Bounty and too many participants

[cryptochr]

Any regulation set for bounty needs to be done very carefully so that it is not unfair to anyone, whether that is existing bounty hunters or participants who want to start bounty. We must remember that a lot of the people who join bounty, do so because they dont have much money to invest. This is a good opportunity for us to gain tokens which we can later trade to hopefully make profit.

[zuyfg888]

It is true, but the campaign manager or the escrow need to have enough budget to sustain the campaign. Before the bounty begins, you need to have enough financial needs to gain a lot of advertisement for your token. This would also help bounties to gain more investor, can seek a lot of participants for their token

[rachelia13]

What do you  mean by bounty regulations, if you  feel bounty participants are increasing daily and you are no earning good profit from your company, them you should concentrate on other bounties and let go off twitter and facebook campaign. Always check spreadsheet first before registering for any compaign.

I am also confused what regulation your mean. What does it mean to limit participants for bounty campaign especially for facebook and twitter? Because both bounty is the most participants. I agree with you, if you feel bounty campaign participants too much and you will not get much profit, then leave it and looking for another bounty. In this forum every time a lot of new bounty popping up, you just need to find what you think will give a lot of profit. I have no problem with many participants because all the members in this forum have the same rights to follow bounty like facebook and twitter as much as they can.

[Yewnais]

The fact is that there are so many bounty programs now that the number of participants can be doubled. And even after that in Ukraine it will be favorable to be engaged in it.

[aircrusan]

The more people involved in a campaign, the less money is being earned. Very popular campaigns are very slow to pay and you can take your money after months. The amount of stake that you will also receive is also very low

[Btcalimie]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

Well, I think it is not a bad thing mate. The true purpose of bounty campaign is to spread words about the project and partially advertise it. The more people who do it the higher number of people could hear about it. This is why having more hunters is not a bad thing.

[acheampong64]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

Well the issue is that many people want or would like to start crypto by earning coins for free. And one way of earning free coins without investing your money is bounties that is why there is this upsurge of bounty hunters. One thing we must note is that, though there are so many bounty participants there are also so many projects requiring the services of bounty hunters.
Also, Many bounty managers have their own ways of preventing so many people from joining so that each participant can get enough coins. They sometimes put a limit to the number of people who can join a particular bounty campaign. Also as people are finding out that bounties are not lucrative as it was before, they'll move on and find something else to do. This is crypto man, there are so many ways to survive here with the so many different ways of earning.

[Alstad]

I agree that there are more bounty hunters, but the number of ISO also increases.
The problem is not in the number of the bounty, but in cheaters who take a large part of the pool with multi-accounts or steal articles, they use your nicknames to receive steaks in the subscription campaigns. The problem is in managers who consider steaks as horrible, or do not do it correctly (according to their own rules).
Also, not all developers indicate in the smart contracts conditions for the bounty of the campaign, which leads to fraud.

Part of the problem is solved through the introduction of the KYC, the audit of smart contracts, the limitation of the number of participants.

[marginal]

Another great way to gain profit from bounties is to work in a places, where there is not so many people participating, like blog, reddit, medium, translations (if you can)

[euggio]

In my personal opinion there's nothing wrong in what more participants joining bounty campaigns, because this is really easy money for so many people for not so hard work.            

[Hopeliza]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

For me, you have a point there but I can see that there's nothing wrong of there's a lot of participants it means there's a lot of people who can spread about the project then the budget will increase more so there's really nothing wrong.

[JustQueen]

I think it's alright to have a lot of participants because we see that having a lot of participants is the first target for the project so they will support the project in the first place.

[BitcoinCazh]

i think its not change to much but if you have high rank, and i think too many participants its just make too many spamers its critical, this forum is created for sharing information not for bounty and i think in here because bounty this forum changes function to bounty not for sharing

[nikay12]

Having a lot if participants in every bounties is not a big deal because it's a big help for the project because they help the ICO to become successful in order to have the profit for each participants.

[almtu]

It is not rightful if huge participants can participate in the campaign with such low token allocation for the whole campaign. For example you work for 2months then after you got only 100 token. Wtf, project is that! They want to get more bounty hunters but they are not willing to give more to bounty hunters to make them happy by the payment and with the project. I think those manager have the full authority for it is under their management.

[Goaheadz]

many already know that bounties are rewarded with tokens, and you do not need to make any investments, and tokens can then increase many times, and you will again profit by reselling them at a price. Of course, this is an attractive way to make a profit, and I'm not surprised that people forget about simple investments.

[ungongbuotan]

Bounty campaigns have become popular and have gain a lot of attention lately resulting to the rise of bounty hunters. I think this rise of many participants is a good thing and is a healthy competition. Those who are afraid or annoyed with the increase of participants are either worried about somebody taking their jobs. Even the real world their is a lot of competition, if you are not quite good or a slacker then someone is willing to take your place.

[veejay2716]

It is better to have more participants in bounty campaigns to spread better the project so that it will be known by the others and many investors will attract to this to make it successful.

[drippx]

 many participants lead to the distribution of more and more people, resulting in more and more income, if the number of participants is more. If there are too many participants, look for another person who is still a small number of participants.

[bunny0612]

I think it's okay. More people participants, project will more and more popular. They can hit softcap and hardcap, only then will they pay us. Last year, when bounty not generality, they can also run ads in social network to attract investors. But until now, social network will ban ICO's ads because a lot of scam happened. They will need human resources to advertise, and who? Yes, us. So i think they will pay us the right amount to advertise their project