Bounty and too many participants

[energodar2019]

It's normal. Day by day many newcomers will come in bicointalk and when they will know about bounty campaigns then they will participate in those campaigns for sure. So, it's normal. But I think every campaign should limit participants like bountyhive. Specially needmoney's campaigns! He accepts more than 21K Participants in his bounty campaigns! He should make a limit!

For the project, it is more profitable for more people to advertise them and they do not care that we receive little, the main thing is to invest money in the project! I believe that in the future the rules of participation in the bounty will change and the flow of new people will decrease!

[LooBaao]

Perhaps in the future bonuses will no longer exist. And if we exist we will get very tokens when there are too many people involved in the campaign. ICO days are banned by government and users do not want to invest in ICO. because of ICO scam.

[DariaBriklaiz]

This is true, that is why i am always participating in those bounties who have no more than 300 - 500 participants, otherwise the stakes are not going to be worth nothing because of the amount of participants that are in there (and the pool varies a lot)

You can take part in bounty campaigns, which has restricted amount of participants and your rewards will not depend on quantity of bounty hunters

300 - 500 participants is also too match. Full member can earn 800 - 1000 dollars per month in bounty campaign with 100-200 participants

[Morticio]

Indeed, there is such a problem. But there is always a bounty company, which is less promising in terms of development, but in which there are much fewer participants! Accordingly, in the future, it can bring you more income!

[Flamebellow]

I think social media bounties are already dead , terrific amount of participants make it useless to participate it . Signature campaigns attract many people too , but high ranked members still able to earn a good money there. I think if crypto will become more popular in the future , the amount of participants will destroy this business , because we do not such a high amount of ICO's with bounty programs , that can satisfy the growing amount of bounty hunters .

[clairewarwick7866]

You can search bounty campaigns where numbers of participants are restricted, for example to 500 or 1000. There are lot of such campaigns

[fotosonics]

Indeed, there is such a problem. But there is always a bounty company, which is less promising in terms of development, but in which there are much fewer participants! Accordingly, in the future, it can bring you more income!

You're right! Now in large bounty campaigns of large ISO projects, a huge number of students are recruited, but there are examples that bounty managers are gaining a limited number of students, which gives them a chance to earn much more!

[sammyp]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

To solve this issue and appreciate the work of bounty hunters, I would also suggest that number of participants should be spelled out for each bounty campaign. This will limit the number of participants thus increase the reward for participants. The only disadvantage with this if applied would be that; it will be based on first come first serve but I think that will cool.

[Nichao]

more participants -> less price for stake, yes. But
more participants -> more info -> more advertisement -> more interest to the project -> higher price after exchange listing.

[abitgelluh]

dev thinking
requires many participants to make more people promote the project so that more people will know how the project is developing
thinking hunters
with a large number of participants will get a small payment in the work for 2-3 months may be only $20 - $ 50 (social media)
how will they create new rules to limit the number of participants? this is a very difficult choice

[aliceayag]

As the time goes, Many people learn about cryptocurrency, bitcoin and altcoins. Also they learn about it in the forum such as  Bitcointalk.org which is originally created to help people who is interested to learn about the topic. As they give information they also give rewards and contribution to everyone by posting Bounty Campaigns that's why many we have many participants in our bounty campaigns with a help of social media.

[k-west]

More people get knoweledge about crypto-good for everyone.I am happy watching schoolchildren in my town talking about cryptocoins and exchanges and grannies investing all their life-savings in crypto.This is so sweet.

[samward]

Companies r interested when there are a lot of participants. They r not very interested in how much we earn. They need to do a lot of advertising for some budget. The more advertising (participants), the more information about the project

[nadbucs]

Due to popularity of bounty campaigns there are lots of people joined the forum and started participating. I think it will not greatly affect the rewards since there are lots of ICO's also started. But in terms of the future of cryptocurrency this will be a good start because more and more people are adopting it. Anyhow, if you are one of the early birds here you don't need to worry so much because in signature campaign the stakes is always more.

[quang99]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

To solve this issue and appreciate the work of bounty hunters, I would also suggest that number of participants should be spelled out for each bounty campaign. This will limit the number of participants thus increase the reward for participants. The only disadvantage with this if applied would be that; it will be based on first come first serve but I think that will cool.

I think that companies are not interested in how much we get. They are interested in knowing about them the largest number of people, so I think that it is not always profitable for them to make a fixed number of participants.

[turagsoy123456]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

Hello guys,  yes we are to many her joining bounty campaign. But it dosen't matter as long as we are working hard and seriously to support our bounty campaign that we are promoted. Since their is a saying the more marrier as long as we have to deliver the best information with regard the important of the project so that it can attract the customer to invest their money about the bounty campaign project that we promoted.

[EvgenOrel]

Companies r interested when there are a lot of participants. They r not very interested in how much we earn. They need to do a lot of advertising for some budget. The more advertising (participants), the more information about the project

I completely agree. The main task of any company's bounty is a PR project, but how much its members earn will not bother anyone. Do not like a large number of employees, look for another company. The choice is not imposed on us by and large. And as a rule, companies about which little they talk about bring more money.

[Gifolote]

I also hope Bounty companies will impose restrictions on the number of participants.

[sjdk]

There are actually a lot of people taking part in the bounty, especially in our country, which is a way of earning your income only if you have time and energy. But the higher-level investors in the campaign (I believe) want to ensure the project's popularity and success. In any case, because our bounty hunters and investors, this cryptographic world will survive and will continue to grow.

[gudjhonson]

Hello community!
 What do you think about the popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and fewer rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again fewer rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns are more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

Yes, you are very right, now it is a lot of new people who join here and a lot of the following bounty. The more bounty participants the less the results we get. Unless the project we choose restricts the number of participants. Because here anyone can participate in the bounty program and no one can ban it as long as they do not break the rules.