Bounty and too many participants

[yannick225]

I think it's okay. More people participants, project will more and more popular. They can hit softcap and hardcap, only then will they pay us. Last year, when bounty not generality, they can also run ads in social network to attract investors. But until now, social network will ban ICO's ads because a lot of scam happened. They will need human resources to advertise, and who? Yes, us. So i think they will pay us the right amount to advertise their project it's simple at understand.

[1713416146]

1713416146

[1713416146]

1713416146

[bekohkoning]

I think if a project is a lot of participants then it signifies the number of people who believe in the project and more and more people who participate spread promotions so that more investors will know so as to have many opportunities in achieving a success

[grknondr]

You are right mate. For example, I joined a bounty and when I looked to the sğreadsheet I saw that there were more than 3000 participants. What can you earn from this bounty even if you continue till the end ? There may be some regulations about participant limits. For example, 200 participants for twitter, 100 for signature etc.

[malekcap]

i completly agree with you, but the issue is just to avoid social mediam compaigns because s you said there are many participents wich make it very less and less rewards! so i advice you by signature compaign and telegram compaign or translation compaign and if you have famoust youtube channel so media compaign (sometimes it said contnent creation compaign) is the best !

[godfredmanu]

To regulate participants in a bounty campaings will seems a lot of work for managers, that is why rules and regulations with limits are mostly set. But the more a campaign has many participants without limits, and less funds raised, the lesser the rewards.It always seems, social media campaign is flooded with more participants yet the percentage allocated to it is very small. That is why , signature campaing is best way to get great reward from bounties.

[lightning mcqueen]

I think more and more participants join in a project ICO will be increasingly added to the project a success. Karna with many participants of the project will be easier in running the promotion.

Yes agree, because the idea of this bounty with more participants is to reach as many people as possible. It's an alternative route for bounty managers to scale the rewards based on the amount of participation, so if there's a lot of participants in one ICO, they give bonus stakes.

[rurubot]

It is true that those legit participants earn the profits they don't deserve because of the new participants. But still we can't stop them if they also want to earn profits. I think if we add up another new rules and regulations, those legit participants will also suffer from it. I believe earning merits not easily is enough to limit everyone to rank up and earn a lot. So lucky those who have already a higher rank, but that only means that they are the real early participants here.

[djscreem01]

Bounty campaigns are more and more popular, and the number bounty hunter in crypto grows with every day.
Therefore, some managers limit the number of participants in their companies.
I think this is the right decision and fully support it.

[alexandrofff]

LuckyToken doesn't have a lot participants yet so don't waste your time!

[AliKooks]

LuckyToken doesn't have a lot participants yet so don't waste your time!

That's why I decided to take part in WeLocal because I see my future profitable

[mitsarasss]

Looks like there will be no social media campaigns in future: a lot of people, 10$- for two month of work or something like that. Or we need some limits on it.

[Zumbiko]

Yes I agree too many members became in companies Bounty. I hope companies will start to limit the number of participants.

[Usui-Kun]

Well it really depends if the ico or campaing is doing pretty good. I think more bounty hunters are concerned about joining at the most rewarding campaigns so they study more about them and join to the once that they think will give them the most out of the effort they will put into.

[spike420211]

Social media bounties are dead, there are no more good payments, too many participants, too low profit. You can do 20 projects with very very low profit.

[royale143]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

That's actually one of the problems of bounties right now. Because it's so easy to do and so easy to commit into, there are so many participants in every project's bounty that the amount of profit you can earn becomes less because it is divided to more participants. However, that's the aspect we joiners have to accept and endure because bounties is really one of the best means to earn coins and tokens in the market. It's good for beginners and seasoned users, which expands the population that participates in it.

[DariaBriklaiz]

You can take part in bounty campaigns, which has restricted amount of participants and your rewards will not depend on quantity of bounty hunters

[Ailmand]

That's a tough one; it's definitely an early adoption model for profit, but what sort of regulations can be put in place? How would you define the "Best" participants? Likely any system would only make it suitable for long-term participants/members of some group and only serve to discourage anyone who is just entering the community.

That can't be helped mate. I say that because bounties are one of the best means to earn coins and tokens without actually subjecting yourself to time consuming and too demanding tasks. I mean, the bounties themselves differ in the level of commitment and task your need to give and do, but looking at them in a bigger picture, they are all easy compared to other ventures like trading, which is too risky and complicated, especially for beginners. Another good thing about bounties that it can be chosen by beginners and professionals alike.

[baus]

This is true, that is why i am always participating in those bounties who have no more than 300 - 500 participants, otherwise the stakes are not going to be worth nothing because of the amount of participants that are in there (and the pool varies a lot)

[iqbalrozi]

It's normal. Day by day many newcomers will come in bicointalk and when they will know about bounty campaigns then they will participate in those campaigns for sure. So, it's normal. But I think every campaign should limit participants like bountyhive. Specially needmoney's campaigns! He accepts more than 21K Participants in his bounty campaigns! He should make a limit!

[Igromania]

Yes I agree too many members became in companies Bounty. I hope companies will start to limit the number of participants.

on the contrary, I noticed that there are fewer participants, not everyone can do such monotonous work every day.