Bounty and too many participants

[Andwarchik]

I think new participants and popularity of cryptocurrency means new money which will be invested in cryptocurrency, more new ICO, tokens and cryptocurrencies and more new bounty project! All of this is interdependent!

[1713581145]

1713581145

[1713581145]

1713581145

[1713581145]

1713581145

[1713581145]

1713581145

[Beazerdred]

Now there is a lot of competition and you just have to be the best to make money on this. If you constantly develop, you can earn money here

[cryptotnak]

Bounty managers should give stakes based on the quality of the posts,not from the ranks because that is stupidity most of these high ranks doesnt even know how to compose or deliver basic english sentences,i am not saying all of them but most people i know doesnt deserved the high ranking stakes especially from the signatures.

[refaelsh]

the number of participants has increased, but the number of bounty has also increased significantly, so choose projects that are more interesting for you, participate and earn.

[refaelsh]

The number of participants has increased, but the number of bounty has also increased significantly, so choose projects that are more interesting for you, participate and earn.

[Kiefner]

I agree that there are more and more new people. Bounty companies are crowded. Some managers limit the number of participants. For example, the first 500 people - in my opinion so far this is the only good solution. But soon this will not be enough and will have to come up with something to solve this problem.

[abduljacklu]

Might be a good idea if there are some new rules about bounty campaigns or the bounty managers will do tha same allocations like in bounty hive there are  tiers which will give equality with the participants ,high ranking accounts would have limited gains because there are limited stakes that they can get,unlike from traditional stakes that only those high ranks will get most of the bounty stakes.

[salandacrypto]

If you are looking to earn some crypto I would look into Crowdholding. They are a co-creation platform where you earn crypto for giving feedback to tasks. It is free to sign up to and you can get multiple tokens. It's a more organised way to earn crypto than picking random bounty campaigns. Link is below.

https://www.crowdholding.com

[singpolyma]

Yes, the crypt becomes very popular and more people start participating in bounty campaigns, but I'm more worried about the fact there are even more scams.

[Emilyearl]

Some regulations like rank or merit system will make it more profitable to hunters as it used to be before now. But the aim of bounty campaign is to spread the project to all and the more people join the campaigns, the more exposed the project becomes and the more investors are attracted.

[HoaNguyen]

I think all upcoming bounty campaign should limit the number of participant in their campaign like only 100 pariticipants for each part of bounty campaign or they can require Full Member rank and above can be able to join their bounty campaign, I think it'll help decreasing a great number of participants in each bounty campaign. For now, almost bounty campaign often have thousands participants, it's really great so it take too much time for bounty manager and their team to manage every participant and calculate the spreadsheet at the end of bounty campaign.

[Jose.Tormo]

Restricting the number of bounty participants is a decision best left to the funding project teams, not to this forum or any outside "regulator."  Every project is different - if a project team wants a huge bounty population, they will create an easy airdrop campaign.  If they want a small, tough bounty, they will offer just a handful of people tokens for doing some extraordinary work (translation, moderation, software debugging, publicity, whatever).  Why even think about setting rules to govern these kind of programs?

[sorehammer]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

Totally agree with you because there should be strict rules and bounty managers should pick full members rank.With increasing participants reward also gets reduce.Bounty managers should pick out those participants who have track record of constructive/Logical comments,so that it may contribute a lot towards the success of that bounty campaigns.

[pstraene]

When I read this, I always have to think about envion. the bountx people have been waiting for their tokens for many weeks. There were also thousands of participants and the counting takes far too long

[jakiro.hovard]

I think that this behavior of people is due precisely to the fact that now there are a lot of people on the forum who have received ranks. Probably, therefore, they introduced merit in order to simply reduce the number of people who are now here. I think this is a great feature on this forum.

[HashieNewb]

Yes it happens too many times and the results are awful because the people whow got involved early are facing a very low profit for their efforts. The participant number has been limited in the most successful ICOs.

It may not be a bad thing for bounties because a whole lot of promotion is needed for the ICO. If there is a lot of people in the campaign then the project is likely to do well.

[Fatunad]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

You cant stop such thing because bounty programs doesnt really have strict requirement for you to join which means you can easily join up without any problems as long you can able to do the task then it would be already okay and expect bounties will really comes lesser and lesser as the participant numbers do soar up.You cant stop it but now when those ICO are changing rules which do some of them require KYC it start out to make changes in numbers.

[matsusomoto]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

Signatures are the only way we could get decent amount of bounties,social media campaigns are crowded with these cheaters, a lot of multi accounts are getting rewards,we cannot do something about these but the campaign managers can fight these cheaters and in thinking about KYC thing from every accounts here but theymos wont agree with these surely.

[dzhan]

Usually the bounty managers have their restrictions and rules , including the limits of participants, the quality of posting in the forum, and the quality social media accounts of their participants and so on. They aren't accepting everyone applying to join, unless if the project have low value and want cheap and low quality advertising.

[KTChampions]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

You always want to earn more, but when there is a person who agrees to do a job cheaper you can not do anything about it. It is a free economy and everyone decides for what price to work for him. If you do not like earnings, then you can stop doing this activity.