many use bots in bounty campaigns. To participate in them was not profitable,so I'm just writing articles.

[Mak7im4ik7]

Bounty companies are becoming more popular. I think the criteria for selecting participants will soon increase.

[Mak7im4ik7]

Now the tasks of social networks are more like spam. It is necessary that managers would better choose the participants

[gorobif]

I hope that the strict rules, if introduced, will not soon) Many participants = a lot of advertising = investors = market growth.

[vodovozvodi]

I think that this is not a big problem! There are many campaigns that are not very popular, so they do not have a lot of participants, which will allow you to earn more tokens

Hmm, But these campaigns do not guarantee you a good reward and you can just spend you time for nothing

[Herressy]

I think that this is not a big problem! There are many campaigns that are not very popular, so they do not have a lot of participants, which will allow you to earn more tokens

yup that is not a big problem cause bounties have allocated funds in every bounty, example the only tokens in signature is 750k tokens and the other is in the oher branch of bounties like facebook,twitter, and etc. if you really work hard for tat and you receive your tokens that is your prize and it doesn't mean that there's a lot participants in that certain campaign it doesn't mean that they divide the funds in equals.

For what you have to work for and for the rules on how much tokens you can be able to earn this is what you can have for there is some certain bounty that limit the participants but there is some not and gather more participants well depends on the project.

[Fosco]

Bounty is a good thing i think, but not with facebook